Re: [SM-USERS] The latest version of Squirrelmail 1.5.2 will only connect to MySQL-databases if I not change the default table names

2019-08-12 Thread Anders Boholdt-Petersen
Hi again I now have created the table in the MySQL-database with new names for SquirrelMail. I found the SQL- enquiries on http://squirrelmail.org/docs/admin/admin-5.html. Look under the heading "Storing address books in the database". Regards, Anders Please support Open Source Software by don

Re: [SM-USERS] The latest version of Squirrelmail 1.5.2 will only connect to MySQL-databases if I not change the default table names

2019-08-11 Thread Lindsay Haisley
On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 15:27 +, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > 2. Is it possible that configtest.php can be modified, so you see an error > > if Squirrelmail not can find the tables in MySQL-databases? > > That's a morass that I don't think we'll wade into.  There's plenty of > different database e

Re: [SM-USERS] The latest version of Squirrelmail 1.5.2 will only connect to MySQL-databases if I not change the default table names

2019-08-11 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Sun, August 11, 2019 10:12 am, Anders Boholdt-Petersen wrote: > Hi Paul > > ---Paul Lesniewski wrote on August 11, 2019 00:25--- >> SquirrelMail does not create database tables for you. You are >> responsible for doing that and the configuration lets you adapt the >> table and column names as

Re: [SM-USERS] The latest version of Squirrelmail 1.5.2 will only connect to MySQL-databases if I not change the default table names

2019-08-11 Thread Anders Boholdt-Petersen
Hi Paul ---Paul Lesniewski wrote on August 11, 2019 00:25--- > SquirrelMail does not create database tables for you. You are responsible for > doing that and the configuration lets you adapt the table and column names as > necessary to your environment. 1. Is it a new option, that Squirrelmail

Re: [SM-USERS] The latest version of Squirrelmail 1.5.2 will only connect to MySQL-databases if I not change the default table names

2019-08-10 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 2019/08/10 14:50, Anders Boholdt-Petersen wrote: > Hi everyone > > > > Today I have installed the latest developer version of Squirrelmail 1.5.2 > [SVN) from the Squirrelmail website. > > > > In connection with some tests, I installed Squirrelmail on two different > subdomains on my w

[SM-USERS] The latest version of Squirrelmail 1.5.2 will only connect to MySQL-databases if I not change the default table names

2019-08-10 Thread Anders Boholdt-Petersen
Hi everyone Today I have installed the latest developer version of Squirrelmail 1.5.2 [SVN) from the Squirrelmail website. In connection with some tests, I installed Squirrelmail on two different subdomains on my webhost remotely via FTP. One where Squirrelmail store information about users

Re: [SM-USERS] the outgoing server stopped working

2011-04-12 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> 2 days ago the outgoing server stopped working and stopped allowing me > to receive emails on my ipad and iphone. i checked all the settings and > reset them per your instructions and it still won't work. can you look > into this? Sorry, but we can't help you. We're software developers, not ser

[SM-USERS] the outgoing server stopped working

2011-04-12 Thread Danielle Goldberg
2 days ago the outgoing server stopped working and stopped allowing me to receive emails on my ipad and iphone. i checked all the settings and reset them per your instructions and it still won't work. can you look into this? --

Re: [SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM, David C. Rankin > wrote: >> David C. Rankin wrote: >>> Paul, >> >>> As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. >>> The >>> upper one with all of the other buttons, and then the lower one, standing >>> alo

Re: [SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > David C. Rankin wrote: >> Paul, > >> >> As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. >> The >> upper one with all of the other buttons, and then the lower one, standing >> alone, under the edit window of th

Re: [SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. > The > upper one with all of the other buttons, and then the lower one, standing > alone, under the edit window of the e-mail message. The upper one works fine, > the lower one simple

Re: [SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > THE PROBLEM > > As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. > The > upper one with all of the other buttons, and then the lower one, standing > alone, under the edit window of the e-mail message. The upper one works fine, > the l

[SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul, I think I have found another little nit for you in trunk. This issue has existed for 1 or 2 revisions it is still present in rev. 13395. THE PROBLEM As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. The upper one with all of the other buttons, and then

[SM-USERS] The Squirrel In A Pod

2007-10-11 Thread Paul Lesniewski
Hi all, Sorry for the cross-post. Just wanted to let you know that Dimitri Larmuseau has reviewed SquirrelMail in his Sourcetrunk podcast. It aired on the October 8th, 2007 and can be found here: http://www.sourcetrunk.com Cheers, Paul ---

[SM-USERS] The +

2007-03-26 Thread Jonathan Jackson
Hi all, Can anyone tell me what the + symbol means - it appears next to some of my users Inbox e-mails. Thanks, Jonathan - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll

Re: [SM-USERS] The +

2007-03-26 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 3/26/07, Jonathan Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > Can anyone tell me what the + symbol means – it appears next to some of my > users Inbox e-mails. It means there is an attachment. - Take Surveys.

Re: [SM-USERS] The +

2007-03-26 Thread Wm Mussatto
On Mon, March 26, 2007 12:09, Jonathan Jackson said: > Hi all, > > Can anyone tell me what the + symbol means - it appears next to some of my > users Inbox e-mails. > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > Well if its in the Folder's frame it means that there are other folders hidden under the visible one. Click

Re: [SM-USERS] The page cannot be displayed error

2006-08-14 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> When I try to put messages in the trash, this is what I get: > > The page cannot be displayed > > I get a very similar deal with Horde, when I login, but there I don't > even get to my mailbox. > > Anything I need to do with SquirrelMail so I don't get this message > anymore and that my messages

[SM-USERS] The page cannot be displayed error

2006-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I try to put messages in the trash, this is what I get: The page cannot be displayed I get a very similar deal with Horde, when I login, but there I don't even get to my mailbox. Anything I need to do with SquirrelMail so I don't get this message anymore and that my messages are dumped pr

Re: [SM-USERS] 'The connection was reset' errors

2006-05-18 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> I have a user who is getting errors > 'The connection was reset'. > > Do you have any hints about what may be causing this? > Apparently they can log in the first time fine but if they try to do > something (in this case save a draft) the error shows. > > If they try to log in again straight away

[SM-USERS] 'The connection was reset' errors

2006-05-18 Thread Daniel Watts
I have a user who is getting errors 'The connection was reset'. Do you have any hints about what may be causing this? Apparently they can log in the first time fine but if they try to do something (in this case save a draft) the error shows. If they try to log in again straight away it shows t

[SM-USERS] The Autocomplete plugin and Firefox

2006-01-29 Thread Pål Monstad
FC3 PHP 4.3.11-2.8 SM 1.4.4.1 The html-mail plugin runs fine, but it's not possible to switch from = HTML to plain text mode or vice versa. Nothing happens. Have tested = latest version of Firefox and IE. Swithing fram HTML to plain text mode = gives me the warning and then nothing happens. Any i

Re: [SM-USERS] The Autocomplete plugin and Firefox

2006-01-28 Thread jam
> I have installed the Autocomplete plugin on my SM 1.4.4.1, FC3. The plugin > works fine with IE, but it does not work with Firefox 1.5. > > The plugin is very nice, and it's a pitty it won't work with Firefox. Is > there a possibility to get this limitation fixed? > -- Have a look at http://sour

[SM-USERS] The Autocomplete plugin and Firefox

2006-01-27 Thread Pål Monstad
I have installed the Autocomplete plugin on my SM 1.4.4.1, FC3. The plugin works fine with IE, but it does not work with Firefox 1.5. The plugin is very nice, and it's a pitty it won't work with Firefox. Is there a possibility to get this limitation fixed? -- Pål Monstad ---

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-20 Thread Alexandros Vellis
R. Welz wrote: > Unfortunately I don't speak any LDAP (yet). Time to start learning then. ;) :) Cheers, Alexandros --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-20 Thread John Madden
> Yes, Postgres supports SSL but cyrus and postfix insist to give the > cleartext password through sasl which builds the query string (the SELCT) > with the cleartext password. Do someone know if it is possible to wrap > sssl around that? Is stunnel the mean of choice here? Yes, read the postgres

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-20 Thread R. Welz
John Madden wrote: >> Is there a way to get mySQL/Postgres over sasl with hashed passwords or >> ssl? I >> hate >> clear-text passwords floating around the network. > > PostgreSQL supports SSL natively. Storing passwords in plain text is > still a bad > idea. Storing them in a database is probab

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-20 Thread R. Welz
R. Welz wrote: > > John Madden wrote: >>> Is there a way to get mySQL/Postgres over sasl with hashed passwords or >>> ssl? I >>> hate >>> clear-text passwords floating around the network. >> >> PostgreSQL supports SSL natively. Storing passwords in plain text is >> still a bad >> idea. Storing t

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-20 Thread John Madden
> Is there a way to get mySQL/Postgres over sasl with hashed passwords or ssl? I > hate > clear-text passwords floating around the network. PostgreSQL supports SSL natively. Storing passwords in plain text is still a bad idea. Storing them in a database is probably the not-great idea that needs

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-20 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> John Madden wrote: >>>Does Cyrus use MySQL/PGSQL for the auth? >> >> I believe it can. Cyrus is heavy on its use of SASL for authentication >> and I >> imagine there are plugins out there to do db-based auth. >> >> John >> > > Unfortunately mySQL (and Postgres) via sasl doesn't support encryptio

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-20 Thread Robert Welz
John Madden wrote: Does Cyrus use MySQL/PGSQL for the auth? I believe it can. Cyrus is heavy on its use of SASL for authentication and I imagine there are plugins out there to do db-based auth. John Unfortunately mySQL (and Postgres) via sasl doesn't support encryption. I have a cyrus bac

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-19 Thread Abdulla Hamad
Hey! --- John Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > cyrus-imapd-2.2.12_2 > > You'll want to use this version in general. You > may, however, find benefit in > compiling it yourself rather than using the > distribution's package. > > John > > > > > -- > John Madden > Sr. UNIX Systems Engine

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-19 Thread John Madden
> In my experience, you may find frustration in compiling Cyrus for > yourself. Not the easiest build in the world, if you ask me. Or maybe > I've just had bad luck... It was tough on amd64 until I figured out that they don't ship recent-enough autoconf config files, but those are easy enough to

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-19 Thread Chris Hilts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Madden wrote: >>cyrus-imapd-2.2.12_2 > > You'll want to use this version in general. You may, however, find benefit in > compiling it yourself rather than using the distribution's package. In my experience, you may find frustration in compiling

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-19 Thread John Madden
> cyrus-imapd-2.2.12_2 You'll want to use this version in general. You may, however, find benefit in compiling it yourself rather than using the distribution's package. John -- John Madden Sr. UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-19 Thread Sasa Stupar
--On 19. januar 2006 3:41 -0500 Abdulla Hamad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Ted and John, --- Ted Targosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I second John's advice... I've run UW IMAP and dovecot before coming to cyrus, and cyrus is far more scalable In the past its been difficult to set up,

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-19 Thread zamri
> Hello Ted and John, > > --- Ted Targosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I second John's advice... I've run UW IMAP and >> dovecot before coming to >> cyrus, and cyrus is far more scalable In the >> past its been difficult >> to set up, but now Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 (and a >> few other >>

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-19 Thread Abdulla Hamad
Hello Ted and John, --- Ted Targosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I second John's advice... I've run UW IMAP and > dovecot before coming to > cyrus, and cyrus is far more scalable In the > past its been difficult > to set up, but now Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 (and a > few other > distributions

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-15 Thread Ted Targosz
I second John's advice... I've run UW IMAP and dovecot before coming to cyrus, and cyrus is far more scalable In the past its been difficult to set up, but now Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 (and a few other distributions) comes with cyrus RPM packages that make the job much easier. I can't comment

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-15 Thread John Madden
> Does Cyrus use MySQL/PGSQL for the auth? I believe it can. Cyrus is heavy on its use of SASL for authentication and I imagine there are plugins out there to do db-based auth. John -- John Madden Sr. UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-15 Thread Abdulla Hamad
Hello John, --- John Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the disadvantages of both cyrus and > courier > > from your experience? > > > > What about Dovecot, is it an option too or not? > > I'd place Dovecot on about the same level as courier > (although it's perhaps a bit > less mature

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-15 Thread John Madden
> What is the disadvantages of both cyrus and courier > from your experience? > > What about Dovecot, is it an option too or not? I'd place Dovecot on about the same level as courier (although it's perhaps a bit less mature). (I have no personal experience with a Dovecot installation.) Courier i

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-15 Thread Abdulla Hamad
Hello Tomas, --- Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > > > From your rich knowledge what is the best IMAP4 > server > > fits SM 1.4.5? > > cyrus, courier or any other server that supports > server side sorting and > does not use unix mailbox format to store mail data.

Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-15 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Hello folks, > > > From your rich knowledge what is the best IMAP4 server > fits SM 1.4.5? cyrus, courier or any other server that supports server side sorting and does not use unix mailbox format to store mail data. -- Tomas --- This SF.n

[SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x

2006-01-15 Thread Abdulla Hamad
Hello folks, >From your rich knowledge what is the best IMAP4 server fits SM 1.4.5? I used DBMail 2.0.7 with SM and it turned out that MySQL can't handle the big files and always crash. Thank you, -A _

Re: [SM-USERS] The concept of custom charset plugin but for Japanese

2006-01-12 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Thanks, Tomas > > > I'll do some switching and try that out. > > > I must have not been clear, the users are only using Squirrelmail, there > isn't a Japanese email client that is incompatible, that I've noticed. > It's just that there are Japanese users sending in iso-2022-jp to English > users

Re: [SM-USERS] The concept of custom charset plugin but for Japanese

2006-01-12 Thread Rex Hale
Thanks, Tomas   I'll do some switching and try that out.   I must have not been clear, the users are only using Squirrelmail, there isn't a Japanese email client that is incompatible, that I've noticed.  It's just that there are Japanese users sending in iso-2022-jp to English users who can'

Re: [SM-USERS] The concept of custom charset plugin, but for other languages

2006-01-12 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Squirrelmail 1.4.5, Courier on Fedora Core 3, in case it matters. > My default charset is set to utf-8 > > > I have some users who are Japanese who have noticed that since compose > switches the charset (to iso-2022-jp), unless the recipient (also on > squirrelmail), is displaying in Japanese, th

[SM-USERS] The concept of custom charset plugin, but for other languages

2006-01-12 Thread Rex Hale
Squirrelmail 1.4.5, Courier on Fedora Core 3, in case it matters. My default charset is set to utf-8   I have some users who are Japanese who have noticed that since compose switches the charset (to iso-2022-jp), unless the recipient (also on squirrelmail), is displaying in Japanese, the char

Re: [SM-USERS] the most obvious question in the world...

2005-08-08 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
On Mon, August 8, 2005 11:14, Kae Verens wrote: > I've just installed version 1.5.0, on PHP 5. I needed to fix one line of > code in order to get the thing to work in PHP 5 (commented out line 187 of > Message.class.php - maybe that should be fixed?), but apart from > that, it wasn't too tricky to

[SM-USERS] the most obvious question in the world...

2005-08-08 Thread Kae Verens
I've just installed version 1.5.0, on PHP 5. I needed to fix one line of code in order to get the thing to work in PHP 5 (commented out line 187 of Message.class.php - maybe that should be fixed?), but apart from that, it wasn't too tricky to set up. I also needed to work around the fact that S

[SM-USERS] The specified message set is invalid?

2005-03-23 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
We use SquirrelMail from CVS HEAD and the vlogin plugin All over a suddden the users on the Exchange server get this message when they want to look at a mail: - snip - ERROR : Could not complete request. Query: FETCH 732 BODY[] Reason Given: The specified message set is invalid. -

Re: [SM-USERS] The IMAP server is reporting that plain text logins are disabled.

2005-01-31 Thread Ean Kingston
First, Lets keep this on-list. On January 31, 2005 06:32 pm, Javier Santos wrote: > thanks, > i have searched authentication method for my imap version but not too much > results > my imap version is imap-2002d-53 on SuSE 9.0. That looks like a UW version number to me. You might want to

Re: [SM-USERS] The IMAP server is reporting that plain text logins are disabled.

2005-01-31 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> I have installed squirrelmail on Linux SuSE 9.0 when i try to login the > next error apear > > ERROR: > Bad request: The IMAP server is reporting that plain text logins are > disabled. > Using CRAM-MD5 or DIGEST-MD5 authentication instead may work. Also, the > use of TLS may allow SquirrelMail to

Re: [SM-USERS] The IMAP server is reporting that plain text logins are disabled.

2005-01-31 Thread Ean Kingston
> I have installed squirrelmail on Linux SuSE 9.0 when i try to login the > next > error apear > > ERROR: > Bad request: The IMAP server is reporting that plain text logins are > disabled. > Using CRAM-MD5 or DIGEST-MD5 authentication instead may work. Also, the > use of > TLS may allow SquirrelMa

[SM-USERS] The IMAP server is reporting that plain text logins are disabled.

2005-01-31 Thread Javier Santos
I have installed squirrelmail on Linux SuSE 9.0 when i try to login the next error apear ERROR: Bad request: The IMAP server is reporting that plain text logins are disabled. Using CRAM-MD5 or DIGEST-MD5 authentication instead may work. Also, the use of TLS may allow SquirrelMail to login. Ple

[SM-USERS] The Weather Channel Plugin

2005-01-13 Thread Matt
Hi, Is there anywork being done to fix the weather channel plugin.. or does someone need to start doing that? --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It

Re: [SM-USERS] The page cannot be displayed

2004-12-08 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> I'm getting a "The page cannot be displayed" when I try to forward an > email with an attachement. The attachement is 1.2m is there a setting > that donesn't allow attachements over a certain amount? increase memory limit in php. -- Tomas ---

RE: [SM-USERS] The page cannot be displayed

2004-12-08 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy Richard > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 11:08 AM > To: Squirrelmail > Subject: [SM-USERS] The page cannot be displayed > > I'm getting a "Th

[SM-USERS] The page cannot be displayed

2004-12-08 Thread Troy Richard
I'm getting a "The page cannot be displayed" when I try to forward an email with an attachement. The attachement is 1.2m is there a setting that donesn't allow attachements over a certain amount? Thanks troy --- SF email is sponsored by - The

[SM-USERS] The page cannot be displayed

2003-10-21 Thread Gareth
Hi Guys I'm running SquirrelMail 1.4.1, with PHP 4.2.2 and Apache 2.0.40 on Redhat Linux 8.0. When ever I send an email using compose or reply, when pressing 'send' I always get an IE error, 'The page cannot be displayed' - but the message does send, and appears in my sent folder. The page URL is

[SM-USERS] The page cannot be displayed

2003-10-21 Thread Gareth
Hi Guys I'm running SquirrelMail 1.4.1, with PHP 4.2.2 and Apache 2.0.40 on Redhat Linux 8.0. When ever I send an email using compose or reply, when pressing 'send' I always get an IE error, 'The page cannot be displayed' - but the message does send, and appears in my sent folder. The page URL is

Re: [SM-USERS] The squirrelmail RPM overwrites default_pref

2003-10-14 Thread Peter Kiem
Hi, > Hmm... Well, it's not entirely my fault, as config files should remain > in the config directory. I will work around it in the RPM, but this is, > perhaps, something that should be done upstream. Agreed that config files should remain in /etc. Why not keep the default_pref file fully in /e

Re: [SM-USERS] The squirrelmail RPM overwrites default_pref

2003-10-14 Thread Brian S. Bergin
At 08:20 14 10 03 Tuesday, you wrote: On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 08:06, Brian S. Bergin wrote: > There's always the possibility that the file format may change so it > should import the old prefs into a new file if it must be overwritten > with the original saved as default_pref.bak. No, it shouldn't.

Re: [SM-USERS] The squirrelmail RPM overwrites default_pref

2003-10-14 Thread Konstantin Riabitsev
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 08:06, Brian S. Bergin wrote: > There's always the possibility that the file format may change so it > should import the old prefs into a new file if it must be overwritten > with the original saved as default_pref.bak. No, it shouldn't. Overwriting config files is a bad idea

Re: [SM-USERS] The squirrelmail RPM overwrites default_pref

2003-10-14 Thread Konstantin Riabitsev
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 01:13, Peter Kiem wrote: > Hi, > > I recently upgraded my squirrelmail installation using the > squirrelmail-1.4.2-0.1.7.x.noarch.rpm on a Red Hat 7.3 system and it > overwrite my /var/lib/squirrelmail/prefs/default_pref file. Hmm... Well, it's not entirely my fault, as conf

Re: [SM-USERS] The squirrelmail RPM overwrites default_pref

2003-10-14 Thread Brian S. Bergin
At 01:13 14 10 03 Tuesday, you wrote: I recently upgraded my squirrelmail installation using the squirrelmail-1.4.2-0.1.7.x.noarch.rpm on a Red Hat 7.3 system and it overwrite my /var/lib/squirrelmail/prefs/default_pref file. I have customised this file to provide better defaults for my new user

[SM-USERS] The squirrelmail RPM overwrites default_pref

2003-10-13 Thread Peter Kiem
Hi, I recently upgraded my squirrelmail installation using the squirrelmail-1.4.2-0.1.7.x.noarch.rpm on a Red Hat 7.3 system and it overwrite my /var/lib/squirrelmail/prefs/default_pref file. I have customised this file to provide better defaults for my new users and had to get it back from backu

FW: [SM-USERS] The HTML Compose Add-In

2003-03-12 Thread David Iyoha
> > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SM-USERS] The HTML Compose Add-In > > << File: [SM-USERS] The HTML Compose Add-In.txt >> <>

Re: [SM-USERS] The HTML Compose Add-In

2003-03-12 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Superbenk, On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... > I recently switched from Fancy Text to Plain Text for my compose method on > IE (I have the Fancy Text installed, obviously) and posted to another > mailing list. One person replied with the following: > It looks like yo

[SM-USERS] The HTML Compose Add-In

2003-03-12 Thread superbenk
I recently switched from Fancy Text to Plain Text for my compose method on IE (I have the Fancy Text installed, obviously) and posted to another mailing list. One person replied with the following: It looks like your email client has a bug. It is setting mimetype to $email_type which standard mai