n an athlon-xp with only 256 mb or ram (dovecot as well). SM had
no problem at all with that (though of course, the performance wasn't
all the best in such old hardware, but still usable and stable.
I've also experienced a noticeable difference when I updated to 1.5
to tell
El Jue, 29 de Enero de 2009, 18:55, Chris Hilts escribió:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>>
>> I've got another question though. Does cyrus-imap offer a database
>> backend?
>>
>>
> Not exactly. Can I ask what it is you're trying to solve using a
&
El Jue, 29 de Enero de 2009, 14:12, Chris Hilts escribió:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>>
>> Just a related question. So, can SM do client side threading
>> when using server side threading is not possible?
> Yep. If the server can't d
Hi again,
Just a related question. So, can SM do client side threading
when using server side threading is not possible? SM has no
problem sorting, but I'd like threading in some mailboxes if
possible.
If not I guess I will have to live without that for now.
--
Jesús Gue
e version doesn't
compile at all. It doesn't seem too mature either.
Thanks everyone for your kind support.
--
Jesús Guerrero
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell
Thanks for your response, Marc.
El Mie, 28 de Enero de 2009, 5:41, Marc Powell escribió:
>
> On Jan 27, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>
>> I forgot two little details:
>>
>>
>> The rest of folders work ok with server side sorting and
>>
under 50mb).
The offending folder which causes the bigest problem has the
most mails (+23,000 and growing).
I had a bigger one with +60,000 files which was slow as hell
but otherwise worked fine over a filesystem. So the database
might indeed be the issue.
--
Jesús Gue
I'd like to be able to use this couple, but if it's not possible
I would be willing -not happy, but willing- to migrate yet again
my mail to another database format if there's any other database
backend that will work better with squirrelmail.
So I'd also accept suggesti
