Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN and connection to outgoing SMTP server over TLS give me Server error: (0) and link to list over known bugs not working from the bug plugin

2018-04-21 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 2018年04月21日 03:51, Anders Boholdt-Petersen wrote: > Hi Paul and everyone on this mailing list > > ---Paul wrote--- >> SquirrelMail supports STARTTLS. If I recall correctly, you set >> $use_smtp_tls to 2 in config.php > --- > I has checked the config.php file, and here the value already is s

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN and connection to outgoing SMTP server over TLS give me Server error: (0) and link to list over known bugs not working from the bug plugin

2018-04-21 Thread Anders Boholdt-Petersen
Hi Paul and everyone on this mailing list ---Paul wrote--- > SquirrelMail supports STARTTLS. If I recall correctly, you set > $use_smtp_tls to 2 in config.php --- I has checked the config.php file, and here the value already is set to "2" via the administrator plugin from version 1.5.23. > Act

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN and connection to outgoing SMTP server over TLS give me Server error: (0) and link to list over known bugs not working from the bug plugin

2018-04-19 Thread Paul Lesniewski
>> ---Paul wrote--- >> SquirrelMail supports STARTTLS. If I recall correctly, you set >> $use_smtp_tls to 2 in config.php >> --- >> But I only has changed the communication to the SMTP-server via the >> administrative plugin to "STARTTLS". Will this plugin change the settings in >> the config.php

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN and connection to outgoing SMTP server over TLS give me Server error: (0) and link to list over known bugs not working from the bug plugin

2018-04-19 Thread Paul Lesniewski
> ---Paul wrote--- > SquirrelMail supports STARTTLS. If I recall correctly, you set > $use_smtp_tls to 2 in config.php > --- > But I only has changed the communication to the SMTP-server via the > administrative plugin to "STARTTLS". Will this plugin change the settings in > the config.php file?

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN and connection to outgoing SMTP server over TLS give me Server error: (0) and link to list over known bugs not working from the bug plugin

2018-04-08 Thread Anders Boholdt-Petersen
Hi Paul ---Paul wrote--- SquirrelMail supports STARTTLS. If I recall correctly, you set $use_smtp_tls to 2 in config.php --- But I only has changed the communication to the SMTP-server via the administrative plugin to "STARTTLS". Will this plugin change the settings in the config.php file? Is my

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN and connection to outgoing SMTP server over TLS give me Server error: (0) and link to list over known bugs not working from the bug plugin

2018-04-07 Thread Paul Lesniewski
> Now I has communicated with my hosting company. They write me that the > outgoing SMTP-server only can be accessed on port 25 and 587. Therefore I > will mean that I not can use the TLS-option in SquirrelMail, since my > hosting company use STARTTLS over port 587. SquirrelMail supports STARTTLS.

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN and connection to outgoing SMTP server over TLS give me Server error: (0) and link to list over known bugs not working from the bug plugin

2018-04-07 Thread Anders Boholdt-Petersen
Hi Paul Thanks for your answers. ---Paul Wrote--- Are you sure it requires a TLS connection from the outset? Normally port 587 is used with STARTTLS, where the connection is plaintext and then upgraded. Sometimes you can connect to port 465 with TLS. --- Now I has communicated with my hosting com

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN and connection to outgoing SMTP server over TLS give me Server error: (0) and link to list over known bugs not working from the bug plugin

2018-04-07 Thread Anders Boholdt-Petersen
Hi Paul Thanks for your answers. ---Paul Wrote--- Are you sure it requires a TLS connection from the outset? Normally port 587 is used with STARTTLS, where the connection is plaintext and then upgraded. Sometimes you can connect to port 465 with TLS. --- Now I has communicated with my hosting com

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN and connection to outgoing SMTP server over TLS give me Server error: (0) and link to list over known bugs not working from the bug plugin

2018-04-06 Thread Paul Lesniewski
> 1. My Hosting company has an outgoing SMTP-server there is open on port 587. > When I will connect to the server over TLS, I should also use port 587. > > > > Therefore I first has selected "Secure IMAP (TLS)" in the option called > "SMTP Connection Security", and next entered port 587 in the

[SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN and connection to outgoing SMTP server over TLS give me Server error: (0) and link to list over known bugs not working from the bug plugin

2018-03-19 Thread Anders Boholdt-Petersen
Hi everyone First, sorry for my many e-mails here on this list, but I find some challenge with Squirrel Mail 1.5.2 SVN. 1. My Hosting company has an outgoing SMTP-server there is open on port 587. When I will connect to the server over TLS, I should also use port 587. Therefore I first

[SM-USERS] squirrel mail issue

2016-08-09 Thread maheshadmin
hi , i am using Centos 6.5 operating system. i am configured DNS server i used below link configured squirrel mail . http://suresh-chandra.blogspot.in/2012/10/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none.html now i am able to login with user . but i need to login u...@domain.com what setting we

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail license

2013-04-20 Thread Paul Lesniewski
Marson, On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Marson Jesse wrote: > Hello Squirrel mail > > Thank you for your responses. I am sorry but I have one further question I > really need to qualify. On your website it says that: > > Licenses are $0 per license when purchased in small quantities (1-50) > B

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail license

2013-04-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 20.04.2013 03:23, schrieb Marson Jesse: > Thank you for your responses. I am sorry but I have one further > question I really need to qualify. On your website it says that: > > * Licenses are $0 per license when purchased in small quantities (1-50) > * Bulk licenses are $0 each (51-500) >

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail license

2013-04-19 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Marson Jesse wrote > Hello Squirrel mail > > Thank you for your responses. I am sorry but I have one further question > I > really need to qualify. On your website it says that: > >- Licenses are $0 per license when purchased in small quantities (1-50) >- Bulk licenses are $0 each (51-5

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail license

2013-04-19 Thread Marson Jesse
Hello Squirrel mail Thank you for your responses. I am sorry but I have one further question I really need to qualify. On your website it says that: - Licenses are $0 per license when purchased in small quantities (1-50) - Bulk licenses are $0 each (51-500) - If you need more licenses

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail license

2013-04-15 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
2013.04.15 19:23 michael crane rašė: > On 15/04/2013, Fredrik Jervfors wrote: > >> The full license text for GPL can be found here: >> http://squirrelmail.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/squirrelmail/branches/SM-1_4-STABLE/squirrelmail/doc/COPYING?revision=13456 >> >> Also see: >> http://en.wikipedia.

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail license

2013-04-15 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
2013.04.15 14:35 Marson Jesse rašė: > Dear Squirrel Mail > > I am interested in Squirrel Mail service, however because it is such a > unique concept, I just want to confirm that "there are no strings > attached" and that this is a real license. I am sorry for the sceptical > question. SquirrelMa

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail license

2013-04-15 Thread michael crane
On 15/04/2013, Fredrik Jervfors wrote: > The full license text for GPL can be found here: > http://squirrelmail.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/squirrelmail/branches/SM-1_4-STABLE/squirrelmail/doc/COPYING?revision=13456 > > Also see: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License I tried t

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail license

2013-04-15 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> I am interested in Squirrel Mail service, however because it is such a > unique concept, I just want to confirm that "there are no strings > attached" and that this is a real license. I am sorry for the sceptical > question. SquirrelMail is free software released under GPL v2. It doesn't cost y

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail license

2013-04-15 Thread Carl Carpenter
I will be mostly out of the office from 4/12-22 with limited access to email during that time. If you need assistance during that time, you can contact Lloyd at lhemm...@hillcountry.org. If this is a technical problem, please submit a work order in order to get the fastest response possible.

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.1

2012-03-05 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
2012.03.05 12:49 Goutam Baul rašė: > Dear List, > > A number of plug-ins available at the squirrel mail site talks about the > version 1.5.1. But we find that the latest download is 1.4.22. > > Could you kindly let me know how we can get the latest version of the > Squirrel Mail? Get 1.5.2-svn ver

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.1

2012-03-05 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> A number of plug-ins available at the squirrel mail site talks about the > version 1.5.1. But we find that the latest download is 1.4.22. SquirrelMail 1.5.1 is removed due to security issues with that version. > Could you kindly let me know how we can get the latest version of the > Squirrel Ma

[SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.5.1

2012-03-05 Thread Goutam Baul
Dear List, A number of plug-ins available at the squirrel mail site talks about the version 1.5.1. But we find that the latest download is 1.4.22. Could you kindly let me know how we can get the latest version of the Squirrel Mail? Some of the plug-ins such as Check-Quota, Auto-Complete, Downloa

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail does not show emails

2011-06-01 Thread Benedict simon
Dear zhang, Hve u installed any new pluggin.. do u have view as html pluggin installed .. if so just try to disable the the above pluggin in config /perl conf.pl and check it out regards simon > > Hey guys I'm using ubuntu lucid with postfix and dovecot. I can send and > receive emails with

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail does not show emails

2011-06-01 Thread michael crane
On Sat, May 28, 2011 6:15 am, Le Zhang wrote: > > Hey guys I'm using ubuntu lucid with postfix and dovecot. I can send and > receive emails with the server fine, and even can send email through > squirrelmail. But for some strange reason the inbox for squirrel mail is > always empty. Though /var/m

[SM-USERS] Squirrel mail does not show emails

2011-06-01 Thread Le Zhang
Hey guys I'm using ubuntu lucid with postfix and dovecot. I can send and receive emails with the server fine, and even can send email through squirrelmail. But for some strange reason the inbox for squirrel mail is always empty. Though /var/mail/user has my mails. I'm really lost on how to troubl

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail does not show emails

2011-05-28 Thread Mathew J. Newton
On Sat, May 28, 2011 7:36 am, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > I can send and >> receive emails with the server fine, and even can send email through >> squirrelmail. But for some strange reason the inbox for squirrel mail is >> always empty. Though /var/mail/user has my mails. >> >> I'm really lost on how

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail does not show emails

2011-05-27 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Le Zhang wrote: > > Hey guys I'm using ubuntu lucid with postfix and dovecot. I can send and > receive emails with the server fine, and even can send email through > squirrelmail. But for some strange reason the inbox for squirrel mail is > always empty. Though /var/mail/user has my mails. > >

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail - alternate login fails in version 1.4.21

2010-09-23 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
2010.09.22 12:39 P Sreedhar rašė: > Dear sir > > The problem seems solved with increasing MAXPERIP setting value in > Courier-IMAP > configuration. The default was 4. And seems to me that since squirrelmail > uses the localhost (127.0.0.1), the problem occured. > The problem however is not existin

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail - alternate login fails in version 1.4.21

2010-09-22 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
P Sreedhar wrote: > > Sorry I Missed details in earlier mail > 1) Same problem does not exist in version 1.4.15 > 2) Server is not secured with HTTPS > 3) PHP Ini details are as below. > > PHP Version 5.1.6 > ... > session > Session Support enabled > Registered save handlers files user > Regi

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail - alternate login fails in version 1.4.21

2010-09-21 Thread P Sreedhar
Dear sir The problem does not exist with 1.4.15. Regards P Sreedhar ---Original Message--- From: Tomas Kuliavas Date: 09/21/10 02:25:09 To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail - alternate login fails in version 1.4 21 P Sreedhar

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail - alternate login fails in version 1.4.21

2010-09-20 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
P Sreedhar wrote: > > Squirrel mail login fails alternately. (Once success second time failure) > > Details below > 1) Login authentication fails alternatlely. First time it reaches upto > webmail.php and error message is "You must be logged in to view this page" > is displayed. > 2) After Clic

[SM-USERS] Squirrel mail - alternate login fails in version 1.4.21

2010-09-19 Thread P Sreedhar
Dear Sir/Madam, Squirrel mail login fails alternately. (Once success second time failure) Details below 1) Login authentication fails alternatlely. First time it reaches upto webmail.php and error message is "You must be logged in to view this page" is displayed. 2) After Clicking

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail and apache modsecurity2

2010-08-06 Thread Laurent HENRY (EHESS/CRI)
Le Ven 6 août 2010 19:40, Tomas Kuliavas a écrit : > 2010.08.06 11:22 Laurent HENRY rašė: >> Le Friday 06 August 2010 09:00:12 Tomas Kuliavas, vous avez écrit : >>> 2010.08.05 18:48 Laurent HENRY rašė: >>> > Hello, >>> > I try to make squirrelmail 1.4.21 and modsecurity2 work together. >>

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail and apache modsecurity2

2010-08-06 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
2010.08.06 11:22 Laurent HENRY rašė: > Le Friday 06 August 2010 09:00:12 Tomas Kuliavas, vous avez écrit : >> 2010.08.05 18:48 Laurent HENRY rašė: >> > Hello, >> > I try to make squirrelmail 1.4.21 and modsecurity2 work together. >> > >> > I am triggering a false positive while trying to send a m

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail and apache modsecurity2

2010-08-06 Thread Laurent HENRY
Le Friday 06 August 2010 09:00:12 Tomas Kuliavas, vous avez écrit : > 2010.08.05 18:48 Laurent HENRY rašė: > > Hello, > > I try to make squirrelmail 1.4.21 and modsecurity2 work together. > > > > I am triggering a false positive while trying to send a mail. > > > > ModSecurity: Access denied with

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail and apache modsecurity2

2010-08-06 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
2010.08.05 18:48 Laurent HENRY rašė: > Hello, > I try to make squirrelmail 1.4.21 and modsecurity2 work together. > > I am triggering a false positive while trying to send a mail. > > ModSecurity: Access denied with code 403 (phase 2). Match of "eq 0" > against "MULTIPART_UNMATCHED_BOUNDARY" requ

[SM-USERS] squirrel mail and apache modsecurity2

2010-08-05 Thread Laurent HENRY
Hello, I try to make squirrelmail 1.4.21 and modsecurity2 work together. I am triggering a false positive while trying to send a mail. ModSecurity: Access denied with code 403 (phase 2). Match of "eq 0" against "MULTIPART_UNMATCHED_BOUNDARY" required. [file "/etc/apache2/conf.d/mod_security2.

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail log in problems

2010-05-03 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Chris Jackson wrote: > > Hi I need some help every time I try to log on to squirrel mail in a web > browser I get the following message > > SquirrelMail version 1.4.7 > By the SquirrelMail Project Team > ERROR > Preference file, > ../../squirrelmail-data/ch...@ch

[SM-USERS] Squirrel mail log in problems

2010-05-02 Thread Chris Jackson
Hi I need some help every time I try to log on to squirrel mail in a web browser I get the following message SquirrelMail version 1.4.7 By the SquirrelMail Project Team ERROR Preference file, ../../squirrelmail-data/ch...@chrisjackson- personaltraining.co.uk.pref, could not be opened. Contact

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail Phish?

2009-09-11 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> Thanks for the response, but I am still concerned you are missing my > concern. > > It seems that SOMEONE is specifically targeting SquirrelMail web > application users. > > At the very least, admins should know that if the link I provided is > malicious, the chance is high that users are going t

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail Phish?

2009-09-10 Thread Beverly Howard
Thanks for the response, but I am still concerned you are missing my concern. It seems that SOMEONE is specifically targeting SquirrelMail web application users. At the very least, admins should know that if the link I provided is malicious, the chance is high that users are going to come to t

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail Phish?

2009-09-10 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
>>> Based on how you present the problem... << >>> > > Before I leave, was my post of concern containing headers and full > information ever received or are you referring to my "black hole" post? All I ever saw was the black hole post. I didn't see any post with headers and full information. Never

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail Phish?

2009-09-10 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
> Posting Problems? (my messages seem to be going to a black hole) Based on how you present the problem, I draw the conclusion that you're not the system administrator. You need to contact your system administrator for support. I'm sorry, but this forum won't be able to help you. http://squirrel

[SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail Phish?

2009-09-09 Thread Beverly Howard
Posting Problems? (my messages seem to be going to a black hole) Beverly Howard -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deploym

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-25 Thread Karl Pearson
On Wed, June 24, 2009 5:25 pm, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >>> FWIW, I use a large number of filters. Turning them off significantly >>> speeds up inbox load time. But, increases my wasted >>> human-sorting time >>> :-) >>> >>> Do you use a lot of message filters? >> >> I have a lot of filters, but I p

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-24 Thread Paul Lesniewski
>> FWIW, I use a large number of filters. Turning them off significantly >> speeds up inbox load time. But, increases my wasted >> human-sorting time >> :-) >> >> Do you use a lot of message filters? > > I have a lot of filters, but I put them on the server using procmail, so > my inbox loads quick

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-12 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:03:56 -0400, Piet Slaghekke wrote: > >Jonathan Angliss wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:27 -0400, Piet Slaghekke >> wrote: >> >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your >>> solutions could be shared with m

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-12 Thread Oguzhan Kayhan
Using an IMAP Proxy might fix some issues on serverside. Specially on large installations with lots of users with large inboxes, it helps on decreasing disk access everytime u refresh ur inbox.. I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your solutions could be

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-12 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
>>> I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of >>> your solutions could be shared with me. >>> >>> I am using SM version: 1.4.10a >> >> Upgrade, 1.4.10 is 2 years old, and has several known security issues. > > Yes agreed. > >>> If a user as an inbox of more than 2000 mess

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-12 Thread Piet Slaghekke
Wm Mussatto wrote: On Thu, June 11, 2009 14:05, Piet Slaghekke wrote: Thanks everyone for your responses.I do not have any filtering configured. Also I have followed all the optimizations in the documentation.When I have a users with a new mailbox everything loads very fast, it seems

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-12 Thread Piet Slaghekke
Jonathan Angliss wrote: On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:27 -0400, Piet Slaghekke wrote: Hello everyone, I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your solutions could be shared with me. I am using SM version: 1.4.10a Upgrade, 1.4.10 is 2 years old, and has se

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-12 Thread Nieuwslezer
You wrote: > > On Thu, June 11, 2009 5:13 am, Nieuwslezer wrote: > > You wrote: > > > >> > > > On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: > > > > Hello, > >> > > > > > je...@u-impression.com --> SquirrelMail-users (2009-06-09 15:40:25 > > > > +0800): > > > > > I must say that this email re

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:27 -0400, Piet Slaghekke wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your >solutions could be shared with me. > >I am using SM version: 1.4.10a Upgrade, 1.4.10 is 2 years old, and has several known security issues. >I

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Wm Mussatto
On Thu, June 11, 2009 14:05, Piet Slaghekke wrote: > Thanks everyone for your responses.I do not have any filtering > configured. > > Also I have followed all the optimizations in the documentation.When > I have a users with a new mailbox everything loads very fast, it seems > to only occur

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-11 Thread Chris Hilts
Juan Hernandez wrote: > ehh are we going to keep this threat alive by answering to all this > pointless BS? No, of course not. Oops. -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified l

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Piet Slaghekke
Thanks everyone for your responses.I do not have any filtering configured. Also I have followed all the optimizations in the documentation.When I have a users with a new mailbox everything loads very fast, it seems to only occur with users who have many folders and large inboxes.<-

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Karl Pearson
On Thu, June 11, 2009 2:19 pm, Randal T. Rioux wrote: > On Thu, June 11, 2009 3:51 pm, i...@braha.nl wrote: >>> Thanks William, >>> >>> Ok here are some more details: >>> >>> Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is >>> set to True. >>> >> I run the same software on a

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-11 Thread Juan Hernandez
ehh are we going to keep this threat alive by answering to all this pointless BS? On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Karl Pearson wrote: > > On Thu, June 11, 2009 5:13 am, Nieuwslezer wrote: > > You wrote: > > > >> > >> On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> >

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Randal T. Rioux
On Thu, June 11, 2009 3:51 pm, i...@braha.nl wrote: >> Thanks William, >> >> Ok here are some more details: >> >> Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is >> set to True. >> > I run the same software on a 7 year old P4 machine, and have boxes of > 8000+ mails. Never had

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread info
> Thanks William, > > Ok here are some more details: > > Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is > set to True. > I run the same software on a 7 year old P4 machine, and have boxes of 8000+ mails. Never had this trouble. Maybe you read up on optimizing the speed, ther

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Piet Slaghekke
Thanks William, Ok here are some more details: Courier-imap; Postfix; using MaildirsAllow sever-side sorting is set to True. hope that helps. Wm Mussatto wrote: On Thu, June 11, 2009 08:47, Piet Slaghekke wrote: Hello everyone, I am sure more people have had issues with this a

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-11 Thread Karl Pearson
On Thu, June 11, 2009 5:13 am, Nieuwslezer wrote: > You wrote: > >> >> On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > je...@u-impression.com --> SquirrelMail-users (2009-06-09 15:40:25 >> > +0800): >> > > I must say that this email really sucks. >> > >> > indeed, your emai

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Wm Mussatto
On Thu, June 11, 2009 08:47, Piet Slaghekke wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your > solutions could be shared with me. > > I am using SM version: 1.4.10a > > If a user as an inbox of more than 2000 messages it may take SM 1 + > minutes

[SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail issues with large inboxes

2009-06-11 Thread Piet Slaghekke
Hello everyone, I am sure more people have had issues with this and perhaps some of your solutions could be shared with me. I am using SM version: 1.4.10a If a user as an inbox of more than 2000 messages it may take SM 1 + minutes to load. Sometimes it will give the folloing error message:

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-11 Thread Marc Powell
On Jun 11, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Nieuwslezer wrote: > You wrote: > >> >> On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: >> I LOVE SQUIRRELMAIL I have a product that's free, that I can >> share >> with my users, also for FREE, and customize to behave like just >> about any >> email client

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-11 Thread Nieuwslezer
You wrote: > > On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: > > Hello, > > > > je...@u-impression.com --> SquirrelMail-users (2009-06-09 15:40:25 > > +0800): > > > I must say that this email really sucks. > > > > indeed, your email sucks. But why did you write it then? > > Yes! Someone who

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-10 Thread Res
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Fredrik Jervfors wrote: > Hi Jenny. > >> I must say that this email really sucks. It's the worst I've ever >> experienced. > > I assume that you're referring to the mail system as a whole, for which > the SquirrelMail Project isn't responsible. > >> (1) When the English interf

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-10 Thread Karl Pearson
On Wed, June 10, 2009 1:28 pm, Jukka Salmi wrote: > Hello, > > je...@u-impression.com --> SquirrelMail-users (2009-06-09 15:40:25 > +0800): >> I must say that this email really sucks. > > indeed, your email sucks. But why did you write it then? Yes! Someone who figured out what she really meant!

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-10 Thread Jukka Salmi
Hello, je...@u-impression.com --> SquirrelMail-users (2009-06-09 15:40:25 +0800): > I must say that this email really sucks. indeed, your email sucks. But why did you write it then? Regards, Jukka -- This email fills a much-needed gap in the archives. ---

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-10 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
>> I must say that this email really sucks. It's the worst I've ever >> experienced. > > I assume that you're referring to the mail system as a whole, for which > the SquirrelMail Project isn't responsible. > >> (1) When the English interface is selected, Chinese doesn't show > > This is not a bug

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-10 Thread Fredrik Jervfors
Hi Jenny. > I must say that this email really sucks. It's the worst I've ever > experienced. I assume that you're referring to the mail system as a whole, for which the SquirrelMail Project isn't responsible. > (1) When the English interface is selected, Chinese doesn't show This is not a bug i

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-10 Thread Juan Hernandez
Dude... as follows I must say that this email really sucks. > It's the worst I've ever experienced. There are plenty of choices available. It's up to you to choose them. It's free software in a free world > > > (1) When the English interface is selected, Chinese doesn't show Check your instal

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* je...@u-impression.com : > Dear SquirrelMail, > > I must say that this email really sucks. > It's the worst I've ever experienced. > > (1) When the English interface is selected, Chinese doesn't show Chinese WHAT doesn't show? > (2) What's up with the attachment limitation of 2 MB? Free mail

[SM-USERS] squirrel mail sucks

2009-06-10 Thread jenny
Dear SquirrelMail, I must say that this email really sucks. It's the worst I've ever experienced. (1) When the English interface is selected, Chinese doesn't show (2) What's up with the attachment limitation of 2 MB? Free mail already gives more than 2 GB! (3) How come there's no option to be abl

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail slow

2008-12-13 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Hungry Snail wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > My mail server has been running fine for the lasy 8 months, however I had to > hard reset it the other day. > > Since then Squirrelmail has been really slow to respond, 90% of the time it > takes up to 10 seconds for a request

[SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail slow

2008-12-13 Thread Hungry Snail
Hi Guys, My mail server has been running fine for the lasy 8 months, however I had to hard reset it the other day. Since then Squirrelmail has been really slow to respond, 90% of the time it takes up to 10 seconds for a request to take effect, or even for the login screen to come up, the other 1

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail slow

2008-12-12 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Hungry Snail wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > My mail server has been running fine for the lasy 8 months, however I had > to hard reset it the other day. > > Since then Squirrelmail has been really slow to respond, 90% of the time > it takes up to 10 seconds for a request to take effect, or even for t

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail Update Procedure: Macintosh

2008-07-01 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Gary and Diane Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > I use Squirrel Mail through my cable TV/internet service provider, > Chibardun TelCom located in Cameron, WI. I've found it to be very > user-friendly and stable on my Mac G4 running Mac OS 10.4. > > As

[SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail Update Procedure: Macintosh

2008-07-01 Thread Gary and Diane Peterson
Hi guys, I use Squirrel Mail through my cable TV/internet service provider, Chibardun TelCom located in Cameron, WI. I've found it to be very user-friendly and stable on my Mac G4 running Mac OS 10.4. As the version I run, offered by Chibardun, doesn't seem to allow creating email address groups,

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail not accepting pw

2008-03-19 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:08 PM, colb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have created a pop mail account in Thunderbird for my two squirrel mail This is very unclear. Accounts are created on the mail server, NOT in any one mail client (Thunderbird is a client, SquirrelMail is another client). >

[SM-USERS] Squirrel mail not accepting pw

2008-03-19 Thread colb
I have created a pop mail account in Thunderbird for my two squirrel mail accounts one opens alright, on the second one I can send an email but when trying to retrieve mail it asks for password. After putting this in it is refused by my web mail, however if I open the web mail in a browser my pas

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail help!

2008-01-31 Thread Oguzhan Kayhan
> Hi, > > I have a one.com account and I want to put squirrel mail onto my site. > > How do I link it to my site? Do I need to configure my php and mysql? > > > Thanks > > Tom > Hello, As i read the one.com account page, it has support for both php and mysql. It is not necessary to use mysql with s

[SM-USERS] Squirrel mail help!

2008-01-31 Thread Thomas Bezants
Hi, I have a one.com account and I want to put squirrel mail onto my site. How do I link it to my site? Do I need to configure my php and mysql? Thanks Tom - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenge

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.4.11

2007-10-07 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Gerry Lieberwirth wrote: > > I have installed it and Squirrel Mail wise, all seems to be fine. > > I have only one little problem I can’t figure out, maybe someone out there > can shed a light on this. > > I can access all folders of a users account EXCEPT the system folders. > > When I look

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.4.11

2007-10-05 Thread Paul Lesniewski
> > Hey guys, this stuff is cool!! > > I have installed it and Squirrel Mail wise, all seems to be fine. > > I have only one little problem I can't figure out, maybe someone out there > can shed a light on this. > > I can access all folders of a users account EXCEPT the system folders. > > When I l

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.4.11

2007-10-05 Thread Paul Lesniewski
> Hey guys, this stuff is cool!! Glad you like it, thank you. > I have installed it and Squirrel Mail wise, all seems to be fine. > > I have only one little problem I can't figure out, maybe someone out there > can shed a light on this. > > I can access all folders of a users account EXCEPT the s

[SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.4.11

2007-10-04 Thread gerry
Hey guys, this stuff is cool!! I have installed it and Squirrel Mail wise, all seems to be fine. I have only one little problem I can't figure out, maybe someone out there can shed a light on this. I can access all folders of a users account EXCEPT the system folders. When I look into the em

[SM-USERS] Squirrel Mail 1.4.11

2007-10-04 Thread Gerry Lieberwirth
Hey guys, this stuff is cool!! I have installed it and Squirrel Mail wise, all seems to be fine. I have only one little problem I can’t figure out, maybe someone out there can shed a light on this. I can access all folders of a users account EXCEPT the system folders. When I look into the em

[SM-USERS] Squirrel mail + imapd in solaris 9

2007-07-11 Thread Mrs Geetha Thanu
Hello Gurus, i am facing problem for past few weeks.. when the user login in to squirrel mail it takes lot of time to fetch the mails and even many time sit says IMAPD connection is lost.. I feel the problem is with the IMAPD daemon running in solaris..is anybody having any such experience..how

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail + imapd in solaris 9

2007-07-10 Thread Rainer Sokoll
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 06:46:13AM +0100, revathi ganesh wrote: > Hello Gurus, > i am facing problem for past few weeks.. > > when the user login in to squirrel mail it takes lot > of time to fetch the > mails and even many time sit says IMAPD connection is > lost.. > > I feel the problem is with

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail + imapd in solaris 9

2007-07-10 Thread Alexandros G. Fragkiadakis
On Tue, July 10, 2007 08:46, revathi ganesh wrote: > Hello Gurus, > i am facing problem for past few weeks.. > > when the user login in to squirrel mail it takes lot of time to fetch the > mails and even many time sit says IMAPD connection is lost.. > > I feel the problem is with the IMAPD daemon r

[SM-USERS] Squirrel mail + imapd in solaris 9

2007-07-09 Thread revathi ganesh
Hello Gurus, i am facing problem for past few weeks.. when the user login in to squirrel mail it takes lot of time to fetch the mails and even many time sit says IMAPD connection is lost.. I feel the problem is with the IMAPD daemon running in solaris..is anybody having any such experience..how c

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail php errors

2007-02-27 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 2/27/07, Paul Santiago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I am trying to install a new mail server, it's not online yet. > >> When I test it to send mail from the web browser I get this error: > > >> ERROR: Could not append message to Sent Messages. > >> Server responded: System I/O error This see

[SM-USERS] squirrel mail php errors

2007-02-27 Thread Paul Santiago
>> I am trying to install a new mail server, it's not online yet. >> When I test it to send mail from the web browser I get this error: >> ERROR: Could not append message to Sent Messages. >> Server responded: System I/O error >> >> Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrel mail is deleting my messages

2007-02-04 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 1/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I hope someone can help me with this. I've had squirrel mail for my private > web site for over 2 years w/out a problem. But now in the past month there > have been 3 occasions when I've logged in and found that squirrel mail has > dele

[SM-USERS] squirrel mail is deleting my messages

2007-02-01 Thread Gregory1274
I hope someone can help me with this. I've had squirrel mail for my private web site for over 2 years w/out a problem. But now in the past month there have been 3 occasions when I've logged in and found that squirrel mail has deleted all unopened email from my inbox (which was nowhere near th

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail email and password

2007-01-21 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Oracle, On Saturday, January 20, 2007, Oracle wrote: > Who do i get a squirrelmail webmail user name and login please i will need > your help urgently please > Do i have to install a squirrelmail and if i have to how do i go about it SquirrelMail

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail email and password

2007-01-21 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, On Saturday, January 20, 2007, Paul wrote: > On 1/19/07, Fredrik Jervfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> How do I enable squirrel mail to remember my email and password when >> >> loging in. >> > >> > This is a function of your browser, not

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrel mail email and password

2007-01-20 Thread Oracle Ayos
Who do i get a squirrelmail webmail user name and login please i will need your help urgently please Do i have to install a squirrelmail and if i have to how do i go about it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of

  1   2   >