On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:47:16 +0100
Pierre Ossman wrote:
>
> Conclusion:
>
> Based on this, I'm guessing that SM doesn't honour the
> content-transfer-encoding and just feeds the attachment as-is to the
> rfc822 parser.
>
Ok, I'm going to have to back pedal on this. I just found this in
rfc204
Disclaimer: This is speculation on my part based on observed
behaviour. I haven't checked the code.
I'm having problems with SM not being able to read some forwarded mail.
I've narrowed it down to it fudging things up whenever the
Content-Transfer-Encoding needs to be respected.
System info:
Squ
