On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 03:12, Iain Pople wrote:
> Rafael Martinez Guerrero wrote:
>
> > Some time ago, we tried a version of the session handler that did what
> > you suggest and we had big problems with transactions that were not
> > finnished and waiting for a commit. After a while all connection
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 12:35, Pallav Kumar Dutta wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you suggest without using DB, is it possible to rectify the
> problem as we are not using DB .
> Regards
> pkdutta
>
As Iain suggested in squirrelmail-devel, we should modified the function
sqsession_is_active() in some way to not
Hi,Can you suggest without using DB, is it possible to rectify the
problem as we are not using DB .Regardspkdutta>
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 04:32, Iain Pople wrote:>> > With
this, you dont have real load balancing and automatic feilover. I>> > do not understand why to use IP persistency when you shar
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 04:32, Iain Pople wrote:
> > With this, you dont have real load balancing and automatic feilover. I
> > do not understand why to use IP persistency when you share session data
> > between servers. Well I can understand it if you use NFS to share the
> > files but not if you us
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 04:50, Iain Pople wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
Hello
> Thanks for your post. I have some questions about your session handling
> code.
>
> Isn't it necessary to have some sort of transaction locking? When you
> use file based sessions the OS automatically stops multiple process
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 08:07, Iain Pople wrote:
> Rafael Martinez Guerrero wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > This is the same problem we had some months ago. We reported this to the
> > list in august 2005 and it take us very heavy debugging to find out the
> > cause of this. More information here:
> >
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 07:26, Iain Pople wrote:
[]
>
> The advantage of using the NFS share is that we can bring down a front
> end without the user losing their session.
>
> We did look into a postgres based custom session handler but found that
> performance wasn't satisfactory (we
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 06:53, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> > The 3 webmail front ends are load balanced behind an Alteon load
> > balancer with IP persistency. Sessions are stored on the NFS mount.
>
> While I don't believe it's likely to happen too often, there is a
> possibility that the session id