Re: [SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] Asearch on Mercury/32

2003-07-25 Thread Keith Hatfull
> I get the following when I go to the Folder Options over and over > (number of repetitions equals the number of folders I have): > > Warning: substr_count() [function.substr-count]: Empty substring. in > c:\wwwroot\hatfull\squirrelmail.devel\functions\imap_mailbox.php on line > 391 > > Warning: s

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] Asearch on Mercury/32

2003-07-25 Thread keith
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> Just read this on squirrelmail-users: >> >> "Keith Hatfull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Now, if the search function in 1.4.1 only worked with Mercury/32 (I'm >>> on >>> 1.2.11) I'd be a *real* happy camper. If any of the devleopers would >>> like >>> to try to tackl

[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] Asearch on Mercury/32

2003-07-25 Thread Alex Lemaresquier
> As a side note, the search function in 1.2.11 works flawlessly with > Merc/32, at least in my environment it does. Interesting. It should be pretty much the same as in 1.4.1. Of course, other parts of sm have changed a lot since. > I'd be happy to test 1.5.1 but I don't have a box with CVS insta

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] Asearch on Mercury/32

2003-07-25 Thread Keith Hatfull
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> Just read this on squirrelmail-users: >> >> "Keith Hatfull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Now, if the search function in 1.4.1 only worked with Mercury/32 (I'm >>> on 1.2.11) I'd be a *real* happy camper. If any of the devleopers >>> would like >>> to try to tackle t

[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] Asearch on Mercury/32

2003-07-25 Thread Alex Lemaresquier
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Just read this on squirrelmail-users: > > "Keith Hatfull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Now, if the search function in 1.4.1 only worked with Mercury/32 (I'm on >> 1.2.11) I'd be a *real* happy camper. If any of the devleopers would >> like >> to try to tackle that one I'