Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail REALLY slow

2004-09-22 Thread Ean Kingston
On September 22, 2004 03:16 pm, Jim wrote: > Hello, > > I am running Qmail + Courier IMAP + Vmailmgr + Apache 1.3.1 on an 850MHz > Pentium III with 256 megs of memory. This acts as mailserver for > approximately 500 users. > > Without apache running, I have very low cpu usage, and a load average o

RE: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail REALLY slow

2004-09-22 Thread David T. Wilson
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 12:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail REALLY slow Hello, I am running Qmail + Courier IMAP + Vmailmgr + Apache 1.3.1 on an 850MHz Pentium

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail REALLY slow

2004-09-22 Thread Jim
I'm running Squirrelmail 1.4.3a... My mailbox is not large, as I typically check my mail with POP and delete it off the server. There were probably around a dozen messages taking up less than a meg. I have only the squirrelspell plugin activated. As a quick fix, I installed squirrelmail on anot

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail REALLY slow

2004-09-22 Thread p dont think
I am running Qmail + Courier IMAP + Vmailmgr + Apache 1.3.1 on an 850MHz Pentium III with 256 megs of memory. This acts as mailserver for approximately 500 users. Without apache running, I have very low cpu usage, and a load average of around 0.5 - 1.5... When I start apache, everything is ok unti

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail REALLY slow

2004-09-22 Thread Jim
Hello, I am running Qmail + Courier IMAP + Vmailmgr + Apache 1.3.1 on an 850MHz Pentium III with 256 megs of memory. This acts as mailserver for approximately 500 users. Without apache running, I have very low cpu usage, and a load average of around 0.5 - 1.5... When I start apache, everything