Re: [SM-USERS] https

2012-08-02 Thread michael crane
On Tue, July 31, 2012 12:15 am, michael crane wrote: > I just use this stuff on my tiny home network and I don't know why I > enabled the https stuff on my server but now with the squirrelmail.stable > installation after a few minutes of composing I get > "The current page request appears to have

[SM-USERS] https

2012-07-30 Thread michael crane
I just use this stuff on my tiny home network and I don't know why I enabled the https stuff on my server but now with the squirrelmail.stable installation after a few minutes of composing I get "The current page request appears to have originated from an untrusted source." which didn't happen wit

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS problem

2009-05-26 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Machtelt Garrels wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:12:44PM -0700, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> Then this is entirely unrelated to SquirrelMail.  You should create a >> test document on your server with just "Hello >> World" and work out your Apache configuration un

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS problem

2009-05-26 Thread Machtelt Garrels
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:12:44PM -0700, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Then this is entirely unrelated to SquirrelMail. You should create a > test document on your server with just "Hello > World" and work out your Apache configuration until you > can access it with https. After that, SquirrelMail sh

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS problem

2009-05-26 Thread Paul Lesniewski
> Since the dawn of times I've been using Squirrelmail.  Until I was > forced to upgrade to Apache2, all went well.  Since, I've googled myself > dizzy to get HTTPS working again, but no result. > > I'll first give some more information about my system: > > OS: Debian 5.0.1 > Squirrelmail: squirrel

[SM-USERS] HTTPS problem

2009-05-26 Thread Machtelt Garrels
Dear co-squirrelmail users, Since the dawn of times I've been using Squirrelmail. Until I was forced to upgrade to Apache2, all went well. Since, I've googled myself dizzy to get HTTPS working again, but no result. I'll first give some more information about my system: OS: Debian 5.0.1 Squirre

Re: [SM-USERS] https redirect issue and IIS

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 1/11/08, Zeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi there, i have a problem with squirrelmail redirecting to http after > login instead of https. > the scenario is: > > squirrelmail on linux machine on port 443 and IIS on port 80 both > listening on same ip address. Uh, that's "interesting"... > s

[SM-USERS] https redirect issue and IIS

2008-01-11 Thread Zeta
hi there, i have a problem with squirrelmail redirecting to http after login instead of https. the scenario is: squirrelmail on linux machine on port 443 and IIS on port 80 both listening on same ip address. so i configured IIS to redirect any call to squirrelmail on port 80 to port 443. so far s

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS for login

2006-10-25 Thread IT-Support @ AStA TU Darmstadt
Don Russell schrieb: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] TU Darmstadt wrote: >> Hello squirrelmail-community, >> >> I've installed & configured squirrelmail on debian linux (etch/testing) >> with apache2 and so far it works fine! :-) >> What I want to do now, is to secure the login process. >> The manual tells abo

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS for login

2006-10-09 Thread Don Russell
Don Russell wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] TU Darmstadt wrote: > >> Hello squirrelmail-community, >> >> I've installed & configured squirrelmail on debian linux (etch/testing) >> with apache2 and so far it works fine! :-) >> What I want to do now, is to secure the login process. >> The manual tells

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS for login

2006-10-02 Thread Don Russell
Don Russell wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] TU Darmstadt wrote: > >> Hello squirrelmail-community, >> >> I've installed & configured squirrelmail on debian linux (etch/testing) >> with apache2 and so far it works fine! :-) >> What I want to do now, is to secure the login process. >> The manual tells

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS for login

2006-10-02 Thread Don Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] TU Darmstadt wrote: > Hello squirrelmail-community, > > I've installed & configured squirrelmail on debian linux (etch/testing) > with apache2 and so far it works fine! :-) > What I want to do now, is to secure the login process. > The manual tells about the "RedirectPermanent" op

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS for login

2006-10-02 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 02:16:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] TU Darmstadt > wrote: > >> The problem is, that configuring apache with "RedirectPermant" for >> squirrelmail-login obviously cause a loop and the browser hangs. Why? > > Without having the relevant parts of your webserver's config, it i

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS for login

2006-10-02 Thread Chris Hilts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] TU Darmstadt wrote: > What I want to do now, is to secure the login process. > I'd like to avoid using mod_rewrite. Have you considered the 'secure login' plugin? It works REALLY well for me. Chris Hilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BE

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS for login

2006-10-02 Thread Rainer Sokoll
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 02:16:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] TU Darmstadt wrote: > The problem is, that configuring apache with "RedirectPermant" for > squirrelmail-login obviously cause a loop and the browser hangs. Why? Without having the relevant parts of your webserver's config, it is hard to

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS for login

2006-10-02 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Hello squirrelmail-community, > > I've installed & configured squirrelmail on debian linux (etch/testing) > with apache2 and so far it works fine! :-) > What I want to do now, is to secure the login process. > The manual tells about the "RedirectPermanent" option that I already use > for mailman

[SM-USERS] HTTPS for login

2006-10-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] TU Darmstadt
Hello squirrelmail-community, I've installed & configured squirrelmail on debian linux (etch/testing) with apache2 and so far it works fine! :-) What I want to do now, is to secure the login process. The manual tells about the "RedirectPermanent" option that I already use for mailman and I would p

[SM-USERS] https problem

2005-10-12 Thread Anne Ramey
I have squirrelmail running on https, which, for the most part, works great. Sometimes, though, people will get a trying to view insecure data and secure on teh same page. After that, they get a "page not found" error. I'm thinking it's attachments, but it's not every one. Has anyone else se

Re: [SM-USERS] https webserver and https webmail server one public ip

2005-08-29 Thread Ben Holt
Dan Carl said the following on 08/29/05 10:20: > Here's my situation. > Internally I have two Linux servers, a commerce webserver and a mailserver > running webmail. > Externally I have only one public IP address. > I want to use ssl on both servers. > I fully understand the limitations of the HTT

[SM-USERS] https webserver and https webmail server one public ip

2005-08-29 Thread Dan Carl
Here's my situation. Internally I have two Linux servers, a commerce webserver and a mailserver running webmail. Externally I have only one public IP address. I want to use ssl on both servers. I fully understand the limitations of the HTTPS protocol.(1 cert 1 ip) I was told it's possible to have

RE: [SM-USERS] HTTPS auto-discovery causing page not founf errors

2005-08-09 Thread adam beecher
Marc, > I presume you're using apache 2.x (I'm still at 1.3.33). What > version of php are you running? I guess it's time to see what > came out in the most recent Redhat update and see what's changed. > Apache 2.0.46, PHP 4.3.2. Both installed via up2date on the 27th of July. However I'm prett

RE: [SM-USERS] HTTPS auto-discovery causing page not founf errors

2005-08-09 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: adam beecher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 2:21 PM > To: Marc Powell; squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [SM-USERS] HTTPS auto-discovery causing page not founf errors > > Hi Mark, > &

RE: [SM-USERS] HTTPS auto-discovery causing page not founf errors

2005-08-09 Thread adam beecher
Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Marc Powell > Sent: 09 August 2005 19:41 > To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [SM-USERS] HTTPS auto-discovery causing page not > founf errors > &

RE: [SM-USERS] HTTPS auto-discovery causing page not founf errors

2005-08-09 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of adam beecher > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 11:37 AM > To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [SM-USERS] HTTPS auto-discovery causing pag

[SM-USERS] HTTPS auto-discovery causing page not founf errors

2005-08-09 Thread adam beecher
(Latest stable SM on a bog-standard fully-up-to-date RHEL ES3 box.) For some reason when I perform certain tasks such as deleting the only message left in a folder or purging the trash, Squirrelmail is trying to deliver a HTTPS url at port 80. When I purge, for example, I get an Action Cancelled e

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS over port 80 / Cannot re-assign $this

2005-03-07 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Cameron, On Monday, March 07, 2005, Cameron Knowlton wrote... > I meant... why does 1.50 show up dominantly as the development > version, no 1.5.1? I wonder how many others get caught by that. 1.5.0 was the last released development version. 1.5.1 has not been released, which is why it is

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS over port 80 / Cannot re-assign $this

2005-03-07 Thread Cameron Knowlton
> > ?? it says 1.50 is current on the download page... >> >> http://www.squirrelmail.org/download.php >> >> what am I missing? > >It says that it is "Development Version". It is not stable and currently >released development version is older than 1.4.4. > >-- >Tomas > I meant... why does 1.50 show

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS over port 80 / Cannot re-assign $this

2005-03-07 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> ?? it says 1.50 is current on the download page... > > http://www.squirrelmail.org/download.php > > what am I missing? It says that it is "Development Version". It is not stable and currently released development version is older than 1.4.4. -- Tomas

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS over port 80 / Cannot re-assign $this

2005-03-06 Thread Cameron Knowlton
I'm running: OS X version 10.3.6 PHP version 5.0.2 SquirrelMail version 1.5.0 >>> >>> >>>1.5.0 is badly out of date by now, and I think it is missing some key PHP 5 >>>compatibility fixes. If you want to use the development version of SM, you >>>should always use a CVS snaps

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS over port 80 / Cannot re-assign $this

2005-03-06 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
I'm running: OS X version 10.3.6 PHP version 5.0.2 SquirrelMail version 1.5.0 1.5.0 is badly out of date by now, and I think it is missing some key PHP 5 compatibility fixes. If you want to use the development version of SM, you should always use a CVS snapshot (download on the web site in tar

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS over port 80 / Cannot re-assign $this

2005-03-06 Thread Cameron Knowlton
Title: Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS over port 80 / Cannot re-assign $this Cameron Knowlton wrote: I just had an epiphany that solved at least the HTTPS access over port 80 problem on Mac OS X, although it did then drop another problem on me  8^) To solve the inadvertent IMAP secure access: 1) in Server

Re: [SM-USERS] HTTPS over port 80 / Cannot re-assign $this

2005-03-06 Thread p dont think
Cameron Knowlton wrote: I just had an epiphany that solved at least the HTTPS access over port 80 problem on Mac OS X, although it did then drop another problem on me 8^) To solve the inadvertent IMAP secure access: 1) in Server Admin, change Mail/Settings/Advanced Settings/IMAP and POP SSL:

[SM-USERS] HTTPS over port 80 / Cannot re-assign $this

2005-03-06 Thread Cameron Knowlton
I just had an epiphany that solved at least the HTTPS access over port 80 problem on Mac OS X, although it did then drop another problem on me 8^) To solve the inadvertent IMAP secure access: 1) in Server Admin, change Mail/Settings/Advanced Settings/IMAP and POP SSL: to 'Don't Use' (as oppo

[SM-USERS] https and Disk quota

2004-12-10 Thread Justin Alonzo
I am using SM 1.43a PHP 4.3.8 Fedore Core 1 With all the updates Disk Quota 3.1.1 Everything was working fine when is was using http, I just switched to https I get a message with IE everytime I refresh the LeftBar that says The Page contains both secure and non secure items. Do you want to displ

Re: [SM-USERS] https during login session ?

2004-07-05 Thread Anders la Cour Bentzon
On 2004-07-05 17:50, Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hi > > Is it possible with squirrelmail to use HTTPS only during the > authentication session then use HTTP for normal email operations ? > > Thanks > Hello, There's a plugin that does exactly that at the SquirrelMail website (Secure Login). Check it out.

[SM-USERS] https during login session ?

2004-07-05 Thread Frank Bonnet
Hi Is it possible with squirrelmail to use HTTPS only during the authentication session then use HTTP for normal email operations ? Thanks -- Frank --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings

RE: [SM-USERS] https Login Timeout

2003-01-24 Thread Richard Cooper
> SquirrelMail 1.2.9 does not support IMAPS directly - you need to use a > wrapper like stunnel. If you are determined to make > SquirrelMail connect > directly to port 993, you'll need to upgrade to 1.4.0-rc2a > and PHP 4.3.x > (which has other issues, and I don't recommend doing) This is good

Re: [SM-USERS] https Login Timeout

2003-01-24 Thread Chris Hilts
>> I'm running (well almost) Squirrelmail 1.2.9 with Apache 1.2.7, php4.2, >> OpenSSL 0.9.6g and imap-uw-2002 on FreeBSD 4.7-Stable. I installed >> everything seems to be working fine - I changed squirrelmail to point to >> port 993 for imaps and I can connect to port 993 via telnet. I can Squirr

RE: [SM-USERS] https Login Timeout

2003-01-24 Thread Richard Cooper
> Are you connecting to an Imap server running on the same box? > If so, I think it only works if you use the regular Imap port. > You don't really need 993 for the https login anyway. > > Dennis. Thanks for the quick reply :) That would make sense, from the point of view of what's happening. I

Re: [SM-USERS] https Login Timeout

2003-01-24 Thread Dennis Durling
Richard Cooper said: > Hi, > I'm running (well almost) Squirrelmail 1.2.9 with Apache 1.2.7, php4.2, > OpenSSL 0.9.6g and imap-uw-2002 on FreeBSD 4.7-Stable. I installed > everything from the ports tree (Apache, PHP and OpenSSL were already > isntalled and I was already running a secure website). I

[SM-USERS] https Login Timeout

2003-01-24 Thread Richard Cooper
Hi, I'm running (well almost) Squirrelmail 1.2.9 with Apache 1.2.7, php4.2, OpenSSL 0.9.6g and imap-uw-2002 on FreeBSD 4.7-Stable. I installed everything from the ports tree (Apache, PHP and OpenSSL were already isntalled and I was already running a secure website). Individually everything seems