On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 06:41:32PM -0500, Keith Mastin wrote:
> >Because with Maildir, except on reiserfs, you could go out of inodes.
>
> .. that would be some trick... even with stock ext2/3 fs, each inode
> represents 4KB or 256 inodes/MB. Of course you can always redraw your
> inode tables a
>Because with Maildir, except on reiserfs, you could go out of inodes.
.. that would be some trick... even with stock ext2/3 fs, each inode
represents 4KB or 256 inodes/MB. Of course you can always redraw your
inode tables and make them represent 1KB/inode, but for me, I think its a
moot point.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Luc Brouard wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:50:10 +
> From: Luc Brouard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] UW imap & qmail
>
> Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> > Hello Luc,
> > On Mon
Hello Luc,
On Monday, January 13, 2003, Luc Brouard wrote...
>>> What it is said in the FAQ is not that using Maildir is
>>> "sacrificing the performance & robustness and other things..." for
>>> every implementation ...
>> Could it be that they mean patching UW-IMAP to support Maildir is
>> sacr
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Hello Luc,
On Monday, January 13, 2003, Luc Brouard wrote...
What it is said in the FAQ is not that using Maildir is "sacrificing
the performance & robustness and other things..." for every
implementation ...
Could it be that they mean patching UW-IMAP to support Ma
Hello Abhay,
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, Abhay Kulkarni wrote...
> It is pretty clear from IMAP that better don't use qmail. Or use it
> with courier Imap sacrificing the performance & robustness and other
> things...( that is what they say)
What performance hits are you taking by changing to co
Hi Everybody.
Thanks for your response to my problem. It is the IMAP problem.
Here is what I got from the UW-IMAP FAQ :-
1. Is there support for qmail and the maildir format?
"There is no support for qmail or the maildir format in our distribution, nor
are there any plans to add such support. Ma
