Re: [SM-USERS] New Squirrelmail RPM and Shared Calendar Plugin

2005-04-02 Thread Mike Klinke
On Friday 01 April 2005 16:24, William Hooper wrote: > It makes perfect sense.  The calendar folder is part of the RPM, > so it added and replaced files as needed.  Since the calendar > directory is part of the Squirrelmail "program", these files have > to be replaced. Yes, as Paul mentioned, he

Re: [SM-USERS] New Squirrelmail RPM and Shared Calendar Plugin

2005-04-02 Thread William Hooper
Mike Klinke said: > On Thursday 31 March 2005 16:11, William Hooper wrote: > > >> Looking at the .spec file >> (http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/squirrelmail/FC-3/squi >> rrelmail.spec) it should be marked %config(noreplace). In fact all the >> *.php files in /etc/squirrelmail/ are. >> >

Re: [SM-USERS] New Squirrelmail RPM and Shared Calendar Plugin

2005-03-31 Thread Mike Klinke
On Thursday 31 March 2005 16:11, William Hooper wrote: > Looking at the .spec file > (http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/squirrelmail/FC-3/squi >rrelmail.spec) it should be marked %config(noreplace). In fact > all the *.php files in /etc/squirrelmail/ are. Looking at a diff between what

Re: [SM-USERS] New Squirrelmail RPM and Shared Calendar Plugin

2005-03-31 Thread William Hooper
Mike Klinke said: >> the RPM shouldn't overwrite your config file I would hope, so why not >> just reinstall the SCP and be done with it? > > It did overwrite the config file so the shared calendar just went > missing after the RPM upgrade. As you suggest, it was trivial to fix but > an annoyance

Re: [SM-USERS] New Squirrelmail RPM and Shared Calendar Plugin

2005-03-31 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
I don't know if this has been brought up before but I ran into a situation with this week's Fedora upgrade of Squirrelmail. I had previously implemented the "shared calendar plugin" (SCP). Since this plugin does not ship with the Fedora distribution and the SCP uses the same plugin directory

Re: [SM-USERS] New Squirrelmail RPM and Shared Calendar Plugin

2005-03-31 Thread Mike Klinke
On Thursday 31 March 2005 07:50, PL wrote: >>Has any thought been given to providing the SCP its >> own namespace? > > no. it is a drop-in replacement. it is going to replace the > calendar plugin in 1.5 once it stabilizes. If it's going to replace the regular calendar plugin then that'll take c

[SM-USERS] New Squirrelmail RPM and Shared Calendar Plugin

2005-03-30 Thread Mike Klinke
I don't know if this has been brought up before but I ran into a situation with this week's Fedora upgrade of Squirrelmail. I had previously implemented the "shared calendar plugin" (SCP). Since this plugin does not ship with the Fedora distribution and the SCP uses the same plugin director