Re: [SM-USERS] 100% busy disk

2005-03-23 Thread Jerry Mersel
Hi: Please don't misunderstand me. I am not blaming squirrelmail for eating up resources unnecessarily. I have seen other questions on this list, that don't have anything to do directly with squirrelmail, so I decided to ask my question as well. I am using serveral different tools to check the

Re: [SM-USERS] 100% busy disk

2005-03-23 Thread Mike Oliveri
> >I am running squirrelmail 1.4.3a, php 4.3.2, apache 2.0, on Redhat AS > > 3U3. > > > Sometimes "/" and swap are 100% busy. This happens when there are about > > 280 processes running. Could someone give me some tips? > > I have the LimitRequestBody set to 2500. Would lowering it help at

Re: [SM-USERS] 100% busy disk

2005-03-23 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Jerry, On Sunday, March 20, 2005, Jerry Mersel wrote... > Hi: >I am running squirrelmail 1.4.3a, php 4.3.2, apache 2.0, on Redhat AS > 3U3. > Sometimes "/" and swap are 100% busy. This happens when there are about > 280 processes running. Could someone give me some tips? > I have the L

[SM-USERS] 100% busy disk

2005-03-19 Thread Jerry Mersel
Hi: I am running squirrelmail 1.4.3a, php 4.3.2, apache 2.0, on Redhat AS 3U3. Sometimes "/" and swap are 100% busy. This happens when there are about 280 processes running. Could someone give me some tips? I have the LimitRequestBody set to 2500. Would lowering it help at all? How about s