Re: [SM-USERS] Empty Folders

2007-06-17 Thread No Spam
- Original Message From: Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: No Spam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 12:07:26 PM Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Empty Folders >Have you applied UW preset >(http://www.squirrelm

Re: [SM-USERS] Empty Folders

2007-06-17 Thread No Spam
- Original Message From: Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: No Spam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 1:09:25 AM Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Empty Folders >"If ~/mhobbs/something and /mail/folders/mhobbs/so

Re: [SM-USERS] Empty Folders

2007-06-16 Thread No Spam
- Original Message From: Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 4:03:34 PM Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Empty Folders >If ~mhobbs/mtl-spam-filter and /mail/folders/mhobbs/mtl-spam-filter is &

Re: [SM-USERS] Empty Folders

2007-06-16 Thread No Spam
and NFS to access them. We have our mail server setup so all INBOX mail is stored on the mail server on a filesystem /var/mail/ and all IMAP mail folders are also stored on the mail server on a file system called /mail/users// TEST_7Request: A003 LSUB "" "*%" Response:

[SM-USERS] Empty Folders

2007-06-15 Thread No Spam
Hello, I seem to be having a few issues with SquirrelMail and was hoping someone might be able to help. Red Hat Enterprise AS 4.0 SquirrelMail version:1.4.10a PHP version 4.3.10 Exim 4.34 Apache 2.0.59 UW IMAP4rev1 2004.352 Mail spool files (inbox) are kept in /var/mail/ IMAP Folders are kept in

[SM-USERS] Reply and From Address crossing over from other domains on the server

2006-01-08 Thread spam
Hi,   Box is a Redhat 9.0., running Plesk 7.01, PHP 4.4.1, and MYSQL 3.23   Let’s say that I have two domains on the site that both use the email address of contact@   Both users can log into their own accounts using their different username and password and neither can see the other

[SM-USERS] invalid mailboxname

2005-10-13 Thread Spam-Benachrichtigung
Hi, we are running Squirrelmail. MTA is Postfix, cyrus is the imap-server. When I login to SM I get the error-message "Invalid mailboxname" I think it's a problem with my imap Server. The path to our mailboxes is (postfix) /var/spool/mail Need help, thanks for any hints. Roland

RE: [SM-USERS] Invalid mailbox name

2005-09-29 Thread Spam-Benachrichtigung
> Do you have something related to Turkish translation? no language is german > could you connect to imap server and check if you can select inbox without > squirrelmail? > > telnet your-imap-server 143 yes, I can connect to imap-server, but some users work and some not. Those users are able

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem with sending mail - error 354

2005-01-04 Thread Spam
mail 15085 invoked by uid 0); 4 Jan 2005 12:40:25 +0100 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by mail.tnonline.net (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.23st (spamassassin: 3.0.2. Clear:RC:0(127.0.0.1):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. Processed in 10.571714 secs); 04 Jan 2005 11:40:25 -

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem with sending mail - error 354

2005-01-04 Thread Spam
>> I just recently started getting problems with SquirrelMail. Whenever >> I try to send an email it takes about 60 seconds then I get an error >> in the Compose screen: "Server replied: 354". > 354 is just the server asking for data ala: > 354 End data with . oh ok. >> I have no ide

[SM-USERS] Problem with sending mail - error 354

2005-01-02 Thread Spam
Hello, I just recently started getting problems with SquirrelMail. Whenever I try to send an email it takes about 60 seconds then I get an error in the Compose screen: "Server replied: 354". I have no idea how to track down what is causing this. According to the logs on the mailsever

RE: [SM-USERS] Problem with gzipped attachments

2003-09-10 Thread Spam Trap
Are both the sending and receiving MUA using SM against a non-MS MTA? I've seen this problem when the sending MUA is going against an Exchange server, where the default type for attachments was... damn, I can't remember. Something like Base-64, I think. It was the attachment encoding on the sendi