Re: [SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.

2005-12-06 Thread Vincent Blondel
I am back, I looked a bit a the last updates on Courier-Imap on FreeBSD and it seems there was a bug on it because in any situation Courier-Imap was always compiled with FAM support and this is just what we don't want. So I compiled last Courier-Imap (4.0.6) on the system with no FAM support.

Re: [SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.

2005-12-05 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>>> We are using squirrelmail since 2 years in our company but we >>> are now encountering some hard performance decrease. Our mail >>> system is composed by one server with next features : >> ... >> >>> OS : FreeBSD 4.11 >>> Apache 1.3.33 >>> PHP 4.3.x >>> Squirrelmail

Re: [SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.

2005-12-05 Thread Vincent Blondel
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 19:29 +0200, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > > We are using squirrelmail since 2 years in our company but we are > > now encountering some hard performance decrease. Our mail system > > is composed by one server with next features : > ... > > OS : FreeBSD 4.11 > >

Re: [SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.

2005-12-05 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> We are using squirrelmail since 2 years in our company but we are > now encountering some hard performance decrease. Our mail system > is composed by one server with next features : ... > OS : FreeBSD 4.11 > Apache 1.3.33 > PHP 4.3.x > Squirrelmail 1.4.x > FileSyst

Re: [SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.

2005-12-05 Thread Vincent Blondel
no 'fam' process running On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:33 +0200, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> We are using squirrelmail since 2 years in our company but we are now > >>> encountering some hard performance decrease. Our mail system is > >>> composed by one server with next features : > >>> >

Re: [SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.

2005-12-05 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>>> >>> >>> We are using squirrelmail since 2 years in our company but we are now >>> encountering some hard performance decrease. Our mail system is >>> composed by one server with next features : >>> >>> Motherboard : 2 * CPU AMD Athlon MP 1800+ >>> Memory : 1 G0 DDR >>> SCSI: 1 Con

Re: [SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.

2005-12-05 Thread Vincent Blondel
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA IDLE ACL ACL2=UNION STARTTLS] Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2005 Double Precision, Inc. See COPYING for distribution information. On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 10:31 +0200, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:

Re: [SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.

2005-12-05 Thread John Madden
> Courrier- Imap > > Everything ran fine untill we got less than 2000 mails per folder. At this > time I > began by trying to optimize the system. Investigate a switch to Cyrus. I was up against the same things with Courier (a few thousand users, about 2 million emails) and I believe it comes do

Re: [SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.

2005-12-05 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> > Hi all, > > > We are using squirrelmail since 2 years in our company but we are now > encountering some hard performance decrease. Our mail system is composed > by one server with next features : > > Motherboard : 2 * CPU AMD Athlon MP 1800+ > Memory : 1 G0 DDR > SCSI: 1 Controlle

[SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.

2005-12-05 Thread Vincent Blondel
Hi all, We are using squirrelmail since 2 years in our company but we are now encountering some hard performance decrease. Our mail system is composed by one server with next features : Motherboard : 2 * CPU AMD Athlon MP 1800+ Memory : 1 G0 DDR SCSI: 1 Controller Adaptec 5400s HD'