[SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.4.5

2006-06-20 Thread Clovis Tristao
Hi, When I try to have access a folder with 99 MB using SM 1.4.5 appears the following error: ERROR: ERROR: Conecction broken by imap server. Query: EXAMINE "folder-name-with-99MB" In the maillog appears the message: imap(username): file mbox-rewrite.c: line 429 (mbox_write_header): assertio

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail 1.4.5 - header of sent messages shows ([127.0.0.1] helo=mydomain.com ident=www-data)

2006-01-08 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> I'm looking for help in identifying why messages sent through my > squirrelmail reveal 127.0.0.1 and my username in the header of the > outgoing message, yet when I send email using an imap client like > Thunderbird that information isn't there. "Received: from mail.mydomain.com ([xx.xx.xx.xx])"

[SM-USERS] squirrelmail 1.4.5 - header of sent messages shows ([127.0.0.1] helo=mydomain.com ident=www-data)

2006-01-08 Thread Paul
I'm looking for help in identifying why messages sent through my squirrelmail reveal 127.0.0.1 and my username in the header of the outgoing message, yet when I send email using an imap client like Thunderbird that information isn't there.   Here is a sample header:   X-Message-Status: n:0X-S

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.4.5 Released

2005-08-06 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
>> May 14, 2005 is not recent enough for you? > > More than recent enough... But, last I heard, it was in active > development so I was just making sure. As ever. But its current featureset is reasonably stable. Development from here will be focused on adding TODOs, notifications (reminders), p

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.4.5 Released

2005-08-06 Thread C. Bensend
> May 14, 2005 is not recent enough for you? More than recent enough... But, last I heard, it was in active development so I was just making sure. This plugin really kicks ass, BTW. > Haven't heard much more than a whisper lately. Seems fine. Changes in SM > core between 1.4.4 and 1.4.5 are

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.4.5 Released

2005-08-05 Thread p dont think
> >> It is my proud pleasure to announce the final release of SquirrelMail >> 1.4.5. >> >> This release is very important, and we strongly advise everybody to >> update to the latest release. > > Hey folks, > >I'm gearing up to upgrade my production 1.4.4 instance to 1.4.5, > and I just wante

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.4.5 Released

2005-08-05 Thread C. Bensend
>>I'm gearing up to upgrade my production 1.4.4 instance to 1.4.5, >> and I just wanted to know if anyone was using the new shared >> calendar with it? I haven't seen a new version of the shared >> calendar come out recently, so I was curious. Some of my users >> use it rather heavily, so I

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.4.5 Released

2005-08-05 Thread Michael Martinell
On Fri, August 5, 2005 3:02 pm, C. Bensend wrote: > >> It is my proud pleasure to announce the final release of SquirrelMail >> 1.4.5. >> >> This release is very important, and we strongly advise everybody to >> update to the latest release. > > Hey folks, > >I'm gearing up to upgrade my produc

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.4.5 Released

2005-08-05 Thread C. Bensend
> It is my proud pleasure to announce the final release of SquirrelMail > 1.4.5. > > This release is very important, and we strongly advise everybody to > update to the latest release. Hey folks, I'm gearing up to upgrade my production 1.4.4 instance to 1.4.5, and I just wanted to know if any