[SM-USERS] Re: mailto link

2003-11-03 Thread Seth Randall
Yeah, that's what mailto does. Passes it to login.php if you aren't logged in. Otherwise it passes to compose. As for the logins, that's why I had it set that way originally. I wasn't detecting the login because someone might have left a browser open and walked away. Also, if SquirrelMail ever

[SM-USERS] Re: mailto link

2003-11-03 Thread SM-Development
Hi Seth, The code works! However, the URL on the browser is re-written with the long line link from mailto. I guess that's because the "header('Location: ' . $redirect);" that replaces the content of the URL in the browser. On the other note, can I get user to login to only one instance of t

[SM-USERS] Re: mailto link

2003-11-03 Thread SM-Development
Hi Seth, I've changed the "$redirect = 'login.php?mailto=' . $url;" to "$redirect .= $url;". However, I get the 403 Forbidden page: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /src/send_to=orawf%40pansar.com.my&body=Approval+Action%3A+%27Approve%27%0D% 0A%0D%0AIf+forwarding+this+document+to

[SM-USERS] Re: mailto link

2003-11-03 Thread SM-Development
Hi Seth, I've tried, these are some findings and questions: Findings: When I clicked on the mailto hyperlink, the current (self) broswer window will ask me to (re)login. I login and go straight to the compose window with all the preset message! Good Questions: 1. How do I get the link to

[SM-USERS] Re: mailto link

2003-11-02 Thread Seth Randall
Yeah, I sent you some files around the 9 of October to try out. I'll send them to you again. Seth. SM-Development said: > Hi Seth, > > > Thanks for taking up this task. Any progress so far? > > > I'm yet to check the latest 1.4.2 > > > Mine is still on 1.4.1 > > > Regards. > > > Seth Randall writ

[SM-USERS] Re: mailto link

2003-11-02 Thread SM-Development
Hi Seth, Thanks for taking up this task. Any progress so far? I'm yet to check the latest 1.4.2 Mine is still on 1.4.1 Regards. Seth Randall writes: I'll take a look at it today and see if I can get it working for both 1.4.x and 1.5.x. Seth. SM-Development said: Is the 1.4.x branch wil