Hello,
I am configuring a postfix server to add a DKIM signature
to all the outgoing message it receives from authorized
remote users on port 587 with dkimproxy. To do this,
I am doing exactly what is written here:
http://jason.long.name/dkimproxy/postfix-outbound-howto.html
At the same time, I n
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 00:55:55 AM -0400, Ian Evans
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Just wanted to quickly update this issue:
>
> 1) Email sent from our domain to hotmail.com IS delivered if sent via
> Outlook or Thunderbird
> 2) Email sent from our domain to hotmail.com IS delivered if sent via a
> s
On Tue, May 01, 2007 12:02:34 PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> To reduce resources consumed and the risks of vulnerabilities, make
> sure that you disable as many modules as possible. In debian's
> apache2, you can see which modules are enabled by looking in
> /etc/apach
Hello,
Apache and PHP are very powerful and flexible tools. I have the
_feeling_ that the way they are built and configured in the standard
rpm, deb or tgz packages of most Gnu/Linux distributions is an
overkill, or a potential security hole, for a system which must only
run SMTP/IMAP servers and
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 22:48:20 PM -0800, Paul Lesniewski
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Actually, I *did* understand it and acknowledge it, _and_ then I
> > said it was no excuse. No need to insist on this.
>
> I insist because although it might not be an excuse, it IS a factor
> that should be gi
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 00:59:34 AM -0800, Paul Lesniewski
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> No maybe not, but everyone like yourself who has jumped on this so
> hard is being very unfair in not understanding or acknowledging that
> the request was inappropriately sent...
Actually, I *did* understand it
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 17:17:02 PM -0800, Paul Lesniewski
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The point is, I think, that this person crossed the line between
> asking for help in the right place and the wrong place.
This is no excuse at all (as it was already said) to react in _that_
manner.
>...
> The
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 11:58:05 AM -0800, Dean Blackburn ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Looking at this thread, and then the last paragraph of the wiki
> page, I just have to shake my head...
>
> "Last, but not least, contact the SquirrelMail Project Team, which
> can give you advice for free. Please
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 09:03:04 AM +, Tomas Kuliavas
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If you want to mess with mailbox information without using IMAP
> server, you are talking on wrong list. SquirrelMail is IMAP
> client. It does not care about mailbox naming and format used
> internally by IMAP ser
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 21:52:04 PM +0200, Tomas Kuliavas ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> In correct listing INBOX.test_1 and INBOX.test_2 should be listed between
> INBOX and Drafts. In SquirrelMail 1.4.9a they are listed after Trash. See
> 1353394 bug tracker.
>
> Patch attached. It can be applied i
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 20:17:27 PM +, Tomas Kuliavas
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If you use Fedora/RHEL/Centos SquirrelMail rpm, it overrides some
> configuration variables in /etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php.
The only command in that file on my server is:
$default_folder_prefix
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 21:44:56 PM +0200, Tomas Kuliavas
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 2) which parameters must be changed and how in dovecot and/or
> >squirrelmail (or any IMAP client in my home PC) so that folders are
> >recognized and displayed as I wish?
>
> http://www.squirrelmail.org
Hello,
I am running dovecot 1.0-0_34.rc15 and squirrelmail 1.4.8-2 on a
Centos 4 server. Right now all messages are delivered to maildir
/var/mail/vhosts/virtual_mail_root/, which has its cur, tmp, new
subdirectories.
I need to (re) configure postfix, dovecot and squirrelmail so that
email is fil
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 09:50:51 AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > In other words, I think I have understood your explanation below,
> > but can it work /is it doable/necessary when postfix+dovecot+SM
> > are on one machine and fetchmail only on another?
> I think it's possi
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 15:48:13 PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > Just one question: do these extra folders need to follow some
> > special naming/format convention to be seen immediately the next
> > time I log into squirrelmail?
>
> Just create folder im SM, install server
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 16:25:28 PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> That's what procmail may do. Sort em into different physically
> existing folders (you've to create them in your IMAP server)
OK, I'll do it like that, since I can simply patch and upload, just
once, the releva
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 22:24:32 PM +0200, io ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> what I don't get is: why/how does this plugin "support" procmail and
> maildrop? Does this mean that the exact flow, is:
>
> 1) user logs into squirrelmail, which
> 2) runs serversidefilter, which
> 3) runs procmail, which so
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 10:59:53 AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I think you don't need such a configuration. We use fetchmail to
> collect mails from a couple of sources. Fetchmail is able to forward
> the messages to any local mail receipient. This means: Fetchmail
> gets t
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 16:39:01 PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> What do you want to do? There is no need for avelsieve if you want
> to do message filtering.
I have postfix already delivering all email for several virtual users
([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) to _one
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 17:16:22 PM -0700, Freddie Cash
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If all you need is a SIEVE daemon and a nicely intergrated ruleset
> creator/manager, then activate the timsieved that comes with Cyrus
> IMAP, and install the AvelSieve plugin for SquirrelMail.
>
> Works like a char
20 matches
Mail list logo
