Re: [SM-USERS] Which httpd/apache version is compatible with Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2006-10-02 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Hi! Tomas and Tonino, > > Many thanks for your replies > > So it seems that we are narrowing choices: > > WHAT about the following combination on RHEL 4.4 ? > - PHP (from source)5.1.6 > - httpd (from source) 2.0.59 or 2.2.3 > - squirrelmail (custom fr

Re: [SM-USERS] Which httpd/apache version is compatible with Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2006-10-02 Thread Eddy Beliveau
Hi! Tomas and Tonino, Many thanks for your replies So it seems that we are narrowing choices: WHAT about the following combination on RHEL 4.4 ? - PHP (from source)5.1.6 - httpd (from source) 2.0.59 or 2.2.3 - squirrelmail (custom from source) 1.4.8

Re: [SM-USERS] Which httpd/apache version is compatible with Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2006-09-28 Thread Eddy Beliveau
Hi! Tomas and Tonino, Many thanks for your replies So it seems that we are narrowing choices: what about the following combination on RHEL 4.4 ? - PHP (from source)5.1.6 - httpd (from source) 2.0.59 or 2.2.3 - squirrelmail (custom from source) 1.4.8

Re: [SM-USERS] Which httpd/apache version is compatible with Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2006-09-28 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.32 27/09/2006, Eddy Beliveau wrote: Hi! Networkers,   We are using the following components with success on RH 9.0: - squirrelmail 1.4.2-1 - httpd-apache   2.0.40-21 - PHP4 4.2.2-17 - up-imapproxy  1.2.4-1   Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1 has been heavily personnalized so it cannot be

Re: [SM-USERS] Which httpd/apache version is compatible with Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2006-09-27 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> We are using the following components with success on RH 9.0: > squirrelmail 1.4.2-1, httpd-apache 2.0.40-21, PHP4 4.2.2-17, > up-imapproxy 1.2.4-1 > Which httpd version is compatible with SQ 1.4.2-1 ? ( 2.0.59 ? or > 2.2.3 > >> We've added lots of fixes between 1.4.2 and

Re: [SM-USERS] Which httpd/apache version is compatible with Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2006-09-27 Thread Eddy Beliveau
We are using the following components with success on RH 9.0: squirrelmail 1.4.2-1, httpd-apache 2.0.40-21, PHP4 4.2.2-17, up-imapproxy 1.2.4-1 Which httpd version is compatible with SQ 1.4.2-1 ? ( 2.0.59 ? or 2.2.3 > We've added lots of fixes between 1.4.2 and 1.4.8 versi

Re: [SM-USERS] Which httpd/apache version is compatible with Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2006-09-27 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>>> We are using the following components with success on RH 9.0: >>> squirrelmail 1.4.2-1, httpd-apache 2.0.40-21, PHP4 4.2.2-17, >>> up-imapproxy 1.2.4-1 >>> Which httpd version is compatible with SQ 1.4.2-1 ? ( 2.0.59 ? or 2.2.3 >>> ? >>> or another one) ? > >> SquirrelMail is coded in PHP

Re: [SM-USERS] Which httpd/apache version is compatible with Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2006-09-27 Thread Eddy Beliveau
>> We are using the following components with success on RH 9.0: >> squirrelmail 1.4.2-1, httpd-apache 2.0.40-21, PHP4 4.2.2-17, >> up-imapproxy 1.2.4-1 >> Which httpd version is compatible with SQ 1.4.2-1 ? ( 2.0.59 ? or 2.2.3 ? >> or another one) ? > SquirrelMail is coded in PHP language.

Re: [SM-USERS] Which httpd/apache version is compatible with Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2006-09-27 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Hi! Networkers, > > We are using the following components with success on RH 9.0: > - squirrelmail 1.4.2-1 > - httpd-apache 2.0.40-21 > - PHP4 4.2.2-17 > - up-imapproxy 1.2.4-1 > > Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1 has been heavily personnalized so it cannot be change > for the moment. > >

[SM-USERS] Which httpd/apache version is compatible with Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2006-09-27 Thread Eddy Beliveau
Hi! Networkers,   We are using the following components with success on RH 9.0: - squirrelmail 1.4.2-1 - httpd-apache   2.0.40-21 - PHP4 4.2.2-17 - up-imapproxy  1.2.4-1   Squirrelmail 1.4.2-1 has been heavily personnalized so it cannot be change for the moment.   I has been