On Wednesday 21 October 2009 04:34:28 pm David C. Rankin wrote:
> Sorry, I completely missed that part. Do you want me to repost my reply in
> that thread?
>
Disregard, I see you took care of it
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 759
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 01:21:53 am Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
> David C. Rankin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 02:55:27 pm Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> >
> >
> >> It's been reported that 1.5.2 does this when using PHP 5.3. I have no
> >> idea what versions the OP was using, but this is likely
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 02:40:58 pm Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> I asked you to respond on the more appropriate thread. Please do that
> next time. I will reply there.
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:53 PM, David C. Rankin
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 02:55:27 pm Paul Lesniewski wr
I asked you to respond on the more appropriate thread. Please do that
next time. I will reply there.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:53 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 October 2009 02:55:27 pm Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
>>
>> It's been reported that 1.5.2 does this when using PHP 5.3. I ha
David C. Rankin wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 20 October 2009 02:55:27 pm Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
>>
>> It's been reported that 1.5.2 does this when using PHP 5.3. I have no
>> idea what versions the OP was using, but this is likely your problem.
>> I haven't had the time to test this, but you shoul
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 02:55:27 pm Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
> It's been reported that 1.5.2 does this when using PHP 5.3. I have no
> idea what versions the OP was using, but this is likely your problem.
> I haven't had the time to test this, but you should first make sure
> you are getting
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
>> On Monday 12 October 2009 11:56:33 am Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
>>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> I just found this thread. After yesterdays updates to 1.5.2 svn (Rev
>> 13866), I have the ex
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> On Monday 12 October 2009 11:56:33 am Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
>
> Thomas,
>
> I just found this thread. After yesterdays updates to 1.5.2 svn (Rev
> 13866), I have the exact same problem, but unfortunately, plugins are not my
> problem. I
On Monday 12 October 2009 11:56:33 am Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
Thomas,
I just found this thread. After yesterdays updates to 1.5.2 svn (Rev
13866), I have the exact same problem, but unfortunately, plugins are not my
problem. I have used squirrel mail for years, and aside from a few issues in
> Find out why login is redirected to http:// URL. SquirrelMail login form
> sends data to src/redirect.php, redirect.php sets authentication cookies
> and
> redirects users to src/webmail.php, webmail.php creates frameset with
> left_main.php and right_main.php frames. All scripts use same base UR
Chris Riley wrote:
>
> Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Tomas Kuliavas <
> to...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> > Base URL detected as: https://.com/squirrelmail/src
>> > (location base autodetected)
>>
>> 1. Is base URL detected correc
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Tomas Kuliavas <
to...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> > Base URL detected as: https://.com/squirrelmail/src
> > (location base autodetected)
>
> 1. Is base URL detected correctly? It must match URL displayed in
>
Hello,
I recently rebuilt my linux box, and now I'm having trouble with logging on
to squirrelmail. None of my users can log into SM. It always says "you must
be logged in to access this page". Users can get their mail via an IMAP
client such as Thunderbird, but the website fails every time.
I am
13 matches
Mail list logo
