Hi,
When I try to have access a folder with 99 MB using SM 1.4.5 appears the
following error:
ERROR:
ERROR: Conecction broken by imap server.
Query: EXAMINE "folder-name-with-99MB"
In the maillog appears the message:
imap(username): file mbox-rewrite.c: line 429 (mbox_write_header):
assertio
> I'm looking for help in identifying why messages sent through my
> squirrelmail reveal 127.0.0.1 and my username in the header of the
> outgoing message, yet when I send email using an imap client like
> Thunderbird that information isn't there.
"Received: from mail.mydomain.com ([xx.xx.xx.xx])"
I'm looking for help in identifying why messages
sent through my squirrelmail reveal 127.0.0.1 and my username in the header of
the outgoing message, yet when I send email using an imap client like
Thunderbird that information isn't there.
Here is a sample header:
X-Message-Status: n:0X-S
>> May 14, 2005 is not recent enough for you?
>
> More than recent enough... But, last I heard, it was in active
> development so I was just making sure.
As ever. But its current featureset is reasonably stable. Development
from here will be focused on adding TODOs, notifications (reminders),
p
> May 14, 2005 is not recent enough for you?
More than recent enough... But, last I heard, it was in active
development so I was just making sure. This plugin really
kicks ass, BTW.
> Haven't heard much more than a whisper lately. Seems fine. Changes in SM
> core between 1.4.4 and 1.4.5 are
>
>> It is my proud pleasure to announce the final release of SquirrelMail
>> 1.4.5.
>>
>> This release is very important, and we strongly advise everybody to
>> update to the latest release.
>
> Hey folks,
>
>I'm gearing up to upgrade my production 1.4.4 instance to 1.4.5,
> and I just wante
>>I'm gearing up to upgrade my production 1.4.4 instance to 1.4.5,
>> and I just wanted to know if anyone was using the new shared
>> calendar with it? I haven't seen a new version of the shared
>> calendar come out recently, so I was curious. Some of my users
>> use it rather heavily, so I
On Fri, August 5, 2005 3:02 pm, C. Bensend wrote:
>
>> It is my proud pleasure to announce the final release of SquirrelMail
>> 1.4.5.
>>
>> This release is very important, and we strongly advise everybody to
>> update to the latest release.
>
> Hey folks,
>
>I'm gearing up to upgrade my produc
> It is my proud pleasure to announce the final release of SquirrelMail
> 1.4.5.
>
> This release is very important, and we strongly advise everybody to
> update to the latest release.
Hey folks,
I'm gearing up to upgrade my production 1.4.4 instance to 1.4.5,
and I just wanted to know if any