Hello Sm-development,
On Monday, February 10, 2003, SM-Development wrote...
> Hi,
> If you click on the download link or on the filename of the JPG, it'll ask
> you to download the file. I guess the VIEW link was not included.
Not sure what settings you have over there, but it seems to to wor
Hi,
If you click on the download link or on the filename of the JPG, it'll ask
you to download the file. I guess the VIEW link was not included.
Jonathan Angliss writes:
Hello Sm-development,
On Monday, February 10, 2003, SM-Development wrote...
I think the "view" link was removed... tr
Hello Sm-development,
On Monday, February 10, 2003, SM-Development wrote...
> Speaking of base64 encoding of JPEG file, I found that in SQM-1.2.7,
> when I view the same email with inline jpg attachment, the picture
> shows OK.
> If I just send the JPG as attachment, the VIEW link (as well as
> D
Hi Jon and Rob,
Speaking of base64 encoding of JPEG file, I found that in SQM-1.2.7, when I
view the same email with inline jpg attachment, the picture shows OK.
If I just send the JPG as attachment, the VIEW link (as well as DOWNLOAD)
will appear. In 1.4.0.RC2a, this is not happening - just
> Hello Rob,
> On Sunday, February 09, 2003, Rob Prince wrote...
>
>> Excuse my newbieness (it is rather ripe!), but what is the format of
>> the attached ascii text in the message below, and how would I turn it
>> back into a .jpg?
>
>> Is this uuencode, and should I get that plugin? I haven't see
Hello Rob,
On Sunday, February 09, 2003, Rob Prince wrote...
> Excuse my newbieness (it is rather ripe!), but what is the format of the
> attached ascii text in the message below, and how would I turn it back
> into a .jpg?
> Is this uuencode, and should I get that plugin? I haven't seen uuencode
