On 4/12/12, Bot wrote:
>
> Thank you for the answers, they solved my issue.
Please quote the message you're replying to next time.
To be clear, my answer was confusing since I didn't respond correctly
to exactly what you were asking. You can't have more than one date
field in SquirrelMail 1.4.
Thank you for the answers, they solved my issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Other-sort-fields-in-squirrelmail-web-interface-tp33544983p33673864.html
Sent from the squirrelmail-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Thank you for the reply.
I agree that sorting by "sent" brings a certain dose of unreliability, and
my reasons to use it are a bit unusual ( one of bussiness processes require
us to check that date, and i can't teach my users to read mail headers).
Paul Lesniewski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 20
Bot wrote:
>
> Thank you for the reply.
> I agree that sorting by "sent" brings a certain dose of unreliability, and
> my reasons to use it are a bit unusual ( one of bussiness processes
> require us to check that date, and i can't teach my users to read mail
> headers).
>
You can chose to sor
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Bot wrote:
>
> Hello,
> is there a posibility to add more sorting fields in squirrelmail interface ?
> I'd like to sort mail by "sent" date.
Version 1.5.2 has more index options and could be easier to add to,
however, it's unusual to need to use the sent date (and
Hello,
is there a posibility to add more sorting fields in squirrelmail interface ?
I'd like to sort mail by "sent" date.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Other-sort-fields-in-squirrelmail-web-interface-tp33544983p33544983.html
Sent from the squirrelmail-users mailing l
