Re: [SM-USERS] Hairr pulling not helping to configure SM on NT

2004-09-15 Thread p dont think
Again, please direct replies to the mailing list. I owe you a million apologies, please allow this to be the first. In looking at the archive, I see this is the path definition as default: define('SM_PATH','../'); This gives me an error message on my NT server to wit: Exception: Access Violation (b

Re: [SM-USERS] Hairr pulling not helping to configure SM on NT

2004-09-15 Thread p dont think
ve provided, should this be the proper path? If not, what SHOULD it be?? Thanks - M -Original Message- From: p dont think [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 6:27 PM To: ARC Support Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Hairr pulling not helping to configure SM

Re: [SM-USERS] Hairr pulling not helping to configure SM on NT

2004-09-15 Thread p dont think
ARC Support wrote: I have been trying to get SM 1.4.3a running on NT4 SP6 with Apache 2.0.50, php 5.0.1 & Mercury 4.0.1a. I've followed every hint I've been able to glean from various info sites and there just isn't any doccumentation covering the new releases of SM, Apache, php and Mercury. What

[SM-USERS] Hairr pulling not helping to configure SM on NT

2004-09-15 Thread ARC Support
I have been trying to get SM 1.4.3a running on NT4 SP6 with Apache 2.0.50, php 5.0.1 & Mercury 4.0.1a. I've followed every hint I've been able to glean from various info sites and there just isn't any doccumentation covering the new releases of SM, Apache, php and Mercury. What I run into when call