On Wed, June 24, 2009 5:25 pm, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>>> FWIW, I use a large number of filters. Turning them off significantly
>>> speeds up inbox load time. But, increases my wasted
>>> human-sorting time
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Do you use a lot of message filters?
>>
>> I have a lot of filters, but I p
>> FWIW, I use a large number of filters. Turning them off significantly
>> speeds up inbox load time. But, increases my wasted
>> human-sorting time
>> :-)
>>
>> Do you use a lot of message filters?
>
> I have a lot of filters, but I put them on the server using procmail, so
> my inbox loads quick
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:03:56 -0400, Piet Slaghekke
wrote:
>
>Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:27 -0400, Piet Slaghekke
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your
>>> solutions could be shared with m
Using an IMAP Proxy might fix some issues on serverside.
Specially on large installations with lots of users with large inboxes, it
helps on decreasing disk access everytime u refresh ur inbox..
I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of
your solutions could be
>>> I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of
>>> your solutions could be shared with me.
>>>
>>> I am using SM version: 1.4.10a
>>
>> Upgrade, 1.4.10 is 2 years old, and has several known security issues.
>
> Yes agreed.
>
>>> If a user as an inbox of more than 2000 mess
Wm Mussatto wrote:
On Thu, June 11, 2009 14:05, Piet Slaghekke wrote:
Thanks everyone for your responses.I do not have any filtering
configured.
Also I have followed all the optimizations in the documentation.When
I have a users with a new mailbox everything loads very fast, it seems
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:27 -0400, Piet Slaghekke
wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your
solutions could be shared with me.
I am using SM version: 1.4.10a
Upgrade, 1.4.10 is 2 years old, and has se
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:27 -0400, Piet Slaghekke
wrote:
>Hello everyone,
>
>I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your
>solutions could be shared with me.
>
>I am using SM version: 1.4.10a
Upgrade, 1.4.10 is 2 years old, and has several known security issues.
>I
On Thu, June 11, 2009 14:05, Piet Slaghekke wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your responses.I do not have any filtering
> configured.
>
> Also I have followed all the optimizations in the documentation.When
> I have a users with a new mailbox everything loads very fast, it seems
> to only occur
Thanks everyone for your responses.I do not have any filtering
configured.
Also I have followed all the optimizations in the documentation.When
I have a users with a new mailbox everything loads very fast, it seems
to only occur with users who have many folders and large inboxes.<-
On Thu, June 11, 2009 2:19 pm, Randal T. Rioux wrote:
> On Thu, June 11, 2009 3:51 pm, i...@braha.nl wrote:
>>> Thanks William,
>>>
>>> Ok here are some more details:
>>>
>>> Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is
>>> set to True.
>>>
>> I run the same software on a
On Thu, June 11, 2009 3:51 pm, i...@braha.nl wrote:
>> Thanks William,
>>
>> Ok here are some more details:
>>
>> Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is
>> set to True.
>>
> I run the same software on a 7 year old P4 machine, and have boxes of
> 8000+ mails. Never had
> Thanks William,
>
> Ok here are some more details:
>
> Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is
> set to True.
>
I run the same software on a 7 year old P4 machine, and have boxes of
8000+ mails. Never had this trouble.
Maybe you read up on optimizing the speed, ther
Thanks William,
Ok here are some more details:
Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is
set to True.
hope that helps.
Wm Mussatto wrote:
On Thu, June 11, 2009 08:47, Piet Slaghekke wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am sure more people have had issues with this a
On Thu, June 11, 2009 08:47, Piet Slaghekke wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your
> solutions could be shared with me.
>
> I am using SM version: 1.4.10a
>
> If a user as an inbox of more than 2000 messages it may take SM 1 +
> minutes
Hello everyone,
I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your
solutions could be shared with me.
I am using SM version: 1.4.10a
If a user as an inbox of more than 2000 messages it may take SM 1 +
minutes to load. Sometimes it will give the folloing error message:
16 matches
Mail list logo
