Re: [SM-USERS] migration from squirrelmail+uw-imap to squirrelmail+courierimap

2005-09-10 Thread Tony Earnshaw
lør, 10.09.2005 kl. 17.11 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> Do I just process each mbox file from the old server using mb2md and > >> make sure the directories are named correctly or is there some > >> squirrelmail magic that might help me? > > > > No SquirrelMail magic involved here... just use mb2md

Re: [SM-USERS] migration from squirrelmail+uw-imap to squirrelmail+courierimap

2005-09-10 Thread jam
>> Do I just process each mbox file from the old server using mb2md and >> make sure the directories are named correctly or is there some >> squirrelmail magic that might help me? > > No SquirrelMail magic involved here... just use mb2md on all the > files. You could cheat, and use imapsync or imap

Re: [SM-USERS] migration from squirrelmail+uw-imap to squirrelmail+courierimap

2005-09-09 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Shane Hickey, On Thursday, September 08, 2005, you wrote: [..] > My migration is going smoothly (mbox to maildir for the user's > spool is fine). However my question is about the mbox files that > squirrelmail stores (or, rather uw-imap, most

[SM-USERS] migration from squirrelmail+uw-imap to squirrelmail+courierimap

2005-09-08 Thread Shane Hickey
Howdy all, I apologize if this is a foolish question, I attempted to google up an answer, but I wasn't able to find exactly what I was looking for. Here's the scenario (on all servers, the version of squirrelmail/postfix/sendmail/uw-imap/courier/etc is the latest version in portage, as