Re: [SM-USERS] Sort by Threads rationale

2009-06-18 Thread Peter Mann
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:43:03AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > I'm using "thread-sort" in mutt, and some people I know use it in > their regular mailreader. On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:30:22PM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote: > Look for allow_thread_sort and allow_server_sort. We use multilogin > plu

Re: [SM-USERS] vlogin plugin problem with SquirrelMail 1.4.6 [solved]

2006-02-28 Thread Peter Mann
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:49:42PM +, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 19:44, Peter Mann wrote: > > oh .. i forgot multilogin plugin ... now it seems ok > > I'm not using multilogin, and it's in fact completely unecessary for using > multip

Re: [SM-USERS] vlogin plugin problem with SquirrelMail 1.4.6 [solved]

2006-02-28 Thread Peter Mann
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:59:34PM +0100, Peter Mann wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:56:46PM +, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:35, Peter Mann wrote: > > > maybe it's problem, because of vlogin dependency on compatibility plugin >

Re: [SM-USERS] vlogin plugin problem with SquirrelMail 1.4.6

2006-02-28 Thread Peter Mann
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:56:46PM +, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:35, Peter Mann wrote: > > maybe it's problem, because of vlogin dependency on compatibility plugin > > > > can you help me? > > vlogin+compatibility+1.4.6 works f

[SM-USERS] vlogin plugin problem with SquirrelMail 1.4.6

2006-02-28 Thread Peter Mann
Heyaaa!!! i have problem with vlogin plugin after updating my webmail to SM 1.4.6 i found this notice in changelog http://www.squirrelmail.org/changelog.php: - Solved function conflict between compatibility and info plugins. maybe it's problem, because of vlogin dependency on compatibility plug

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachment size

2002-12-03 Thread Peter Mann
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:26:40PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm using Redhat 8.0, apache 2.0.x, php 4 to run squirrelmail. I'm > having problems with > 512K attachment. The error message on the browser > is > > Request Entity Too Large > The requested resource > /src/compose.php > does no

Re: [SM-USERS] attachment size problem

2002-11-26 Thread Peter Mann
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:14:54PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > sm 1.2.9 , php 4.2.2 and apache 2.0.43 on RedHat linux 8.0 > Can't send attachments over 500k . Php parameters > should be ok: (post_max_size = 8M, upload_max_filesize = 8M,memory_limit = > 16M) where is real error? how MTA are

Re: [SM-USERS] Attach size problems with Squirrel

2002-11-26 Thread Peter Mann
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:36:45AM +0100, Alberto Picón Couselo wrote: > Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted (tried to > allocate 9097 bytes) in > /usr/local/httpd/htdocs/correo/functions/imap_general.php on line 99 > > How can I increase the memory on the server reserved f

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail - debian security

2002-11-11 Thread Peter Mann
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 03:30:41AM -0600, David Bell wrote: > DSA 191-2 was just released to fix this problem. :) i know, but is that solution right? causes no vulnerability? > > this solves my problem: > > > > /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/options.php: > > > > 113c113 > > < $optpage = 'SMOPT

[SM-USERS] squirrelmail - debian security

2002-11-10 Thread Peter Mann
Heyaaa!!! i have problem with squirrelmail after debian security upgrade (Debian Security Advisory DSA 191-1) squirrelmail (1:1.2.6-1.1) stable-security; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team * Backport security fixes from upstream version 1.2.8, including XSS protect