Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - FATAL ERROR: Data dir (/usr/local/share/sqmail/data/) does not exist!

2009-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 22:22:44 Chris Hilts wrote: > David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote: > > Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction > > in effect. File(/usr/local/share/sqmail/data) is not within the allowed > > path(s): (/srv/http/:/srv/www:/home/:/tmp/:/usr/share/p

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - FATAL ERROR: Data dir (/usr/local/share/sqmail/data/) does not exist!

2009-06-16 Thread Chris Hilts
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote: > Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in > effect. File(/usr/local/share/sqmail/data) is not within the allowed path(s): > (/srv/http/:/srv/www:/home/:/tmp/:/usr/share/pear/) > in /srv/www/htdocs/squirrelmail/src/configtest.ph

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - FATAL ERROR: Data dir (/usr/local/share/sqmail/data/) does not exist!

2009-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 18:19:02 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote: > Paul, > > This one is obviously simple, but it has caught me off-guard. This is > with > sqmail 1.5 svn Rev. 13786. The problem is sqmail can't access the data and > attach directories. Web server write permission right? I

[SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - FATAL ERROR: Data dir (/usr/local/share/sqmail/data/) does not exist!

2009-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Paul, This one is obviously simple, but it has caught me off-guard. This is with sqmail 1.5 svn Rev. 13786. The problem is sqmail can't access the data and attach directories. Web server write permission right? I dunno? Doesn't look like it. The WARNINGS & FATAL ERROR given by

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - Updated to revision 13565 - signout redirect doesn't work? [SOLVED]

2009-04-19 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:55 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > David C. Rankin wrote: >> Paul, >> >>       I updated to the latest svn for 1.5 (revision 13565) and for some >> reason, my >> signout page no longer redirects to my home page and instead gives a 403 >> error. >> My config is: >> >> $sig

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - Updated to revision 13565 - signout redirect doesn't work? [SOLVED]

2009-04-19 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > I updated to the latest svn for 1.5 (revision 13565) and for some > reason, my > signout page no longer redirects to my home page and instead gives a 403 > error. > My config is: > > $signout_page = SM_PATH . 'config/3111return.html'; > > [13:37 nirvan

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - Updated to revision 13565 - signout redirect doesn't work?

2009-04-19 Thread Jon Angliss
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:46:54 -0500, "David C. Rankin" wrote: >Paul, > > I updated to the latest svn for 1.5 (revision 13565) and for some > reason, my >signout page no longer redirects to my home page and instead gives a 403 error. >My config is: > >$signout_page = SM_PATH . 'config/3111r

[SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - Updated to revision 13565 - signout redirect doesn't work?

2009-04-19 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul, I updated to the latest svn for 1.5 (revision 13565) and for some reason, my signout page no longer redirects to my home page and instead gives a 403 error. My config is: $signout_page = SM_PATH . 'config/3111return.html'; [13:37 nirvana:/srv/www/htdocs/squirrelmail/config] # cat

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn rev. 13318 still current

2008-11-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 14:05:00 Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:01 AM, David C. Rankin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Listmates, > > > >Just checking, is rev. 13318 still current for svn of 1.5? No > > problems, everything is great with squirrelmail, but it ju

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn rev. 13318 still current

2008-11-12 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:01 AM, David C. Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Listmates, > >Just checking, is rev. 13318 still current for svn of 1.5? No problems, > everything is great with squirrelmail, but it just seems that I haven't seen > any recent updates. Maybe squirrelmail is now

[SM-USERS] 1.5 svn rev. 13318 still current

2008-11-12 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, Just checking, is rev. 13318 still current for svn of 1.5? No problems, everything is great with squirrelmail, but it just seems that I haven't seen any recent updates. Maybe squirrelmail is now perfect? Thanks! -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltre

[SM-USERS] 1.5 Features

2004-05-07 Thread Brent S. Clark
Hi, Was just wondering what to expect when 1.5 becomes the stable squirrelmail. What plugins are now default and what new functionality may be included. Thanks! Brent S. Clark --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn deve

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-21 Thread Mark Courtney
I'm guessing that SM uses the same type of version numbering as the Linux kernel. Odd numbers are development versions and even numbers are stable releases. stable releases 1.4.x 1.2.x development releases 1.3.x 1.5.x Mark Courtney http://www.MarkCourtney.com __ +

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-04 Thread Jay Lee
Because it's not a stable release, although that's not abundantly clear on the Squirrelmail homepage. The announcement certainly makes it sound like a stable release. In any case, I've tested 1.5 and found it fairly stable, course that's just my account, not my 1500 users... And while I'm mentio

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-04 Thread Thomas Stephenson
On 4 Feb 2004 Chandler, Jacob R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any ideas why the Downloads page doesn't show the 1.5 version as the > latest stable release? Because it's not but I've just installed it on a system the other day using Mercury/32 v4.01a as the IMAP4 server and I've had no problems at

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-04 Thread William Hooper
Keith Hatfull said: > Well ... > > "The Development Team has released version 1.5.0. Included in this > release is the integration of the DMN plugin, some interface tweaks, and > many bugfixes. Enjoy." > > ...sounds like a stable release announcement to me. Doesn't to me. Compare it to the third

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-04 Thread Mark Courtney
I'm guessing that SM uses the same type of version numbering as the Linux kernel. Odd numbers are development versions and even numbers are stable releases. stable releases 1.4.x 1.2.x development releases 1.3.x 1.5.x Mark Courtney http://www.MarkCourtney.com __

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-04 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Any ideas why the Downloads page doesn't show the 1.5 version as the > latest stable release? Because stable are v.1.4.x releases. 1.5.x contains development releases. 1.5.0 is not stable. Many new features and drastic changes were introduced there. -- Tomas ---

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-04 Thread Chris Hilts
> "The Development Team has released version 1.5.0. Included in this > release is the integration of the DMN plugin, some interface tweaks, and > many bugfixes. Enjoy." > > ...sounds like a stable release announcement to me. > > So is it or isn't it...I've been running 1.5.0 [CVS] for a long time..

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-04 Thread Keith Hatfull
Marcio Merlone wrote: On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:54:02 -0600 "Chandler, Jacob R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any ideas why the Downloads page doesn't show the 1.5 version as the latest stable release? Weird... would it be possible that is because it is listed under the "Development Version" sect

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-04 Thread Marcio Merlone
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:54:02 -0600 "Chandler, Jacob R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any ideas why the Downloads page doesn't show the 1.5 version as the > latest stable release? Weird... would it be possible that is because it is listed under the "Development Version" section? Perhaps it is not th

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-04 Thread Chris Hilts
> Any ideas why the Downloads page doesn't show the 1.5 version as the > latest stable release? Because it isn't. 1.5.x is the developmental series. 1.4.2 is the current stable release. -- Chris Hilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The SF.Net email

[SM-USERS] 1.5

2004-02-04 Thread Chandler, Jacob R
Any ideas why the Downloads page doesn't show the 1.5 version as the latest stable release? Jacob Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See