Hello Brian,
On Friday, October 10, 2003, Brian S. Bergin wrote...
> Now perhaps a nntp group like comp.dcom.sys.cisco might be an idea
> or comp.protocols.dns.bind where they also keep an archive at
> isc.org. If find both of those useful and they're frequented by
> experts and novices alike.
E
Hello Caleb,
On Friday, October 10, 2003, Caleb Phillips wrote...
> All I really want is my squirrel-mail t-shirt. After reading
> thousands of 'noisy' emails, responding to my share, and patiently
> waiting through change in command - I think I have deserved the
> right to throw money at a good p
At 19:07 10 10 03 Friday, you wrote:
that
may be. however, breaking out the list with finer granularity.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem with lists broken is experienced users wouldn't subscribe to
any except perhaps upgrade-problems so none would benefit from o
that may be. however, breaking out the list with finer granularity.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If categories were divided in this manner, the only people who would
read the upgrade-problems list and the newusers list would be newusers
and people with upgrade problems
> First I search the archives (a mechanism that could
> stand some improvement
gmane.org
> then I post the question. More useful to me
> would be notifications of replies to my posts only. Everything else
is
> just background noise. Can Mailman be configured to do this? And if
not,
> has any
that may be. however, breaking out the list with finer granularity.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:31 AM 10/7/2003, Dean Holden wrote:
I think it has something to do with that sharing thing I learned about in
grade school. A participation thing, where you give some hel
I think it has something to do with that sharing thing I learned about in
grade school. A participation thing, where you give some help, and get
some help...
= Original message from Mark Brasche =
> I realize some of you may like to see everything that's said regarding a
> product you're w
I realize some of you may like to see everything that's said regarding a
product you're working with in a setting such as this but that's not what
I come here for. First I search the archives (a mechanism that could
stand some improvement), then I post the question. More useful to me
would be not
