Re: [SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-16 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 16, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Not really related to tables anyhow. My mistake, blame the lack of sleep on that one, in most places, I mean to take the conversation to frames over tables, but managed to foobar that one pretty good. I will correct my statements later.

Re: [SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-16 Thread Scott Haneda
ber 14, 2008 10:21 pm, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Scott Haneda >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Nov 13, 2008, at 7:31 AM, Alan in Toronto wrote: >>>> On Wed, November 12, 2008 8:31 pm, Scott Haneda wrote: >>>>&g

Re: [SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-16 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 15, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Nov 15, 2008, at 2:02 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Scott Haneda >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-16 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 15, 2008, at 8:44 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:55 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Scott Haneda >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-15 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 15, 2008, at 2:02 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Scott Haneda > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Nov 14, 2008, at 7:21 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> >>> Also, if you can please report the style name for the table issue >

Re: [SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-15 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:55 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Scott Haneda > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Nov 14, 2008, at 7:21 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> >>> You are welcome to play with the default (or default advanced) >&

Re: [SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-14 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 14, 2008, at 7:21 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Also, if you can please report the style name for the table issue you > identified (and even the fix if you find it), I will put the fix into > the default skins. http://www.newgeo.com/web/misc/231144-css-underscore.png Maybe just forget thos

Re: [SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-14 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 14, 2008, at 7:21 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > You are welcome to play with the default (or default advanced) skin in > 1.5.2 and change it to suit your needs (and share with the community > please). Once 1.5.2 becomes more stable, the hope is that it catches > on and people begin to devel

Re: [SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-14 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 14, 2008, at 7:21 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Nov 13, 2008, at 7:31 AM, Alan in Toronto wrote: >>> On Wed, November 12, 2008 8:31 pm, Scott Haneda wrote: >>>> Current

Re: [SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-14 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 13, 2008, at 7:31 AM, Alan in Toronto wrote: > On Wed, November 12, 2008 8:31 pm, Scott Haneda wrote: >> Currently I would like to improve on the issue in this image: >> http://www.newgeo.com/web/misc/172910-sm.png >> There is plenty of room to show more o

[SM-USERS] Changing the UI views in current dev SM

2008-11-12 Thread Scott Haneda
Currently I would like to improve on the issue in this image: http://www.newgeo.com/web/misc/172910-sm.png There is plenty of room to show more of the name, how can I accomplish this? As seen in this image, there is a grey area to the right, this can be larger at times, is there any way to get

Re: [SM-USERS] Search questions

2008-11-12 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 12, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> SquirrelMail version: >> 1.5.2 [SVN] > > There's your SM version. You should probably start by downloading a > fresh copy of a 1.5.2SVN snapshot. Ok, downloaded the current SVN just now, installed, copied over the config file and set data

Re: [SM-USERS] Search questions

2008-11-12 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:05 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Scott Haneda > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Nov 12, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [SM-USERS] Search questions

2008-11-12 Thread Scott Haneda
On Nov 12, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> I am using the current development version of SM, when I do a search >> on all folders, with the other fields set to any of the options,

[SM-USERS] Search questions

2008-11-12 Thread Scott Haneda
I am using the current development version of SM, when I do a search on all folders, with the other fields set to any of the options, I get the error below, can someone suggest a fix on my end, or is this a known issue in SM? ERROR ERROR: Bad or malformed request. Query: FETCH (BODY.PEEK[HEA

[SM-USERS] Getting return receipt to work

2008-10-29 Thread Scott Haneda
I see this in my headers of sent email in SM Return-Receipt-To: @ What defines this address, so I can get SM to pick up my full email address? src/configtest.php SquirrelMail configtest SquirrelMail version: 1.5.2 [SVN] Config file version: 1.5.0 Config file last modified: 06 October 2008 23:

Re: [SM-USERS] General about address book in SM

2008-10-06 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 5, 2008, at 1:42 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> Using version >> $config_version = '1.4.0'; Here is the correct output SquirrelMail version: 1.5.2 [SVN] Config file vers

Re: [SM-USERS] General about address book in SM

2008-10-06 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 6, 2008, at 10:28 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Oct 6, 2008, at 8:14 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>&

Re: [SM-USERS] General about address book in SM

2008-10-06 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 6, 2008, at 8:14 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Oct 5, 2008, at 1:42 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> >>>> Using version >>>> $config_version = '1.5.0'; &

Re: [SM-USERS] General about address book in SM

2008-10-06 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 5, 2008, at 1:42 AM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> Using version >> $config_version = '1.5.0'; >> This is 1.5.1 development version > > 1.5.1 is not supported. You need to install 1.5.2. I look at this page: http://www.squirrelmail.org/download.php I only see 1.5.1 listed, so I am not sure h

Re: [SM-USERS] General about address book in SM

2008-10-04 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 4, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Karl Pearson wrote: >>> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Scott Haneda wrote: >>> >>>> I have alw

Re: [SM-USERS] Previous user's folders and email visible

2008-10-04 Thread Scott Haneda
I do not quite understand the trouble report. What is an OD account? What are common folders like drafts in reference to? It seems to me you describe a perfectly valid setup. A user logged in to an account who is able to read email in the IMAP folders of that account. I'm sure you have a

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-04 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 3, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Chris Hilts wrote: > Scott Haneda wrote: >> Nice stats, thanks. I am strongly looking into Dovecot with maildir >> format, anyone care to comment on that? I know it is still in beta, >> but it seems solid, abd builds clean on OS X in test so fa

Re: [SM-USERS] Search Error

2008-10-04 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 2, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Marc Powell wrote: > > On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Karl Pearson wrote: > >> On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Scott Haneda wrote: >> >>> SM 1.5.2. running a basic search >>> >>> ERROR >>> ERROR: Unknown IMAP respon

Re: [SM-USERS] General about address book in SM

2008-10-03 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Karl Pearson wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Scott Haneda wrote: > >> I have always been a little confused about this. In the SM address >> book, I can add a nickname, email, first, and last, as well as >> additional info. >> >> Wheneve

[SM-USERS] General about address book in SM

2008-10-03 Thread Scott Haneda
I have always been a little confused about this. In the SM address book, I can add a nickname, email, first, and last, as well as additional info. Whenever I make a new email, only the email address is put in to the to field. Not the "pretty" version of First Last <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Also,

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-03 Thread Scott Haneda
Nice stats, thanks. I am strongly looking into Dovecot with maildir format, anyone care to comment on that? I know it is still in beta, but it seems solid, abd builds clean on OS X in test so far. On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:34 AM, Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > Select times for mailbox with 5000 message

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail after upgrade to 1.4.13 fails on large folders

2008-10-03 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:49 AM, Jacek Osiecki wrote: > I am experiencing problems with all squirrelmail releases newer than > 1.4.9a. > Ewerywhere where I have upgraded from 1.4.9a to 1.4.13, squirrelmail > fails > to read large folders, containing more than 3000 messages. > Squirrelmail is > s

[SM-USERS] Search Error

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
SM 1.5.2. running a basic search ERROR ERROR: Unknown IMAP response. Query: SEARCH CHARSET "ISO-8859-1" ALL FROM "test" Reason Given: no character sets supported How can I resolve this? -- Scott - This SF.Net email is spons

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 1, 2008, at 9:58 PM, Karl Pearson wrote: >> And the EIMS developer showed surprising ignorance regarding this >> fact. That's the biggest sign to me that you need to find a better >> IMAP server. > > Might I suggest switching to Dovecot. I don't know if it's possible, > but > when I made

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 1, 2008, at 7:45 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> Not off the top of my head. It's been a long time since I've delved >> into it, my Real Life has really slammed my development time. > > If you insist on keeping enormous INBOXes (bad form IMO), try > SquirrelMail 1.5.2, where header fetching

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 1, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Chris Hilts wrote: > Scott Haneda wrote: >> Hello, I am running SquirrelMail 1.4.16, against EIMS Mail Server >> which support IMAP. >> >> SquirrelMail is very slow at loading mailboxes. EIMS stores mail >> in a >> single file,

Re: [SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
On Oct 1, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Chris Hilts wrote: > Scott Haneda wrote: >> Hello, I am running SquirrelMail 1.4.16, against EIMS Mail Server >> which support IMAP. >> >> SquirrelMail is very slow at loading mailboxes. EIMS stores mail >> in a >> single file,

[SM-USERS] performance issues that seemingly can not be solved.

2008-10-01 Thread Scott Haneda
Hello, I am running SquirrelMail 1.4.16, against EIMS Mail Server which support IMAP. SquirrelMail is very slow at loading mailboxes. EIMS stores mail in a single file, like UW IMAP server. If I telnet into the server, and select a mailbox, one in which I feel it is not that large, perhaps