On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 14:31 +0200, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 08:28 +0200, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> > A real example:
> >> > =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E5vard_Hegre=2C_UIO?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> SquirrelMail stores address in encoded form, but has to decode it in
>
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 11:35 +0100, Fredrik Jervfors wrote:
> > We are having some problems with how squirrelmail process some e-mail
> > addresses when they are encoded in this way:
> >
> > =?US-ASCII?Q?Martinez Guerrero=2c_Rafael?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I don't think that spaces are allowed in
Hello
We are having some problems with how squirrelmail process some e-mail
addresses when they are encoded in this way:
=?US-ASCII?Q?Martinez Guerrero=2c_Rafael?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This line is the samme as this one:
"martinez guerrero, rafael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When squirrelmail 'replay t
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 17:57, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
> >
> >> Both users use Internet Explorer, right?
> >>
> >> Which Windows version and which Explorer version?
> >
> > I suspect you are right that they are both using Windows and IE, but I'm
> > not ce
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 12:33, Fredrik Jervfors wrote:
> > SM-1.4.6 Release Candidate 1 has been available since Dec 10, 2005, that
> > is more than two months ago.
> >
> > Anyone knows when the final 1.4.6 release will available?
>
> According to a post earlier today, it will be released Wednesday.
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:59, daniel wrote:
> No idea. Have you tried SM-1.5.1? It works great!
>
Hei
No, I did not, but I really don't want to install a development version
in a production system with some thousands users ;)
--
Rafael Martinez, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Center for Information Techno
Hello
SM-1.4.6 Release Candidate 1 has been available since Dec 10, 2005, that
is more than two months ago.
Anyone knows when the final 1.4.6 release will available?
--
Rafael Martinez, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Center for Information Technology Services
University of Oslo, Norway
PGP Public Key:
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 03:12, Iain Pople wrote:
> Rafael Martinez Guerrero wrote:
>
> > Some time ago, we tried a version of the session handler that did what
> > you suggest and we had big problems with transactions that were not
> > finnished and waiting for a c
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 12:35, Pallav Kumar Dutta wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you suggest without using DB, is it possible to rectify the
> problem as we are not using DB .
> Regards
> pkdutta
>
As Iain suggested in squirrelmail-devel, we should modified the function
sqsession_is_active() in some way to not
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 04:32, Iain Pople wrote:
> > With this, you dont have real load balancing and automatic feilover. I
> > do not understand why to use IP persistency when you share session data
> > between servers. Well I can understand it if you use NFS to share the
> > files but not if you us
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 04:50, Iain Pople wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
Hello
> Thanks for your post. I have some questions about your session handling
> code.
>
> Isn't it necessary to have some sort of transaction locking? When you
> use file based sessions the OS automatically stops multiple process
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 08:07, Iain Pople wrote:
> Rafael Martinez Guerrero wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > This is the same problem we had some months ago. We reported this to the
> > list in august 2005 and it take us very heavy debugging to find out the
> &g
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 07:26, Iain Pople wrote:
[]
>
> The advantage of using the NFS share is that we can bring down a front
> end without the user losing their session.
>
> We did look into a postgres based custom session handler but found that
> performance wasn't satisfactory (we
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 10:36, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
[.]
> It seems we're seeing the same. Would you care to share your patch
> that disallows the "(deleted)" SID?
As I said, we use our own sessions_handler and a database to store the
sessions data. We did not patch squirrelmail code but o
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 06:53, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> > The 3 webmail front ends are load balanced behind an Alteon load
> > balancer with IP persistency. Sessions are stored on the NFS mount.
>
> While I don't believe it's likely to happen too often, there is a
> possibility that the session id
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 02:52, Iain Pople wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am experiencing a strange bug with squirrelmail. The symptoms are as
> follows:
>
> Sometimes when a user sends an email the from address changes to another
> user's email address who is logged in at the same time.
>
> e.g. user A has
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 23:33, john crawford wrote:
Hello
>
> As I've now seen sess_deleted files show up in the php
> cache, it seems to be an issue with the sess_deleted php / IE bug.
>
This is not an IE bug. I have seen users with this problem using
firefox,IE,mozilla,safari and Opera with Wi
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 07:16, john crawford wrote:
[...]
>
> I like the odds of this being our problem. It's hard to believe two
> session keys in a large space of random nature would map identically
> very often (and if it would, I'd expect the possibility to be caught by
> the code in so
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 04:55, David Rees wrote:
> On 7/28/05, Rafael Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The only explanation I can find to our problem is that the same happens
> > when using SM via a 'proxy' or that 'this' proxy in particular is not
> > working as it should.
> >
> > Any
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 14:15, Chris Green wrote:
[...]
> Surely this is just to do with how IE works, presumably the session
> parameters for Squirremail must be stored somewhere locally (cookies?)
> on the computer and they're being 'shared' with the conequences you
> see.
>
> I don't see how
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:18, John Madden wrote:
> > No, not at all. Three consecutive request can be served by three
> > different webservers.
>
> So is there something in your SQL session handler (locking?) that prevents
> multiple servers from clashing?
>
> John
>
John, I do not understand wh
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:23, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
[]
>
> > Can this happen? What is the probability of two different users getting
> > the same session ID?
>
> Note it is not only two users, but two web servers. It is possible,
> but the possibility of it is probably VERY slim. The
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 22:21, p dont think wrote:
[]
>
> Hrm. Have you done any special tweaking to your postgres setup to make
> it as highly responsive as you obviously need it to be?
>
- postgresql 7.4.7 in a server with 4GB ram and 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(TM)
CPU 2.80GHz.
- Backup/log
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 16:20, John Madden wrote:
[]
> > Another reason is that we want full/instantaneous automatic feilover. If
> > we use persistence with a 15-second timeout, many users will get
> > problems if the server they are using stops working.
>
> Doesn't LVS handle this automagicall
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 22:13, p dont think wrote:
[]
> >
> > We have to proxy servers in front of the imap servers, and three imap
> > servers connected to an EVA RAID storage solution from HP running a
> > ServiceGuard software.
>
> What IMAP server are you using? Does Perdition work wel
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 01:01, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>
> - User 1 logs in to webserver 1, gets session id abc123
>
> - User 2 logs in to webserver 2, gets session id abc123 and trashes
> current contents of abc123 session file
>
Can this happen? What is the probability of two different
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:57, p dont think wrote:
>
> > The only change in the SM code to save session data in a DB is a
> > "require_once("db_sessions.php")" line in functions/global.php to
> > include a file we have programed to define the
> > "session_set_save_handler()" code used to access the
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:14, John Madden wrote:
> > I don't think this has been raised before. You are looking for a
> > database replacement for the attachments directory? I suppose there
> > could be an option to upload files straight to the db as blobs or
> > something, but thus far there has
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:11, John Madden wrote:
> > We use LVS to access the webservers so we have full
> > failover/redundancy/load balancing at webserver level. The database is
> > working perfect but we need to do something with it if we want to have
> > an automatic failover/redundancy at this
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:57, p dont think wrote:
[..]
> > [.]
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > We have a cluster of 4 linux servers running SM without problems.
> >
> > 3 webservers running apache/PHP/SM and a database server running
> > postgreSQL for sessions/addressbooks/userprefs.
> >
> >
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 12:11, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > I have 'size' enable but I do not get the 'sort square-icon' like I get
> > with From, Date, Subject. Anything else I have to enable?
>
> press [Thread View] or [unThread View]
:) When I press [Thread View], the 'sort square-icon' for From,
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 11:33, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > I wonder if it is possible to sort by size with SM-1.4.4?
> > I have found this e-mail from oct 2004, but no answer to it.
>
> default size is not a displayed collums so sort is not possible, enable it
> and you can sort on size as well
I ha
Hello
I wonder if it is possible to sort by size with SM-1.4.4?
I have found this e-mail from oct 2004, but no answer to it.
---
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 09:52, Daniel Watts wrote:
> Guys - attached below is a thread from 11/2003. I was just wo
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 21:07, Freedman, Daniel B - Arlington, VA -
Contractor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am running SM (now 1.43) and trying to use SQL Server as my DB
> for addresses and prefs.
>
> I set up the database and ODBC but now SM wants a type in the DSN string
> like MYSQL//host etc
>
Hello
We are using SM-1.4.2 in production with a postgreSQL database to store
addressbook, userprefs and sessions.
We have found a problem with the addressbook functionality in SM.
In 1.4.2:
-
- Users can add a new entry with uppercase and lowercase in the
'Nickname'.
- Users can delete
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 15:34, Lee Brink wrote:
> Rafael Martinez Guerrero said:
> > We were using oracle with Squirrelmail until january but we are using
> > postgreSQL now for saving addressbook/userprefs and sessions (better
> > speed and less resources).
> >
> >
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 18:28, Lee Brink wrote:
[.]
>
> I'm open to any suggestions on what's going on, and potential avenues to
> debug. I'm currently hitting a brick wall.
>
> Lee
>
> -
Hello Lee
We were using oracle with Squirrelmail until january but we are using
postgreSQL now
Hello
I have installed this plugin but when I try to use it I get an error
message from the imap server:
ERROR : Bad or malformed request.
Query: STORE 348 +FLAGS (\Archived)
Server responded: Invalid system flag in Store command
I use cyrus. Any ideas to fix this?
--
With regards
Rafael Martin
Hello
I have a server running SM-1.2.11 with avelsieve version 0.9 and
everything works perfect.
Now I am testing SM-1.4.2 with avelsieve 0.9.6 before I set this in
production and I have a big problem with avelsieve.
When I open avelsieve, it gets my filters (created with
SM-1.2.11/avelsieve0.
Hello
I am testing SM-1.4.2 and I can not make it work with PHP-4.3.3.
It works without problems with PHP-4.2.3 although they are compiled with
the same options/compiler(gcc version 3.2.2 20030222)/apache(1.3.28) and
the installation of SM is the same.
I get this error message:
-
Hello
I have installed this plugin but when I try to use it I get an error
message from the imap server:
ERROR : Bad or malformed request.
Query: STORE 348 +FLAGS (\Archived)
Server responded: Invalid system flag in Store command
I use cyrus. Any ideas to fix this?
--
With regards
Rafael Martin
Hello
I have a server running SM-1.2.11 with avelsieve version 0.9 and
everything works perfect.
Now I am testing SM-1.4.2 with avelsieve 0.9.6 before I set this in
production and I have a big problem with avelsieve.
When I open avelsieve, it gets my filters (created with
SM-1.2.11/avelsieve0.
Hello
I am using SQ-1.2.11 and I have problems with some characters in the
Subject header.
- If I send an email whit this subject: &!"#£$%/()=?_;:& from SQ it
shows like this: &!"#£$%/()=?_;:& when I read it in SQ.
- If I send an email whit this subject: &!"#£$%/()=?_;:& from another
client (f.
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 07:13, Court Sansom wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does anyone know if there is session-management functionality written into
> SquirrelMail that supports a load-balanced server cluster?
>
Not in SquirrelMail but you can get this functionality if you configure
PHP to use a database for
44 matches
Mail list logo
