Re: [SM-USERS] big mailbox problem

2004-10-08 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello P, On Wednesday, October 06, 2004, p dont think wrote... >> With the e-mail client like outlook express, everything is working >> almost perfect, I synchronize headers only, and It does not takes too long. >> >> But when I’m using squirrelmail, it is takingng a while though I have a >> 100

Re: [SM-USERS] big mailbox problem

2004-10-06 Thread p dont think
My situation is the following I have a big mailbox – 5000 mails, which is 170 MB. The system is RedHat AS, sendmail-8.12.10-1, procmail-3.22-9, squirrelmail-1.4.3-3, imap-2002d-2. With the e-mail client like outlook express, everything is working almost perfect, I synchronize headers only, and I

Re: [SM-USERS] big mailbox problem

2004-10-06 Thread Ken Brush
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 21:57:47 -0700 (PDT), R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > My situation is the following > > I have a big mailbox â 5000 mails, which is 170 MB. > > The system is RedHat AS, sendmail-8.12.10-1, procmail-3.22-9, > squirrelmail-1.4.3-3, imap-2002d-2. [snip] > Is th

[SM-USERS] big mailbox problem

2004-10-04 Thread R R
Hello, My situation is the following I have a big mailbox – 5000 mails, which is 170 MB. The system is RedHat AS, sendmail-8.12.10-1, procmail-3.22-9, squirrelmail-1.4.3-3, imap-2002d-2. With the e-mail client like outlook express, everything is working almost perfect, I synchronize headers only,