Re: [SM-USERS] Performance on huge mail folders

2004-11-13 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Fran, On Wednesday, November 10, 2004, Fran Fabrizio wrote... > I have SM running on the same host as my Courier-IMAP install and I > have also installed imapproxy, enabled server side sorting and > server side threading. All of these things did help - I went from > not being able to pull u

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance on huge mail folders

2004-11-12 Thread Fran Fabrizio
another thing to consider is that if you were just accessing the maildir for the first time, your imap server has to build its internal cache (courier does this, I know). Try accessing the folder with another imap client first, and then see how it fares with squirrelmail. I have zero issues w

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance on huge mail folders

2004-11-12 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 12 November 2004 06:05 am, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > > Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > >>I think bottleneck is in your filesystem. Compare directory access times > >>on different filesystems. Find the one that can access directories with > >>many small files faster. > > > > This evening I set up a

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance on huge mail folders

2004-11-12 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > >> >>I think bottleneck is in your filesystem. Compare directory access times >>on different filesystems. Find the one that can access directories with >>many small files faster. >> >> > This evening I set up a test. I used the same Maildir ~850MB in size > with 27k mess

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance on huge mail folders

2004-11-11 Thread Fran Fabrizio
Tomas Kuliavas wrote: I think bottleneck is in your filesystem. Compare directory access times on different filesystems. Find the one that can access directories with many small files faster. This evening I set up a test. I used the same Maildir ~850MB in size with 27k messages in my INBOX in

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance on huge mail folders

2004-11-11 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> I have SM running on the same host as my Courier-IMAP install and I have > also installed imapproxy, enabled server side sorting and server side > threading. All of these things did help - I went from not being able to > pull up a folder with 27k messages in it to being able to bring it up in >

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance on huge mail folders

2004-11-10 Thread p dont think
I have SM running on the same host as my Courier-IMAP install and I have also installed imapproxy, enabled server side sorting and server side threading. All of these things did help - I went from not being able to pull up a folder with 27k messages in it to being able to bring it up in around

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance on huge mail folders

2004-11-10 Thread Ean Kingston
p dont think wrote: I have SM running on the same host as my Courier-IMAP install and I have also installed imapproxy, enabled server side sorting and server side threading. All of these things did help - I went from not being able to pull up a folder with 27k messages in it to being able to

Re: [SM-USERS] Performance on huge mail folders

2004-11-10 Thread p dont think
I have SM running on the same host as my Courier-IMAP install and I have also installed imapproxy, enabled server side sorting and server side threading. All of these things did help - I went from not being able to pull up a folder with 27k messages in it to being able to bring it up in aroun

[SM-USERS] Performance on huge mail folders

2004-11-10 Thread Fran Fabrizio
I have SM running on the same host as my Courier-IMAP install and I have also installed imapproxy, enabled server side sorting and server side threading. All of these things did help - I went from not being able to pull up a folder with 27k messages in it to being able to bring it up in around