Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages - problem solved

2007-05-07 Thread Rainer Sokoll
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:51:59AM -0700, Bob wrote: > While I don't have the problem any longer, I am troubled too by such a > dramatic change just by caching the session. Is there something lurking > in the background I inadvertently worked around? It is time for the administrator's weapons:

Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages - problem solved

2007-05-07 Thread Bob
Rainer Sokoll wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 04:24:06PM -0700, Bob wrote: > > >> Thanks for the great suggestions. I went down >> http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/SquirrelMailPerformance exploring the >> various solutions. I decided to try an imap proxy >> (http://www.imapproxy.org). This comp

Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages - problem solved

2007-05-07 Thread Rainer Sokoll
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 04:24:06PM -0700, Bob wrote: > Thanks for the great suggestions. I went down > http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/SquirrelMailPerformance exploring the > various solutions. I decided to try an imap proxy > (http://www.imapproxy.org). This completely solved the problem. The

Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages - problem solved

2007-05-04 Thread Bob
Bob wrote: > Paul Lesniewski wrote: > >> Please do NOT reply offlist >> >> On 5/4/07, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Paul Lesniewski wrote: >>> >>> On 5/4/07, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at

Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages

2007-05-04 Thread Bob
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Please do NOT reply offlist > > On 5/4/07, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> >>> On 5/4/07, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:34:46AM -0700, Bob wrote: > Un

Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages

2007-05-04 Thread Paul Lesniewski
Please do NOT reply offlist On 5/4/07, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > On 5/4/07, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:34:46AM -0700, Bob wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Unless I have this very wrong, DNS isn't needed to get to the login >

Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages

2007-05-04 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 5/4/07, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:34:46AM -0700, Bob wrote: > > > Unless I have this very wrong, DNS isn't needed to get to the login > > screen, and DNS is running very fast too. This server doesn't get a lot > > of traffic. Even putting in an invalid

Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages

2007-05-04 Thread Rainer Sokoll
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:34:46AM -0700, Bob wrote: > Unless I have this very wrong, DNS isn't needed to get to the login > screen, and DNS is running very fast too. This server doesn't get a lot > of traffic. Even putting in an invalid user name and password takes a > very long time to displa

Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages

2007-05-03 Thread Bob
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu 2007-05-03 12:23:17 -0400, Bob wrote: > > >> The squirrelmail functionality is fine, just very very very >> slow. Any thoughts? I'm stumped. >> > > This sounds like it could potentially be a DNS timeout.

Re: [SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages

2007-05-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu 2007-05-03 12:23:17 -0400, Bob wrote: > The squirrelmail functionality is fine, just very very very > slow. Any thoughts? I'm stumped. This sounds like it could potentially be a DNS timeout. Is squirrelmail trying to look up DNS information,

[SM-USERS] Very slow display of all Squirrelmail pages

2007-05-03 Thread Bob
I have been using squirrelmail for some time. I just migrated to a new, fast server. For reasons I can't understand, it takes over a minute to display all pages, even the first login screen takes about 20 seconds to display.. I tried with a brand new email account and the delay was the same as