Again, in alignment with other posts...you must ask your users
what they use thier MUA for. At one of my sites with similar
users/usage, I would find quite a fight to move people to squirrelmail
only. Mainly because of:
1) reminders, todo, calendar
reminders/todo are available as plugins
calendar
The company I work for has been running exchange 5.5. We have had corrupt
databases multiple times with this exchange server. It has been decided
that this exchange server needs to be replaced. I have setup a
postfix+procmail+dovcot-imap+spamassassin+squirrelmail server and have
migrated some of ou
> It looks like Squirrelmail can use multiple address books with Development
> Version 1.5.0
Older versions can do that too. It is just not that easy.
1.5.1cvs allows to do more things without modifying functions/addressbook.php
--
Tomas
---
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:44:16PM -0700, Avery Day wrote:
>> Does anyone think going completely webmail based using squirrelmail for
>> the MUA is a bad idea? Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Is
>> there anyone in this mailing list that has done this before? If so I
>> would
>> lo
>
>> Wow 5000 users on this one little machine with only 512 memory. If I had
>> to take a guess I would say to add 2 or maybe even 3 gigs of ram to this
>> machine. Probly just adding more ram alone will solve alot of your
>> problems.
>
> Almost certainly. I'm also considering moving SM to anot
Avery Day said:
>>
>
> Dovecot can use both mbox and maildir. I have it setup to use maildir.
> Dovecot claims to be the fastest and most secure. But I think anyone who
> is claiming to be the most secure is asking for trouble myself. It claims
> to use less memory than all of the other imap serv
> Wow 5000 users on this one little machine with only 512 memory. If I had
> to take a guess I would say to add 2 or maybe even 3 gigs of ram to this
> machine. Probly just adding more ram alone will solve alot of your
> problems.
Almost certainly. I'm also considering moving SM to another box fr
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:44:16PM -0700, Avery Day wrote:
>> Does anyone think going completely webmail based using squirrelmail for
>> the MUA is a bad idea? Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Is
>> there anyone in this mailing list that has done this before? If so I
>> would
>> lo
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 07:45:09AM -0700, Avery Day wrote:
>
> I have looked at both cyrus and courier. The complete blackbox setup that
> cyrus can do seems to be its major selling point.
Also the extremely flexible ACL system (best I've seen of any IMAP
server, open or proprietary). The delive
> Avery Day wrote:
>> postfix+procmail+dovcot-imap+spamassassin+squirrelmail server [...]
>> We are looking at going completely
>> webmail based for the MUA in our company using squirrelmail. We have
>> around 35 users and only 6 gigs of email. My guess is we send and
>> receive
>> as a whole on
> Quoting Avery Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [snip]
>> I will be running this server on a PE2650, raid 5, single xeon 2.4Ghz,
>> with 1 gig of ram. I think this server can handle what I need it for
>> easy
>> enough. Does anyone see this differently?
>>
>> Advise is very welcome, so please don't he
>> The company I work for has been running exchange 5.5. We have had
>> corrupt
>> databases multiple times with this exchange server. It has been decided
>> that this exchange server needs to be replaced. I have setup a
>> postfix+procmail+dovcot-imap+spamassassin+squirrelmail server and have
>>
>
>> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:44:16PM -0700, Avery Day wrote:
>>> Does anyone think going completely webmail based using squirrelmail for
>>> the MUA is a bad idea? Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Is
>>> there anyone in this mailing list that has done this before? If so I
>>> woul
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:44:16PM -0700, Avery Day wrote:
>> Does anyone think going completely webmail based using squirrelmail for
>> the MUA is a bad idea? Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Is
>> there anyone in this mailing list that has done this before? If so I
>> would
>> lov
Avery Day wrote:
postfix+procmail+dovcot-imap+spamassassin+squirrelmail server [...]
We are looking at going completely
webmail based for the MUA in our company using squirrelmail. We have
around 35 users and only 6 gigs of email. My guess is we send and receive
as a whole on average about 300 emai
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:44:16PM -0700, Avery Day wrote:
> Does anyone think going completely webmail based using squirrelmail for
> the MUA is a bad idea? Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Is
> there anyone in this mailing list that has done this before? If so I would
> love to hear
Quoting Avery Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> I will be running this server on a PE2650, raid 5, single xeon 2.4Ghz,
> with 1 gig of ram. I think this server can handle what I need it for easy
> enough. Does anyone see this differently?
>
> Advise is very welcome, so please don't hesitate.
>
E
> The company I work for has been running exchange 5.5. We have had corrupt
> databases multiple times with this exchange server. It has been decided
> that this exchange server needs to be replaced. I have setup a
> postfix+procmail+dovcot-imap+spamassassin+squirrelmail server and have
> migrated
18 matches
Mail list logo
