Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-31 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 1/31/07, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nate wrote: > > > I'll try to find some other web debugging plugins for firefox > > to see if that gives more insight. > > > Some good progress, from my last half dozen tests it appears I > cannot reproduce the problem if I go directly to SM 1.4.9a > >

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-31 Thread nate
nate wrote: > I'll try to find some other web debugging plugins for firefox > to see if that gives more insight. Some good progress, from my last half dozen tests it appears I cannot reproduce the problem if I go directly to SM 1.4.9a In the past when I upgraded SM I put it off a sub directory

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-31 Thread nate
nate wrote: > just when I thought I made some progress... > I went to my ubuntu laptop with firefox 1.5.0.8 and the frame > still vanishes even after physically restarting. Also with > Mozilla 1.7.12 under Ubuntu(which for me unlike firefox I have > no plugins installed in mozilla that may interfe

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-24 Thread nate
nate wrote: > I've left plugins off all night and so far I have not been able to > reproduce the problem in firefox 1.5. But in IE 6.0 I still get it > every time. I'll leave plugins off for another day or so and see if > I can get it to happen again. In IE6 I don't get any errors like > this anym

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-24 Thread nate
Fredrik Jervfors wrote: >> my SM is possessed! > > ...Or maybe your web server. This might be one of those cases when a > re-install of the web server and PHP might do the trick. This is just a > far fetched suggestion though. I've no real reason to suspect the server > to be the culprit, but then

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-24 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 1/24/07, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Lesniewski said: > > >> Error: window.parent.frames.left has no properties > >> Source File: > >> https://webmail.linuxpowered.net/sm149a/src/right_main.php?PG_SHOWALL=0&sort=0&startMessage=1&mailbox=user.hostmaster > >> Line: 62 > > > > You need t

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-24 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> my SM is possessed! ...Or maybe your web server. This might be one of those cases when a re-install of the web server and PHP might do the trick. This is just a far fetched suggestion though. I've no real reason to suspect the server to be the culprit, but then again: if SquirrelMail isn't broke

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-24 Thread nate
Paul Lesniewski said: >> Error: window.parent.frames.left has no properties >> Source File: >> https://webmail.linuxpowered.net/sm149a/src/right_main.php?PG_SHOWALL=0&sort=0&startMessage=1&mailbox=user.hostmaster >> Line: 62 > > You need to show what is on line 62, and WHAT click on your part > ca

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
Tomas Kuliavas said: > could you disable folder_synch plugin? just tried disabling all plugins again, restarted apache2 just incase, and no difference [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/public_html/sm149a/config$ grep -i plugin config.php [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/public_html/sm149a/config$ > Never trust values wri

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 1/23/07, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nate said: > > Paul Lesniewski said: > > > >> Since clicking on one of these links loads the page in the parent > >> frame, but the links clearly have target="right", unless the frameset > >> code (feel free to show that too) is somehow borked (bad HTML

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>> You get zero sized response. I think some PHP versions do that on >> memory_limit error. > > You are right! I was looking again at IE6 and when the problem > happened I checked that little icon and got the details -- > > -- > window.frames.parent.left.document is null or not an object > -- cou

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
nate said: > Paul Lesniewski said: > >> Since clicking on one of these links loads the page in the parent >> frame, but the links clearly have target="right", unless the frameset >> code (feel free to show that too) is somehow borked (bad HTML or that >> frame is not called "right"), then I cannot

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
Paul Lesniewski said: > Since clicking on one of these links loads the page in the parent > frame, but the links clearly have target="right", unless the frameset > code (feel free to show that too) is somehow borked (bad HTML or that > frame is not called "right"), then I cannot think that this ha

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 1/23/07, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Lesniewski said: > > > Is this pure 1.4.9? You should show the code (HTML source) for the > > left frame (before clicking). The target of all folder links should > > be the "right" frame. Also, show what you have set for the "top > > frame" in t

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
Paul Lesniewski said: > Is this pure 1.4.9? You should show the code (HTML source) for the > left frame (before clicking). The target of all folder links should > be the "right" frame. Also, show what you have set for the "top > frame" in the main config and whether or not you've fiddled with t

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 1/23/07, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonathan Angliss said: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi nate, > > Hey! whats happenin > > > I've grepped the stable source code, and cannot find any reference to > > the above javascript code. I've even gone down to just

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
Jonathan Angliss said: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi nate, Hey! whats happenin > I've grepped the stable source code, and cannot find any reference to > the above javascript code. I've even gone down to just "frames", and > while it does return a handful of results, non

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi nate, On Tuesday, January 23, 2007, nate wrote: > Tomas Kuliavas said: >> You get zero sized response. I think some PHP versions do that on >> memory_limit error. > You are right! I was looking again at IE6 and when the problem > happened I checke

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
nate said: > Tomas Kuliavas said: > >> You get zero sized response. I think some PHP versions do that on >> memory_limit error. > > You are right! I was looking again at IE6 and when the problem > happened I checked that little icon and got the details -- > > -- > window.frames.parent.left.documen

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
Tomas Kuliavas said: > You get zero sized response. I think some PHP versions do that on > memory_limit error. You are right! I was looking again at IE6 and when the problem happened I checked that little icon and got the details -- -- window.frames.parent.left.document is null or not an object

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-22 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>> Some questions. > > thanks for the response! > >> >> 1. Blank page means PHP error or memory_limit issue. Do you have PHP >> display_errors set to on and error_reporting set to E_ALL? Could you >> make >> sure that PHP memory_limit is set higher than default value? If you use >> default Postfix

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-22 Thread nate
Tomas Kuliavas said: > Some questions. thanks for the response! > > 1. Blank page means PHP error or memory_limit issue. Do you have PHP > display_errors set to on and error_reporting set to E_ALL? Could you make > sure that PHP memory_limit is set higher than default value? If you use > default

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-20 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> It's been almost a year since I first posted on this but was > wondering if anyone else had seen this behavior since. > > I've been an SM user since ~1.0 was released in Jan of '01 > (or was it '02?). All versions up to 1.4.1 have worked quite > well for me, really none have since, they all seem

[SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-20 Thread nate
It's been almost a year since I first posted on this but was wondering if anyone else had seen this behavior since. I've been an SM user since ~1.0 was released in Jan of '01 (or was it '02?). All versions up to 1.4.1 have worked quite well for me, really none have since, they all seem to trigger