RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-24 Thread Jimmy Conner
Jimmy Conner said: > p dont think said: >>> >> > Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? >>> >> > >>> >> > -rkl >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core >> hacks >>> > to >>> >> get done. I have since rewritten the plugin and have the code to >>> > submit

RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-24 Thread Jimmy Conner
p dont think said: >> >> > Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? >> >> > >> >> > -rkl >> >> > >> >> >> >> It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core > hacks >> > to >> >> get done. I have since rewritten the plugin and have the code to >> > submit >> >> to CVS to get it to work,

RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-23 Thread p dont think
> >> > Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? > >> > > >> > -rkl > >> > > >> > >> It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core hacks > > to > >> get done. I have since rewritten the plugin and have the code to > > submit > >> to CVS to get it to work, but I have been busy with othe

RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-22 Thread rkl
just curious, will it looks/works similar with the left navigation but with out frames? Or if I could mention, similar to yahoo. -rkl > p dont think said: >>> > Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? >>> > >>> > -rkl >>> > >>> >>> It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core hack

RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-22 Thread Jimmy Conner
p dont think said: >> > Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? >> > >> > -rkl >> > >> >> It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core hacks > to >> get done. I have since rewritten the plugin and have the code to > submit >> to CVS to get it to work, but I have been busy with other

RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-21 Thread Jonathan Angliss
>> What is the approximate date of availability for 1.5? > > no date yet. no time soon meaning many many months... Also meaning that 1.5 is development releases, chances of an actual release are slim as most changes in development 1.5 are tested for a period, and ported back to the 1.4 relea

RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-21 Thread p dont think
> What is the approximate date of availability for 1.5? no date yet. no time soon meaning many many months... --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf -- squirrelmail-users mailing l

RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-20 Thread rkl
What is the approximate date of availability for 1.5? -thanks >> > Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? >> > >> > -rkl >> > >> >> It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core hacks > to >> get done. I have since rewritten the plugin and have the code to > submit >> to CVS to ge

Re: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-20 Thread rkl
That'll be great. Frame has its purpose but alot user preference is non-frame. thanks -rkl > rkl said: >> Just a real simple question. >> >> Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? >> >> -rkl >> > > It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core hacks to > get done. I have since rew

Re: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-19 Thread Jimmy Conner
rkl said: > Just a real simple question. > > Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? > > -rkl > It is in the works, a plugin was created but required a few core hacks to get done. I have since rewritten the plugin and have the code to submit to CVS to get it to work, but I have been busy with other th

[SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-19 Thread rkl
Just a real simple question. Can SM runs w/o in non-frame mode? -rkl --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archiv