Re: [SM-USERS] GPL question

2004-02-02 Thread William R. Mussatto
Konstantin Riabitsev said: > On 01.02.2004 23:07, David Prestwich wrote: >> About a month ago I came across a university >> using squirrelmail for one of their departments. >> They had renamed the software and gave no >> mention of squirrelmail - yet it was obvious it >> was. My question is: Is

Re: [SM-USERS] GPL question

2004-02-01 Thread Konstantin Riabitsev
On 01.02.2004 23:07, David Prestwich wrote: About a month ago I came across a university using squirrelmail for one of their departments. They had renamed the software and gave no mention of squirrelmail - yet it was obvious it was. My question is: Is it a violation of the GPL when a group renam

[SM-USERS] GPL question

2004-02-01 Thread David Prestwich
I have a question about the GPL and squirrelmail. We as a company have been using squirrelmail for some time now and it has truly changed the way our remote users go about email. Thanks to all. About a month ago I came across a university using squirrelmail for one of their departments. They ha