lør, 10.09.2005 kl. 04.22 skrev Rich Hall:
> I also have to stop for a moment and say "Thanks to SM Team". SM is the best
> working
> webmail package I have found. The last package I ran was Twig and it was just
> awful
> from any admin and upgrade view along with it not being well documented.
Rich Hall wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I also have to stop for a moment and say "Thanks to SM Team". SM is the
> best working
> webmail package I have found. The last package I ran was Twig and it was
> just awful
> from any admin and upgrade view along with it not being well documented.
> On the
> THANK YOU TO EVERYONE ON THE SQUIRRELMAIL TEAM AND THE SQUIRRELMAIL
> PLUGINS TEAM! Your precious time, your help and your code, have helped
> hundreds of thousands of people! That's an amazing achievement and
> something to be immensely proud of! (And, if I recall correctly, isn't
> SM the webma
Rich Hall said the following on 9/9/2005 10:22 PM:
>Hey everyone,
>
>I also have to stop for a moment and say "Thanks to SM Team". SM is the best
>working
>webmail package I have found. The last package I ran was Twig and it was just
>awful
>from any admin and upgrade view along with it not bein
Hey everyone,
I also have to stop for a moment and say "Thanks to SM Team". SM is the best
working
webmail package I have found. The last package I ran was Twig and it was just
awful
from any admin and upgrade view along with it not being well documented. On the
other hand SM is stable, fast, f
