Re: [SM-USERS] [Spam] SECURITY: 1.4.12 Package Compromise

2007-12-15 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Dec 14, 2007 2:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > I can see your point Paul, better to be safer than sorry ;) > > Just being paranoid: how about plugins? We don't currently provide md5 sums for them, but that wouldn't be a bad idea for the "new website" --

Re: [SM-USERS] [Spam] SECURITY: 1.4.12 Package Compromise

2007-12-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, > I can see your point Paul, better to be safer than sorry ;) Just being paranoid: how about plugins? Thank you and best regards. Cássio - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marke

Re: [SM-USERS] [Spam] SECURITY: 1.4.12 Package Compromise

2007-12-13 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Dec 13, 2007 2:33 PM, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Jon, if the MD5 passed on the package we downloaded back then, > would you still recommend replacing ? A diff -r shows no changes between > it and a fresh d/l.. In a situation like this, yes, it is always best to get a new download,