Re: [SM-USERS] Trouble with Port 443 after Upgrade to 1.4.14-1

2009-01-05 Thread Jim Duda
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > That's a very risky bet. All the software in the equation - from the > browser to the web server to SquirrelMail all typically assume 443 == > SSL. It is possible to use non-SSL connections on port 443, but it's > always going to introduce a higher probability that pro

Re: [SM-USERS] Trouble with Port 443 after Upgrade to 1.4.14-1

2009-01-04 Thread Jim Duda
Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> I installed the SVN version as you requested. >> The banner displays as: >> >> SquirrelMail version 1.4.17 [SVN] > > Looks like the script that generates snapshots stalled out in > December. Too bad. I'll have to get with the team on that one. So > for now, you'd

Re: [SM-USERS] Trouble with Port 443 after Upgrade to 1.4.14-1

2009-01-02 Thread Jim Duda
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Thanks for the very thorough posting. The behavior you explain is > typical of a situation where the browser doesn't have the cookie > needed to re-athenticate when redirecting to webmail.php. You say > your browser is accepting them, but perhaps there is an issue with t

[SM-USERS] Trouble with Port 443 after Upgrade to 1.4.14-1

2009-01-02 Thread Jim Duda
A recent upgrade to 1.4.14-1.fc9 appears to result in an issue with login. After login, I'm immediately redirected to the redirect page. I get "you must be logged in to access this page". I believe the actual login is working. If I use an invalid login/password, then I get the "invalid login pas