RE: [SM-USERS] How to improve security for SM users

2003-07-14 Thread Scott Henderson
I put in the code you wrote, and it works great. Thanks so much! It's always awesome to have someone just write the code you need, and voila' - now I have the functionality my company requires! This is another example of why Open Source software is so great. Its the people - you can't beat tha

[SM-USERS] Re: Links plugin breaks SquirrelSpell

2003-07-11 Thread Scott Henderson
>> FYI, the "Links Buttons" plug-in breaks SquirrelSpell on my system: >> >> SM 1.4.1-0.2.7.x (Links did the same thing with 1.4.0) >> OS = RH Enterprise ES 2.1 >> >> Scott > > You should post *how* it breaks SM. Although the author seems to be MIA. > But still, for the record, please report any

RE: [SM-USERS] How to improve security for SM users

2003-07-11 Thread Scott Henderson
> Nicholas Mistry> The statement: session_cache_limiter('nocache'); would need to come before any calls to session_start(). So not necessarily every PHP file but every PHP file that made a call to session_start() instead. Although, I have no clue how se

RE: [SM-USERS] How to improve security for SM users

2003-07-10 Thread Scott Henderson
> Marc Groot Koerkamp> > Andre Nicholson said: >> The statement: >> >> session_cache_limiter('nocache'); >> >> would need to come before any calls to session_start(). So not >> necessarily >> every PHP >> file but every PHP file that made a call to session_start() instead. >> >> Although, I have n

[SM-USERS] Using sendmail with SM

2003-07-10 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
When I first set up SM, I used it's own MTA to send out the mail, via a gateway mail server. Then for kicks I tried sendmail. I was surprised to see it took 1/3 as long to send mail this way - at least it appears that way to the user, since it takes 10 seconds instead of 30 to get back to the nex

RE: [SM-USERS] Re: SquirrelSpell won't work on RH Enterprise ES v2.1

2003-07-08 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
FWIW, I uninstalled 1.4.0 and installed 1.4.1-0.2.7.x.noarch.rpm and it's fixed. -Original Message- From: Scott Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SM-USERS] Re: SquirrelSpell won't work on RH Enterprise ES

[SM-USERS] "Read Receipt" replies misaddressed by SM

2003-07-08 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
If I receive an email from: "Joe Blow @ work" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> And Joe requested a read receipt when he sent it, I will receive a popup asking if I want to send the read receipt. If I click yes, I get the error: Requested action not taken: mailbox name not allowed Server replied: 553 malfor

RE: [SM-USERS] How to improve security for SM users

2003-07-08 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
I don't code, but I'm willing to try this. What file would I put this into- login.php? src/webmail.php? >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm not a php expert but isn't there a > session_cache_limiter(); > function that can be used to stop the browser caching? > > i.e. > > /

[SM-USERS] SquirrelSpell won't work on RH Enterprise ES v2.1

2003-07-03 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
Have installed SM and selected the SquirrelSpell plugin in the config file, but when user is composing and clicks on "Check Spelling" button, a window pops up with "SquirrelSpell Initiating - Please wait, communicating with the server... SquirrelSpell v0.3.8" --and this window doesn't change - a

RE: [SM-USERS] Should I use a database like MySQL or just do without?

2003-06-13 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
No one can answer this??? :( -Original Message- From: Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SM-USERS] Should I use a database like MySQL or just do without? I have searched the archives and

RE: [SM-USERS] Running conf.pl and patching SM

2003-06-13 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
>Do I need a specific software to run conf.pl? I tried using the >browser but it says I need to use the command line. I also tried >using the execute function in my ftp software but only got a copy of >the conf.pl file saved on my desktop. in the directory with conf.pl, run: perl conf.pl >Al

[SM-USERS] using TLS/SSL with an Exchange 5.5 server backend?

2003-06-11 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
Has anyone done this successfully? Got any tips? (I know, don't bet on the races...) --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 -

[SM-USERS] Should I use a database like MySQL or just do without?

2003-06-11 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
I have searched the archives and the wiki but haven't found my answers: I plan to set up SM for a few hundred users, likely no more than 20-30 connected at any one time. SM will connect to an Exchange server for the rear end... um, I guess I mean backend :). I have MySQL installed on the box.

RE: [SM-USERS] Ack! Post mod_php blow-up

2003-06-06 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
Jonathan, I really am pretty clueless on this, but since things can be pretty quiet on a Friday night, I'll throw out my suggestion. Looks to me like the mod_php you put on there now requires something that you don't have - a file called DB.php. Which makes me think the mod_php you upgraded to re

RE: [SM-USERS] appending a disclaimer to email 's

2003-06-06 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
I believe that is what the "Email Footer" plugin is for. >> I need to append a disclaimer to the end of my squirrelmail messages. I >> cant find anything in the archives or in the documentation. >> >> I know disclaimers suck and hold no value but i dont have an option. I >> guess I can do this

[SM-USERS] RE: SM Web access for exchange

2003-06-05 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
> From: Elijah Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Has anyone here ever set this combo up before. Right now I have SM > accessing a exchange server but having a few problems. I hated reposting > the message but no replies before if you may be able to help me with > this setup I would appreciate y

[SM-USERS] RE: Disabling IMAP

2003-06-05 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
>> I just set up SM on a RH Enterprise ES box and didn't install any IMAP >> server on it at all. SM is working fine, pointing to an Exchange server >> for IMAP. > >Sheesh. Is Exchange providing IMAP services? Jeez, I guess that makes it >an IMAP server. >Is SquirrelMail retrieving the folders a

RE: [SM-USERS] Disabling IMAP

2003-06-04 Thread Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix
I just set up SM on a RH Enterprise ES box and didn't install any IMAP server on it at all. SM is working fine, pointing to an Exchange server for IMAP. -Original Message- From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SM-