Re: [SM-USERS] more encoding problems

2009-10-16 Thread Squirrel Dennis
>>> There is another problem as well. When the From address contains , and >>> æøå >>> it's not possilbe to >>> reply without an error. >>> >>> Normally the From-adress is put into "" like "John Dove" >>> >>> >>> In SM 1.4.20 SVN (and all versions I have tested) this changes into >>> >>> Monstad,

Re: [SM-USERS] more encoding problems

2009-10-16 Thread Squirrel Dennis
> There is another problem as well. When the From address contains , and æøå > it's not possilbe to > reply without an error. > > Normally the From-adress is put into "" like "John Dove" > > > In SM 1.4.20 SVN (and all versions I have tested) this changes into > > Monstad, Pål > > When the from a

Re: [SM-USERS] Inbox Disappeared

2008-10-21 Thread Squirrel Dennis
Yes it's most probable, you or somebody who knows your account (wife,..) use another email client from time to time. This other client is configured to fetch all emails and clean up the inbox folder. Have a look to your computer or friends computer you read your email too and you will find all of y

Re: [SM-USERS] Request receipt acknowledge failure

2008-10-20 Thread Squirrel Dennis
> Hi, Dennis! > I have to renew extensive exim4 studies. I remember that it has a lots of > useful debug functions - such as send email directly using command line, > with verbose logging what is it doing. Problem that I do not know what > filter, transport is should work for this situation. Also i

Re: [SM-USERS] sendreceipt privacy problem

2008-10-20 Thread Squirrel Dennis
> > Headers for a regular message are not relevant since the sending > process is not the same. If you made the sending process more > similar, that is, let the user choose who to send the message out just > like on the normal compose screen, then it could send the message as > the desired alias.

Re: [SM-USERS] Request receipt acknowledge failure

2008-10-19 Thread Squirrel Dennis
>> mta is broken? Does not accept "<> sender". > > You're right, I mis-read the error. Looks like you're right, > smtp.upcmail.hu is rejecting the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address. In > the end ONLY YOU know who the *original* mail was sent from and to and > then where the receipt was being sent back to

Re: [SM-USERS] sendreceipt privacy problem

2008-10-16 Thread Squirrel Dennis
> Hi, Dennis > You right, the host also could be suspiciouse - UPC Hungary - they > frequently changes configurations, without annoncement :( > Also sm (1.4.9a) for Debian stable does not changed for very long time! > Unfortunatelly I do not realized what time exactly the functionality is > broken

Re: [SM-USERS] sendreceipt privacy problem

2008-10-15 Thread Squirrel Dennis
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:41:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: test From: "Squirrel Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-

Re: [SM-USERS] sendreceipt privacy problem

2008-10-15 Thread Squirrel Dennis
Hi Tovis, send/read receipt is a question of configuration of your mta. So my problem is always waiting for getting solved. Because I know this problem, my solution is don't send any read receipt to unknown people to hide my private email address. CU Dennis > Send receipt does not work for me and

[SM-USERS] sendreceipt privacy problem

2008-10-15 Thread Squirrel Dennis
Hello Squirrels, I like this webmailer very well since many years. Thank you for your work! I found a problem while sending read receipt. I don't use my private email address for public purposes, I've a lot of email-aliases (I configured a lot of advanced identities too). So somebody wrote me and