> i am using qmailtoaster 64 bit
>
> vpopmail, centos 6 64 bit
> mysql database
>
> vpopmail has every domain as a seperate table example
That's weird. What's the use?
> if my domain name is : x.com then the table is
> x_com
>
> i edited the config.php of the change_sqlpass plugin as adv
hi
i am using qmailtoaster 64 bit
vpopmail, centos 6 64 bit
mysql database
vpopmail has every domain as a seperate table example
if my domain name is : x.com then the table is
x_com
i edited the config.php of the change_sqlpass plugin as advised here
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Dexter Tomisson wrote:
>
>
> On 17 May 2010 03:16, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>>
>> Before posting, try searching.
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/37455
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.plugins/15607
>>
>
> Oh yeah, same
On 17 May 2010 03:16, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> Before posting, try searching.
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/37455
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.plugins/15607
>
>
Oh yeah, same answer always.
"I have a better one, but I'm hiding it from you all" is
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Dexter Tomisson wrote:
> Hello.
> Does the current change_sqlpass plugin has that bug?
> http://rubyat.com/blog/2010/02/squirrelmail-change_sqlpass-plugin/
>
> By the way,
> someone on IRC posted a patch for "This page request could not be verified
> and appears to
Hello.
Does the current change_sqlpass plugin has that bug?
http://rubyat.com/blog/2010/02/squirrelmail-change_sqlpass-plugin/
By the way,
someone on IRC posted a patch for "This page request could not be verified
and appears to have expired." error:
http://pastebin.com/q93CsHHs
Dunno if that wo
I did not create anotehr thread, I modified my existing, as it was no
longer a question, I determined it a bug therefor modded the subject
indicating such, so perhaps a coder who ignored my "question" would read
the bug report :)
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Res wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Res wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi.
>> getting this error since upgrading using this plugin
>>
>> This page request could not be verified and appears to have expired.
>>
>
> By disabling the security check this works fine, however it is not op
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Res wrote:
>
> Hi.
> getting this error since upgrading using this plugin
>
> This page request could not be verified and appears to have expired.
>
By disabling the security check this works fine, however it is not optimal
to leave in this state now since the hard work was p
