Re: [SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug?)

2010-03-22 Thread Karl Pearson
On Mon, March 22, 2010 11:01 pm, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > 2010.03.23 00:14 Karl Pearson rašė: >> [apologies for top-posting. Those who want to know what this solution is >> about, read below my top-post.] >> >> Final: Counting is fine now. The true count is being show in all cases >> and >> reg

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug?)

2010-03-22 Thread Karl Pearson
[apologies for top-posting. Those who want to know what this solution is about, read below my top-post.] Final: Counting is fine now. The true count is being show in all cases and regardless of how deep my nested folders go. A thanks to Tomas for your help! Karl -- On Sat, M

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug?)

2010-03-20 Thread Karl Pearson
On Thu, March 18, 2010 11:16 am, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > > > Karl Pearson wrote: >> >> On Thu, March 18, 2010 2:58 am, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >>> Karl Pearson wrote: On Wed, March 17, 2010 1:55 pm, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > Karl Pearson wrote: >> >> I've emailed a couple times, wit

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug?)

2010-03-20 Thread Karl Pearson
On Thu, March 18, 2010 10:18 am, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Karl, > > Du meintest am 18.03.10: > >> Alpine can only use IMAP. It was formerly named Pine but hasn't >> changed. > > Alpine can use POP3 too. I use it only for this protocol since years. Wow, that's a new one for me. I just did a

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug?)

2010-03-18 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Karl Pearson wrote: > > On Thu, March 18, 2010 2:58 am, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >> Karl Pearson wrote: >>> On Wed, March 17, 2010 1:55 pm, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: Karl Pearson wrote: > > I've emailed a couple times, with the most recent just a week or so > ago about Squirrelmail no

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug?)

2010-03-18 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Karl, Du meintest am 18.03.10: > Alpine can only use IMAP. It was formerly named Pine but hasn't > changed. Alpine can use POP3 too. I use it only for this protocol since years. Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- Download

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug?)

2010-03-18 Thread Karl Pearson
On Thu, March 18, 2010 2:58 am, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > > > Karl Pearson wrote: >> >> On Wed, March 17, 2010 1:55 pm, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >>> >>> >>> Karl Pearson wrote: I've emailed a couple times, with the most recent just a week or so ago about Squirrelmail not reporting the

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug?)

2010-03-18 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Karl Pearson wrote: > > On Wed, March 17, 2010 1:55 pm, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >> >> >> Karl Pearson wrote: >>> >>> I've emailed a couple times, with the most recent just a week or so ago >>> about Squirrelmail not reporting the correct number of emails left >>> unread >>> in all my folders. >>>

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug?)

2010-03-17 Thread Karl Pearson
On Wed, March 17, 2010 1:55 pm, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > > > Karl Pearson wrote: >> >> I've emailed a couple times, with the most recent just a week or so ago >> about Squirrelmail not reporting the correct number of emails left >> unread >> in all my folders. >> >> I solved it by un-checking this o

Re: [SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug)

2010-03-17 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Karl Pearson wrote: > > I've emailed a couple times, with the most recent just a week or so ago > about Squirrelmail not reporting the correct number of emails left unread > in all my folders. > > I solved it by un-checking this option under Folders: > > Enable Cumulative Unread Message Notifi

[SM-USERS] Message Count Update (Solution/Bug)

2010-03-17 Thread Karl Pearson
I've emailed a couple times, with the most recent just a week or so ago about Squirrelmail not reporting the correct number of emails left unread in all my folders. I solved it by un-checking this option under Folders: Enable Cumulative Unread Message Notification: I guess I don't know what that