Re: [SM-USERS] missing emails

2010-03-06 Thread Paul Lesniewski
> Thank you for your response and your guidance.  I have re-read the mailing > list guidelines again.  I think I am clear.  When you said " In particular, > note that top-posting is not how you should respond to messages here."  Were > you referring to my response to Bill Mussatto (original thread

Re: [SM-USERS] missing emails

2010-03-06 Thread John Glynn
nal thread by Benedict Simon, Subject: "query regarding SMS")? Thank you again. John Glynn -Original Message- From: Paul Lesniewski [mailto:p...@squirrelmail.org] Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 2:01 PM To: Squirrelmail User Support Mailing List Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] missing

Re: [SM-USERS] missing emails

2010-03-06 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:01 AM, John Glynn wrote: > I apologize.  I have not posted here in years because my Squirrelmail has > been working flawlessly.  I forgot to put “[SM-USERS]” in the subject (I > think that is standard procedure). No, that prefix is added automatically for you. Please re-

[SM-USERS] missing emails

2010-03-06 Thread John Glynn
This problem seems to be happening prior to squirrel mail but I cannot be certain. My clients are each reporting missing emails. These are emails they are expecting to receive from senders they have received from in the past. They are now unable to receive any emails from these particular senders.

[SM-USERS] missing emails

2010-03-06 Thread John Glynn
I apologize. I have not posted here in years because my Squirrelmail has been working flawlessly. I forgot to put "[SM-USERS]" in the subject (I think that is standard procedure). Here is my problem again: This problem seems to be happening prior to squirrel mail but I cannot be certain. My