Re:[SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-08 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>>> /** >>> * IMAP authentication mechanism >>> * auth_mech can be either 'login', 'plain', 'cram-md5', or 'digest-md5' >>> */ >>> >>> >>> That probably answers my question, no Kerberos option available at >>> all. Is there a change_log for the 1.5 development versions? I'm >>> curious if Kerberos

RE: [SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-07 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier DUCROT > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re:[SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication > > It should be nice if i

Re:[SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-07 Thread Olivier DUCROT
relmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: RE: [SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication >> >> >> /** >> * IMAP authentication mechanism >> * auth_mech can be either 'login', 'plain', 'cram-md5', or > 'digest-md5'

RE: [SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-07 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Moseman > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 11:56 AM > To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication > > > /

RE: [SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-07 Thread Scott Moseman
ous if Kerberos authentication is going to be added anytime soon? Thanks, Scott Moseman -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Moseman Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 11:15 AM To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [SM-USERS]

[SM-USERS] Kerberos Authentication

2005-03-07 Thread Scott Moseman
We have all of our Apache websites authenticating against ActiveDirectory using Kerberos. So our users do not need to enter their username and password anymore (for most of our sites). I downloaded a couple of the SquirrelMail plug-ins for accepting previously entered login credentials, but I se