Re: [SM-USERS] Reply-to-all no longer working in 1.4.23 and 1.5.2 on php 7

2019-08-11 Thread Paul Lesniewski
t;https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users>, > > <mailto:squirrelmail-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> > Reply-To: Squirrelmail User Support Mailing List > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply-to-all no longer working in 1.4.23 and 1.5.2 on php 7

2019-08-10 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 2019/08/10 6:43, jul-dez.2...@dipl-ing-kessler.de wrote: > Hi, > > I tested this on different systems (Ubuntu and Raspbian) each with PHP 7: > > Replying to an incoming email which was sent to more than one recipient > only puts sender's "from" info into "to" field, but no other recipients.

[SM-USERS] Reply-to-all no longer working in 1.4.23 and 1.5.2 on php 7

2019-08-10 Thread jul-dez.2...@dipl-ing-kessler.de
Hi, I tested this on different systems (Ubuntu and Raspbian) each with PHP 7: Replying to an incoming email which was sent to more than one recipient only puts sender's "from" info into "to" field, but no other recipients. This happens regardless if clicking on "reply" or "reply all". So, you ha

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply-To field

2013-11-15 Thread LuKreme
On 16 Oct 2013, at 18:24 , Paul Lesniewski wrote: > http://squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=248 Thanks for this (sorry for the late reply, I fixed the issue with judicious application of the clue-bat and forgot to check back). I have installed it, but my point was that Squirrelmail itself

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply-To field

2013-10-16 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:36 AM, LuKreme wrote: > A user complained that she was not getting any mail replies. Mail that was > not a reply was fine. After investigating, I saw that she had put her full > name into the reply to field. > > Evidently, there's no checking on this input to ensure tha

[SM-USERS] Reply-To field

2013-10-16 Thread LuKreme
A user complained that she was not getting any mail replies. Mail that was not a reply was fine. After investigating, I saw that she had put her full name into the reply to field. Evidently, there's no checking on this input to ensure that it contains an email address, or at least an @ sign. I

Re: [SM-USERS] reply to per folder setting

2013-02-07 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:09 AM, julius wrote: > hi, > > first of all, this is probably the wrong mailing list but since theres no > user mailing list where else should i post? > > im looking for a webmail solution that allows the following: > > if you have a folder hirarchy like this: > > yahoo

[SM-USERS] reply to per folder setting

2013-01-26 Thread julius
hi, first of all, this is probably the wrong mailing list but since theres no user mailing list where else should i post? im looking for a webmail solution that allows the following: if you have a folder hirarchy like this: yahoo acccount  - inbox  - sent google account  - inbox  - sent w

Re: [SM-USERS] reply to

2011-11-09 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:04 PM, michael crane wrote: > sorry for previous empty post the phone decided to send rather than leave. > I want to ask about the reply to header. I have had some problems with > this only in that if I click reply to some other list post I sometimes > reply to the list bu

[SM-USERS] reply to

2011-11-08 Thread michael crane
sorry for previous empty post the phone decided to send rather than leave. I want to ask about the reply to header. I have had some problems with this only in that if I click reply to some other list post I sometimes reply to the list but also sometimes just to the individual. what is the header in

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply-to should do some format checking...

2005-09-01 Thread Ricardo Stella
Looking to migrate to the latest version, I was revisiting all installed plugins and looking for anything obvious. I TOTALLY missed it ! Thank you ! Paul Lesneiwski wrote: >Simon wrote: > > >>Ours have a habit of entering their personal email address and then >>complain that the system must

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply-to should do some format checking...

2005-08-31 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
lmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [SM-USERS] Reply-to should do some format checking... > > > > Currently still at 1.4.3a > > We had a couple of users that didn't know what 'reply-to' means an email > address and instead entered their Name (ie Fir

RE: [SM-USERS] Reply-to should do some format checking...

2005-08-31 Thread Simon
problems! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Stella Sent: Thu, 1. September 2005 7:08 AM To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [SM-USERS] Reply-to should do some format checking... Currently still at 1.4.3a We had a

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply-to should do some format checking...

2005-08-31 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ricardo Stella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Currently still at 1.4.3a > > We had a couple of users that didn't know what 'reply-to' means an email > address and instead entered their Name (ie First Last). Welcome to the club > Is there anything to do some checking and/or to make sure that either

[SM-USERS] Reply-to should do some format checking...

2005-08-31 Thread Ricardo Stella
Currently still at 1.4.3a We had a couple of users that didn't know what 'reply-to' means an email address and instead entered their Name (ie First Last). Emails going out then have an improper reply-to field and appended the webmail host to it. Is there anything to do some checking and/or to m

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply to

2003-11-06 Thread pdontthink
> Hi Guys > > When replying to a message in SquirrelMail, does anyone know how to get a > 'On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:45:36PM -, Gareth wrote:' type tag? Check the archives. You can get limited reply citations in Options->Personal Preferences but if you want the date included, you'll need to

[SM-USERS] Reply to

2003-11-05 Thread Gareth
Hi Guys When replying to a message in SquirrelMail, does anyone know how to get a 'On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:45:36PM -, Gareth wrote:' type tag? Gareth --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net

[SM-USERS] reply to email errors

2003-07-21 Thread Keith Mastin
SM-1.4.1 Hitting 'reply' brings the compose window, with these at the bottom of the page: Warning: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /web/mlib/html/mlib/webmail/functions/page_header.php:29) in /web/mlib/html/mlib/webmail/functions/global.php on line 129 Wa

Re: [SM-USERS] reply to list option gone

2003-04-04 Thread William Hooper
AragonX said: > I'm not sure if this was a feature of SM or a plug-in. I used to have a > reply-to-list option when reading emails from a email list. I upgraded > to SM 1.4.0 today. Can someone tell me what I need to do to get that > back? > In 1.2.10 it was part of the "listcommands" plugin t

Re: [SM-USERS] reply to list option gone

2003-04-04 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Aragonx, On Friday, April 04, 2003, AragonX wrote... > I'm not sure if this was a feature of SM or a plug-in. I used to > have a reply-to-list option when reading emails from a email list. I > upgraded to SM 1.4.0 today. Can someone tell me what I need to do to > get that back? Enable the

Re: [SM-USERS] reply to list option gone

2003-04-04 Thread Chris Hilts
> I'm not sure if this was a feature of SM or a plug-in. I used to have a > reply-to-list option when reading emails from a email list. I upgraded to > SM 1.4.0 today. Can someone tell me what I need to do to get that back? It's a plugin, distributed with Squirrelmail. Go into conf.pl and enab

[SM-USERS] reply to list option gone

2003-04-04 Thread AragonX
I'm not sure if this was a feature of SM or a plug-in. I used to have a reply-to-list option when reading emails from a email list. I upgraded to SM 1.4.0 today. Can someone tell me what I need to do to get that back? --- This SF.net email is

[SM-USERS] Reply-To Option in Compose

2003-01-19 Thread SM-Development
Hi, I using SM-1.2.7-stable. I was wondering if we could move the Reply-To option from the Options (Main?) and put into the Compose Window. This for the convenience of certain persons (sysadmin) when certain outgoing email need to be replied to different address (not all the time). BTW, I'v