Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail 1.2.0

2003-08-20 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
s hard as other people ;) uw-imap is > fully rfc3501 (the IMAP rfc) compliant (it IS rfc3501 somehow ;) It is not > bad in performance if you don't use the unix mailbox storage backend, and > it's the only imap server I know of that supp

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail 1.2.0

2003-08-19 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
ed. Thank you for this suggestion. I'll upgrade right now. > - Paul Regards, Josep -- Josep L. Guallar-Esteve System and Network Administration --- This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com. Did you know that Dice has

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail 1.2.0

2003-08-18 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
ble version rather than in Development? > Thanks > Roger Price > 17 Aug 2003 Hi Roger, I strongly recommend you to use Squirrelmail 1.2.8. With the experiences in my site, Squirrelmail-1.4.1 is not there yet as it gave me some grief. Good luck! Josep -- Josep L. Guallar-Esteve

Re: [SM-USERS] What is this error? "ERROR : Bad or malformed request."

2003-08-11 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
On Thursday 07 August 2003 12:02 pm, you wrote: > Ce jour Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:59:17AM -0400, Josep L. Guallar-Esteve écrit : > > Hi, > > Since I moved to SM-1.4.1, a few of my users are getting errors like this > > one: > > ERROR: > > ERROR : Bad or ma

[SM-USERS] What is this error? "ERROR : Bad or malformed request."

2003-08-08 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
This error shows up right after the user logs ininstead of the INBOX list of emails. Any idea? Regards, Josep -- Josep L. Guallar-Esteve System and Network Administration --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET

Re: [SM-USERS] [SM- 1.4.1] (New bug?) Problems with imap_general.php

2003-08-01 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
On Thursday 31 July 2003 06:46 pm, Nicolas Cartron wrote: > Josep L. Guallar-Esteve wrote : > > Since I updated Squirelmail to 1.4.1 , users with big inboxes/lots os > > messages get error messages similar to this: > > Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 byte

[SM-USERS] [SM- 1.4.1] (New bug?) Problems with imap_general.php

2003-07-31 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
eral); 245 foreach ($aLiteral as $line) { 246$fetch_data[] = $line ."\n"; 247 } Has this part changed since 1.2.8? Have I uncovered a bug? Regards, Josep -- Josep L. Guallar-Esteve System and Ne

Re: [SM-USERS] Upgrade SquirrelMail to from 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

2003-07-31 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > -- > squirrelmail-users mailing list > List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 > List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users -- Josep L. Gual

[SM-USERS] Should I upgrade? (1.2.8 - 1.4.1): slowness and troubles with redirect.php

2003-07-17 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
s (something like 0.05, 0.06, 0.08) The file exists (/var/www/html/squirrelmail/src/redirect.php) and looks identical to the one from the tar file where I got my SM 1.2.8. Will 1.4.1. help me here? IS something that I'm missing and that is killing my SM? Thank you in advance for any help,