Re: Webmail.us & SquirrelMail [was Re: [SM-USERS] Infoworld Article]

2004-11-08 Thread p dont think
More publicity: http://www.it-director.com/article.php?articleid=12372 Note: "Why is this significant? Well not because it happened, but because the company chose to press release it." --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Exp

Re: Webmail.us & SquirrelMail [was Re: [SM-USERS] Infoworld Article]

2004-11-07 Thread Pat Matthews
else. Have a nice evening, Pat -Original Message- From: "p dont think" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sat, November 6, 2004 8:16 pm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Webmail.us & SquirrelMail [was Re: [SM-USERS] Infoworld Article] Pat, FYI, I a

Re: Webmail.us & SquirrelMail [was Re: [SM-USERS] Infoworld Article]

2004-11-06 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Bill, On Saturday, November 06, 2004, Bill Boebel wrote... > Is there a SM roadmap published somewhere? We've been working on getting together to put some plans down on paper, and get some ideas on what we want in the future. With our development team located in many different countries, an

Re: Webmail.us & SquirrelMail [was Re: [SM-USERS] Infoworld Article]

2004-11-06 Thread Bill Boebel
nice evening, > > > > Pat > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: "p dont think" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sat, November 6, 2004 8:16 pm > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Webmail

Re: Webmail.us & SquirrelMail [was Re: [SM-USERS] Infoworld Article]

2004-11-06 Thread p dont think
L PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Webmail.us & SquirrelMail [was Re: [SM-USERS] Infoworld Article] Pat, FYI, I am cc'ing this to the SquirrelMail-Users mailing list. Pat Matthews wrote: Hi Paul, Thanks again for pointing out the comments today about Webmail.us. There are, however, quite a few things that

Re: Webmail.us & SquirrelMail [was Re: [SM-USERS] Infoworld Article]

2004-11-06 Thread p dont think
Pat, FYI, I am cc'ing this to the SquirrelMail-Users mailing list. Pat Matthews wrote: Hi Paul, Thanks again for pointing out the comments today about Webmail.us. There are, however, quite a few things that I would personally like to make you aware of. First of all, I absolutely appreciate the ha

Re: [SM-USERS] Infoworld Article

2004-11-01 Thread p dont think
> > Thought everyone might be interested in this Infoworld article: > > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/10/29/HNwebmail_1.html > > It describes Webmail.us' recent conversion from Windows proprietary > systems to Open Source software like RedHat Linux, Postfix, Squirrelmail, > ClamAV and Courier

[SM-USERS] Infoworld Article

2004-10-31 Thread Jay Lee
Thought everyone might be interested in this Infoworld article: http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/10/29/HNwebmail_1.html It describes Webmail.us' recent conversion from Windows proprietary systems to Open Source software like RedHat Linux, Postfix, Squirrelmail, ClamAV and Courier. Great to s