Re: [SM-USERS] SSL Squirrelmail through Reverse Proxy (Pound)

2007-07-02 Thread Daniel Watts
Daniel Watts wrote: > Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> On 6/28/07, Daniel W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Paul Lesniewski wrote: On 6/28/07, Daniel Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear List, > > Has anyone got a setup where you have a Pound front end reverse-proxy > listening for

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL Squirrelmail through Reverse Proxy (Pound)

2007-06-29 Thread Daniel Watts
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On 6/28/07, Daniel W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Paul Lesniewski wrote: >>> On 6/28/07, Daniel Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear List, Has anyone got a setup where you have a Pound front end reverse-proxy listening for HTTPS traffic, and redirectin

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL Squirrelmail through Reverse Proxy (Pound)

2007-06-28 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 6/28/07, Daniel W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > On 6/28/07, Daniel Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Dear List, > >> > >> Has anyone got a setup where you have a Pound front end reverse-proxy > >> listening for HTTPS traffic, and redirecting via HTTP to a batch of >

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL Squirrelmail through Reverse Proxy (Pound)

2007-06-28 Thread Daniel W
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On 6/28/07, Daniel Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dear List, >> >> Has anyone got a setup where you have a Pound front end reverse-proxy >> listening for HTTPS traffic, and redirecting via HTTP to a batch of >> backend web servers that squirrelmail is installed on? >>

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL Squirrelmail through Reverse Proxy (Pound)

2007-06-28 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On 6/28/07, Daniel Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear List, > > Has anyone got a setup where you have a Pound front end reverse-proxy > listening for HTTPS traffic, and redirecting via HTTP to a batch of > backend web servers that squirrelmail is installed on? > > I have this working nicely ex

[SM-USERS] SSL Squirrelmail through Reverse Proxy (Pound)

2007-06-28 Thread Daniel Watts
Dear List, Has anyone got a setup where you have a Pound front end reverse-proxy listening for HTTPS traffic, and redirecting via HTTP to a batch of backend web servers that squirrelmail is installed on? I have this working nicely except that the links and redirects are all then written as "ht

[SM-USERS] SSL & Windows mail-sending bug in 1.44

2005-07-13 Thread J D Perkins
I'm having users unable to send mail on certain platforms. They click the send button, then get a Windows error page. I've confirmed this behaviour with IE and Firefox on XP SP2. Oddly, Safari is immune, and after some effort, I've got Netscape on Irix to work - but more on that later. Setup:

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL/TLS for SMTP

2005-04-04 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Per, On Monday, April 04, 2005, Per olof Ljungmark wrote... > Hi all, > If I enable TLS for SMTP I see the error below. I have SSL extensions > for PHP but apparently this does not work, do I have to build PHP with > static OpenSSL? Suggestions welcome. > php4-4.3.10_2 on FreeBSD 5.3, apac

[SM-USERS] SSL/TLS for SMTP

2005-04-04 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Hi all, If I enable TLS for SMTP I see the error below. I have SSL extensions for PHP but apparently this does not work, do I have to build PHP with static OpenSSL? Suggestions welcome. php4-4.3.10_2 on FreeBSD 5.3, apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22, SM 1.4.4 PHP Warning: fsockopen(): no SSL support

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL Problem

2005-03-01 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
> Hello > > I have SquirrelMail installed in a SharedHosting Environment. To use SSL I > have to change the URL http://www.domain.tld to > https://sslsites.tld/domain.tld. > > After that some links in SquirrelMail work correct, for example the links > in > the left frame. But some do not because th

[SM-USERS] SSL Problem

2005-02-23 Thread Karsten Docht
Hello I have SquirrelMail installed in a SharedHosting Environment. To use SSL I have to change the URL http://www.domain.tld to https://sslsites.tld/domain.tld. After that some links in SquirrelMail work correct, for example the links in the left frame. But some do not because the "domain.tld" p

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL

2004-05-07 Thread p dont think
Dears,If i want to use imap over SSL,How do it? PLEASE read the documentation before posting such questions. That's what it's there for. A great deal of effort was put into creating it, and now you're just asking for us to duplicate that effort because...? If you want SM->IMAP TLS-secured con

[SM-USERS] SSL

2004-05-07 Thread Pahlevanzadeh Mohsen
Dears,If i want to use imap over SSL,How do it? Yours,Mohsen. = -DIGITAL SIGNATURE--- ///Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh Network administrator & programmer My work phone is : +98216054096-7 My home phone is: +98213810146 My emails i

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL configuration questons

2004-03-05 Thread robbin
I'm running multiple virtual servers on my home network and all have access to my squirrelmail. The following is my httpd.conf with the rewrite and redirect information. DocumentRoot /my path../squirrelmail RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^/webmail https://%{SERVER_NAME}/webmail [R]

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL configuration questons

2004-03-05 Thread Galen Johnson
this should be easy...just configure the NameVirtualHost directive within your httpd.conf file. Then set up a virtual host. Then just redirect to the https://webmail...I use this method...of course I also use the Redirect directive within httpd.conf to accomplish the redirect to https. There

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL configuration questons

2004-03-05 Thread Mike Campbell
Good idea but it didn't work as expected. For some reason it got into an infinite loop and the apache logs showed the error: 192.168.1.102 - - [05/Mar/2004:07:42:06 -0600] "GET /webmailwebmailwebmailwebmai lwebmailwebmailwebmailwebmailwebmailwebmailwebmailwebmailwebmailwebmailwebmailwe bmailwe

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL configuration questons

2004-03-04 Thread p dont think
> In fact, the simplest method i've found to do this: (B> (B> Put an "index.php" in your http://www.ec.org/webmail with the following: (B> (B> header("Location: (B> https://www.ec.org/webmail/src/login.php?secure_login=yes"); (B> ?> (B> (B> This will cause the user's browser to immediately

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL configuration questons

2004-03-04 Thread Stewart MacLund
Hey Mike. In fact, the simplest method i've found to do this: Put an "index.php" in your http://www.ec.org/webmail with the following: https://www.ec.org/webmail/src/login.php?secure_login=yes";); ?> This will cause the user's browser to immediately jump to the specified location. HTH... SUn

[SM-USERS] SSL configuration questons

2004-03-04 Thread Mike Campbell
I have successfully installed SM 1.4.2-1 on a fedora core 1 machine and have it working. Now I would like to setup SM so that all access is via https for security. I downloaded the secure-login plugin and installed it and now when I access SM it does so via https. Currently I need to access SM

[SM-USERS] SSL Error

2003-12-16 Thread Norman Zhang
Hi, When I tried to login to SquirrelMail, I recieved the following error message on my browser. I only enable imaps (port 993) for connection, and I did enabled the settings in config.php A. Update IMAP Settings : localhost:993 (cyrus) B. Change Sendmail Config : /usr/sbin/sendmail Would s

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL Problem

2003-01-14 Thread Mike Morrell
MAIL PROTECTED] > > - Original Message - > From: "Alan J. Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:14 AM > Subject: [SM-USERS] SSL Problem > > > We are getting complaints from a minority of our user

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL Problem

2003-01-14 Thread David Chait
air Siding Road #107 Stanford CA, 94305 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Alan J. Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:14 AM Subject: [SM-USERS] SSL Problem We are getting complaints from a minority of our

[SM-USERS] SSL Problem

2003-01-14 Thread Alan J. Cooper
We are getting complaints from a minority of our users complaining that when they login in to to squirrelmail, they get erratic error messages pertaining to.. ´This page contains secure and non secure items - continue yes /no" clicking either means that the user get locks out. this can happen

RE: [SM-USERS] SSL Login

2002-12-29 Thread Harold Hallikainen
Well, Red Hat Network just updated SM from 1.2.7 to 1.2.8, and now secure_login properly returns to http after the login page! THANKS! Harold --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf -

RE: [SM-USERS] SSL Login

2002-12-27 Thread p dont think
to go back to http after login it does not? > -Original Message- > From: Harold Hallikainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 6:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SM-USERS] SSL Login > > > Are you using the Secu

RE: [SM-USERS] SSL Login

2002-12-27 Thread p dont think
ay, December 26, 2002 11:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SM-USERS] SSL Login > > I'm running SM1.27 (the latest update from Red Hat Network) with SSL > login. An attempt at http login correctly redirects to https, but after > the login page, we stay at https in

[SM-USERS] SSL Login

2002-12-26 Thread Harold Hallikainen
I'm running SM1.27 (the latest update from Red Hat Network) with SSL login. An attempt at http login correctly redirects to https, but after the login page, we stay at https instead of going back to http. It was my understanding that it is supposed to switch back to http. Is this something fixed i

RE: [SM-USERS] ssl needed?

2002-12-05 Thread Peter Hutnick
Mike Loiterman said: >> > Also -- I tried enabling SMTP Authentication but that didn't work >> either. >> >> In what way? It failed authentication? What authentication method? > > When I say that it didn't work, I mean that it allowed me to send the > mail without requesting a password. Either

RE: [SM-USERS] ssl needed?

2002-12-05 Thread Mike Loiterman
> -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Angliss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:37 AM > To: Mike Loiterman > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] ssl needed? > > Hello Mike, > On Thursday, December 05, 2002, Mike Loite

Re: [SM-USERS] ssl needed?

2002-12-05 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Mike, On Thursday, December 05, 2002, Mike Loiterman wrote... > I just wrapped my pop connections in an ssl tunnel and I'm wondering > if I need or if I can do the same to my squirrel mail connections. > Aside from SquirrelMail, I do not use IMAP. I have those ports (143) > closed on my fire

Re: [SM-USERS] ssl needed?

2002-12-05 Thread Peter Hutnick
Mike Loiterman said: > I just wrapped my pop connections in an ssl tunnel and I'm wondering if > I need or if I can do the same to my squirrel mail connections. Aside > from SquirrelMail, I do not use IMAP. I have those ports (143) closed > on my firewall. My web server and my IMAP server are on

Re: [SM-USERS] ssl needed?

2002-12-05 Thread Chris Hilts
> > "If your mail server is the same as your web server, there is no need > for the encrypted communication. It's useless. Just toss it out the > window, if you can." > > I don't understand what this means. Isn't the password used to access > SquirrelMail sent in cleartext? Why wouldn't I use the

[SM-USERS] ssl needed?

2002-12-04 Thread Mike Loiterman
I just wrapped my pop connections in an ssl tunnel and I'm wondering if I need or if I can do the same to my squirrel mail connections. Aside from SquirrelMail, I do not use IMAP. I have those ports (143) closed on my firewall. My web server and my IMAP server are on the same machine and accordi

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL problem

2002-12-02 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Dimitrios Stergiou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Why use two trees in the first place? > Actually all i want is the ssl tree. when i saw that i have certain problems, > i also installed under a non-ssl tree to make a test. Okay, so you can't forward messages while using SSL, do you get any er

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL problem

2002-12-02 Thread Dimitrios Stergiou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 02 December 2002 02:01 pm, Sander Smeenk wrote: > Why use two trees in the first place? > I host SM on my machine and have an SSL server pointing to the same tree > as the non-SSL server. Recently I decided not to allow non-SSL access, > so

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL problem

2002-12-02 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Dimitrios Stergiou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > i have installed squirel mail 1.2.9 and i face the following problem > i have installed it under 2 identical trees, one for ssl and one for non-ssl > access > when i use the non-ssl tree, everything works fine > when i use the ssl tree, i can't fo

RE: [SM-USERS] SSL problem

2002-11-28 Thread p dont think
... > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Dimitrios Stergiou > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SM-USERS] SSL problem > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Has

[SM-USERS] SSL problem

2002-11-28 Thread Dimitrios Stergiou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there i have installed squirel mail 1.2.9 and i face the following problem i have installed it under 2 identical trees, one for ssl and one for non-ssl access when i use the non-ssl tree, everything works fine when i use the ssl tree, i can't fo

RE: [SM-USERS] SSL with just login.php page

2002-11-19 Thread p dont think
> > In setup.php, make sure $change_back_to_http_after_login = 1; > > I think that might be the default, but I forget... > > Now, should I keep the login.php file in a folder by itself? How would I > setup ssl for just one file? No, just make sure in your apache configuration that the base direct

RE: [SM-USERS] SSL with just login.php page

2002-11-15 Thread Jody Cleveland
Hi Harold, Thank you so much for writing me back! > Here are a few comments on SSL on RH8.0. > In the version of Apache shipped with RH8.0, the SSL > configuration > got moved to its own file : /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf . The root of > the SSL directory tree is defined in there with a

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL with just login.php page

2002-11-13 Thread pdontthink
> Because of this alias, http://192.168.1.8/webmail/ or > https://192.168.1.8/webmail/ will bring up the login page. I'm > working on getting this to be ONLY accessable by https, but have not > done that yet. On my RH7.3 machine, I put squirel mail in the ssl > document tree so that was the on

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL with just login.php page

2002-11-13 Thread Harold Hallikainen
Here are a few comments on SSL on RH8.0. In the version of Apache shipped with RH8.0, the SSL configuration got moved to its own file : /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf . The root of the SSL directory tree is defined in there with a statement like: ## ## SSL Virtual Host Context ## # # Gene

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL with just login.php page

2002-11-13 Thread Galen Johnson
Jody Cleveland wrote: Hello, You enable SSL in your webserver; add the SM includes to it (I'm using Apache as a sample here). Now, when you access the SM webpage, you do so using "https", not "http". That's the part I'm confused on. What do I do to get that page to use ssl? You men

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL with just login.php page

2002-11-13 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Jody, On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, Jody Cleveland wrote... > Hello, >> You enable SSL in your webserver; add the SM includes to it (I'm >> using Apache as a sample here). Now, when you access the SM >> webpage, you do so using "https", not "http". > That's the part I'm confused on. Wha

RE: [SM-USERS] SSL with just login.php page

2002-11-13 Thread Jody Cleveland
Hello, > You enable SSL in your webserver; add the SM includes to it (I'm using > Apache as a sample here). Now, when you access the SM > webpage, you do so > using "https", not "http". That's the part I'm confused on. What do I do to get that page to use ssl? > You mention no specs of your sys

Re: [SM-USERS] SSL with just login.php page

2002-11-13 Thread Michael Leone
Jody Cleveland said: > Hello, > > I feel so lost. I've got a redhat 8 box running squirrelmail. What I > want now, is to have the login.php file to be encrypted. I've read up on > it, and was able to create a SSL key, and certificate. Now, I want to > apply it to the page, which is where I get con

[SM-USERS] SSL with just login.php page

2002-11-13 Thread Jody Cleveland
Hello, I feel so lost. I've got a redhat 8 box running squirrelmail. What I want now, is to have the login.php file to be encrypted. I've read up on it, and was able to create a SSL key, and certificate. Now, I want to apply it to the page, which is where I get confused. What do I do at this point