Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail and php-8.3

2024-01-25 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
Correction: Calendar Preferences is where the shared calendar option is set but none of the settings for shared calendars are displayed. Also, in calendar administration one cannot add users or calendars. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensiti

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail and php-8.3

2024-01-25 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Thu, January 25, 2024 15:40, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: > How can I debug why the shared calendar plugin does not function? This is > using SM 20240125 stable. > By renaming the calendar plugin directory and adding a soft link from calendar to shared_calendars I

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail and php-8.3

2024-01-25 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
How can I debug why the shared calendar plugin does not function? This is using SM 20240125 stable. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attachments nor

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail and php-8.3

2024-01-25 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Thu, January 25, 2024 14:38, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> I have gotten SM to run under php-8.3. However, following authentication >> I now >> see this in the message pane: >> >> ERROR: Bad or malformed request. >> Query: FETCH 1,3:5,7,10,12,18:19,28,50,119,121:123,125,127:128,132:135,138 >> (FLAG

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail and php-8.3

2024-01-25 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
Hello, I have gotten SM to run under php-8.3. However, following authentication I now see this in the message pane: ERROR: Bad or malformed request. Query: FETCH 1,3:5,7,10,12,18:19,28,50,119,121:123,125,127:128,132:135,138 (FLAGS UID RFC822.SIZE INTERNALDATE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (Date To Cc

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail and php-8.3

2024-01-25 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Thu, January 25, 2024 10:16, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: > > Fatal error: Uncaught ArgumentCountError: Too few arguments to function > simpleErrorHandler(), 4 passed in > /usr/local/www/squirrelmail/plugins/vlogin/functions.php on line 187 and > exactly 5 exp

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail and php-8.3

2024-01-25 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Tue, January 23, 2024 16:26, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > Your PHP isn't logging errors or you aren't looking at the right log file. > See: > > https://www.squirrelmail.org/docs/admin/admin-11.html#ss11.1 > > There was an additional php package required (mod_php83) that was not pulled in by the u

[SM-USERS] squirrelmail and php-8.3

2024-01-23 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I have to upgrade our webmail host to FreeBSd-13.2. This necessitates an upgrade to php as 7.3 is no longer supported. This in turn requires that squirrelmail be updated via freebsd's pkg system. The version of squirrelmail is unknow as the package manager reports: Version : 20230207 and the port

[SM-USERS] user/mailbox name case munging

2022-09-14 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
FreeBSD-12.3 & 13.1 SM-1.4.23 We have this situation. Our mailstore is a Cyrus-imapd-3.0.17 installation sitting behind a Postfix-3.7.2 MTA. Our webmail (Squirrelmail) host connects over ssl using the imap server host for authentication. We have encountered a situation where one of our staff log

[SM-USERS] missing mime part 2 application/ms winmail.dat base64missing

2022-09-01 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
FreeBSD 12.3-RELEASE-p2 SquirrelMail version 1.4.23 [SVN] (FreeBSD Ports pkg squirrelmail-php73 Version: 20211024) We are encountering a situation where some messages are arriving with the following bodystructure: Bodystructure Entity Content-TypeNameEncoding 1 text/plain

[SM-USERS] [SOLVED]: Firefox and Squirrelmail

2022-04-22 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Fri, April 22, 2022 11:22, James B. Byrne wrote: > > Access to SM through the firewall has been accomplished and users and see and > send email without difficulty. > > The problem that has surfaced is that Firefox now gives a > PR_CONNECT_RESET_ERROR whenever someone attempts to add a file mu

[SM-USERS] Firefox and Squirrelmail

2022-04-22 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
We had an equipment failure last night and I am trying to get various bits and pieces working. The hardware was the gateway router and the replacement has a different network stack. Consequently we are forced to finally correct an addressing error made many, many years ago. Access to SM through t

Re: [SM-USERS] PHP-8.0 SM shared calendars plugin

2022-04-21 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Thu, April 21, 2022 16:08, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Also check for things like SELinux context for the files and directories. > It looks to me like some security/permissioning mechanism on your new > server is preventing access to the files. > This is running a FreeBSD OS, there is no SELIN

Re: [SM-USERS] PHP-8.0 SM shared calendars plugin

2022-04-21 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Thu, April 21, 2022 15:08, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > If there are no typos in the config/config.php plugins[] entry for the > plugin, then the web server may not be able to load the plugin file(s). > Inspect the permissions for the plugin directory and files or manually > test with somethi

Re: [SM-USERS] shared_calendar plugin

2022-04-19 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Tue, April 19, 2022 16:53, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > Did you watch for PHP errors? There are no PHP entries in /var/log/messages that cannot be accounted for. > Do the calendar administrative options show up for users listed in > $cal_admins in the plugin configuration? No, they do not. >

[SM-USERS] shared_calendar plugin

2022-04-19 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
FreeBSD-13.0 SM 1.4.23 I have SM running from a FreeBSD binary package for PHP81. I likewise have installed the shared_calendar plugin and its dependencies from FreeBSD packages. I have configured SM to load this plugin. I also copied a data/config.php file from another installation of SM where

[SM-USERS] FreeBSD-13.0p11 - squirrelmail-20220414_0200-SVN.stable.tar.gz

2022-04-18 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I now have the current snapshot running on FreeBSD-13.0 under apache-2.4.53 connecting to cyrus imapd-3.0.17 running on a different host. This required adjusting the $data_dir and $attachment_dir paths to match those used by the FreeBSD port. I can connect and authenticate. The left-hand-side fo

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail-20220414_0200-SVN.stable.tar.gz

2022-04-18 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
The issue is resolved. The problem was that the incorrect version of mod_php was installed for Apache. Evidently the php81 pkg install does not check for this and the Apache24 package was installed prior to php81. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT tra

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail-20220414_0200-SVN.stable.tar.gz

2022-04-18 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Fri, April 15, 2022 04:26, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > On Thu, April 14, 2022 8:02 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: >> FreeBSD-13.0p11 >> php Version: 8.1.4_3 >> >> I downloaded the most recent stable snapshot given above. I installed and

[SM-USERS] squirrelmail-20220414_0200-SVN.stable.tar.gz

2022-04-14 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
FreeBSD-13.0p11 php Version: 8.1.4_3 I downloaded the most recent stable snapshot given above. I installed and configured it. I enabled src/configtest.php. When I visit this url I obtain this error: [Thu Apr 14 15:55:50.272309 2022] [php:error] [pid 43532] [client 216.185.71.41:40396] PHP Fat

[SM-USERS] PHP-8.0 SM plugins (quicksave) (calander file backend)

2022-04-14 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
OS FreeBSD-13.0 I am migrating SM from one host to another. The new host runs php80. The old runs php73. I am using the FreeBSD port for SM on FreeBSD-13.0. There is a plugin that I installed many years ago called quicksave. I cannot find this in the prepackaged SM plugin ports. The version I

Re: [SM-USERS] Adding users to shared calendars

2021-12-06 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Mon, December 6, 2021 16:14, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > On Mon, December 6, 2021 4:00 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users > wrote: >> Can someone please tell me where I can find the share calendar >> administrative interface? > > If it's

[SM-USERS] Adding users to shared calendars

2021-12-06 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
This is due to a failing memory, and compounded by a somewhat obscure SM configuration interface. How does one add and remove users from shared calendars? I have done this in the past. And I recall the the method was located in some out of the way place. But I cannot recall where that is. Can

Re: [SM-USERS] SM and PHP8

2021-10-24 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Sun, October 24, 2021 13:42, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > You can't look at the code running on your own server? > ./functions/strings.php:$version = '1.4.23 [SVN]'; -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted

Re: [SM-USERS] SM and PHP8

2021-10-24 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Sun, October 24, 2021 12:28, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > On Sun, October 24, 2021 4:11 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users > wrote: >> I am testing a FreeBSD package for squirrelmail built for PHP8 > > You need to indicate what version > This is all th

[SM-USERS] SM and PHP8

2021-10-24 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I am testing a FreeBSD package for squirrelmail built for PHP8. I get this error when I connect to the test server: [Sun Oct 24 12:01:56.267457 2021] [php:error] [pid 13492] [client 216.185.71.41:15698] PHP Fatal error: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is no longer support

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail CVE-2020-14933

2021-10-18 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Fri, October 15, 2021 14:37, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > This was on my radar, but given your situation, I went ahead and contacted > both NIST and MITRE just now. If you have the FreeBSD maintainer's > contact info, I can work with that person too, but I don't understand what > you need fro

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail CVE-2020-14933

2021-10-15 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Fri, October 15, 2021 10:36, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: > n Thu, October 14, 2021 18:09, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> On Thu, October 14, 2021 7:28 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users >> wrote: >>> See: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail CVE-2020-14933

2021-10-15 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Fri, October 15, 2021 10:36, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: > n Thu, October 14, 2021 18:09, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> On Thu, October 14, 2021 7:28 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users >> wrote: >>> See: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-

Re: [SM-USERS] squirrelmail CVE-2020-14933

2021-10-15 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
n Thu, October 14, 2021 18:09, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Thu, October 14, 2021 7:28 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users > wrote: >> See: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-14933#match-5399106 >> >> Has this been patched? > > There is no vulnerabili

[SM-USERS] squirrelmail CVE-2020-14933

2021-10-14 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
See: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-14933#match-5399106 Has this been patched? -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Unencrypted messages have no legal claim to privacy Do NOT open attachments nor follow link

Re: [SM-USERS] I keep getting logged out of webmail

2021-05-12 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Wed, May 12, 2021 01:51, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Also as previously suggested, please indicate what you see on screen and > where -- is the folder list showing a "you must be logged in" error? What > happens if you right-click that frame and select H and then R? > I have pinned a note to

Re: [SM-USERS] I keep getting logged out of webmail

2021-05-12 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Wed, May 12, 2021 00:04, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > So if your change for some reason helps the problem, that'd be great to > know, but it may not change what we need to do (or have already done) on > our end. > The change I made to the samesite setting did not make a difference. I still g

Re: [SM-USERS] I keep getting logged out of webmail

2021-05-11 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I have stumbled across these which appear to me to be related to the issue I brought to your attention: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2020/08/changes-to-samesite-cookie-behavior/ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1617609 I have added our SM web address to the 'network.cookie.sameSite.laxB

Re: [SM-USERS] I keep getting logged out of webmail

2021-05-10 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Mon, May 10, 2021 12:28, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Somewhere the reply-to address for the list got butchered. Latest reply > from me: > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 3:09 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> What version of SM are you using? >> >> SquirrelMail version 1.4.23 [SVN] >> >>> When was the date

Re: [SM-USERS] I keep getting logged out of webmail

2021-05-07 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Fri, May 7, 2021 06:35, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 6:30 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: >> It has happened several time since but I neglected to run the inspector >> before >> logging on to SM. Until today. This is what I found: >> >> Cookie �SQMSESSID� will be soon reje

Re: [SM-USERS] I keep getting logged out of webmail

2021-05-06 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cookie/SameSite On Tue, May 4, 2021 20:16, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > On Mon, May 3, 2021 5:04 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: >> I believe this to be a problem with

Re: [SM-USERS] ***Spam***Re: I keep getting logged out of webmail

2021-05-05 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Wed, May 5, 2021 03:43, Markus Robert Kessler wrote: > Hi James, hi Paul, > > maybe this is a cookie-problem within firefox. > > Could you please verify that the squirrelmail cookie is there and is valid > when you are logged out? I will check the browser's cookie cache the next time it happ

[SM-USERS] I keep getting logged out of webmail

2021-05-04 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I believe this to be a problem with Firefox (85.0.2 FreeBSD-12.2) and not with squirrelmail; for the simple reason that SM has not been updated while FF has and the behaviour only recently became evident. However, I would like to know what is going on with FF and how to turn it off. If anyone here

Re: [SM-USERS] viewing message .eml attachment.

2021-03-19 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Fri, March 19, 2021 02:51, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > The person or mailer software that sent it munged the original and that's > a problem on their side. > > You can just plug in the message to a base64 decoder and get the contents. > The part you included is the beginning of a HTML format

Re: [SM-USERS] viewing message .eml attachment.

2021-03-18 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Thu, March 18, 2021 02:00, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > On Wed, March 17, 2021 4:48 pm, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: >> Is there a plugin to handle these things? I have a message encapsulated >> in this format and I cannot extract the contents. U

[SM-USERS] viewing message .eml attachment.

2021-03-17 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
Is there a plugin to handle these things? I have a message encapsulated in this format and I cannot extract the contents. Usually I download and extract using the tnef utility, but this time it says that 'Seems not to be a TNEF file'. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel **

Re: [SM-USERS] Another HTML email oddity

2020-06-23 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Tue, June 23, 2020 13:25, Zsolt Udvari wrote: > James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users ezt írta: >> The version we have is SquirrelMail version 1.4.23 [SVN] which is >> packaged by >> the port maintainer at FreeBSD. > I'm the maintainer the package. > The v

Re: [SM-USERS] ***Spam***Re: Another HTML email oddity

2020-06-23 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
The version we have is SquirrelMail version 1.4.23 [SVN] which is packaged by the port maintainer at FreeBSD. This problem does not occur for every html message. Most show the html display button and can be switched to the html view. But some do not. Thank you for your attention to the matter.

[SM-USERS] Another HTML email oddity

2020-06-22 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I receive messages from e-bay whose message details contain this: From: eBay To: xx Message-ID: <0A16D6F3-D1774F7F39A-0172B6CD7A67-01B86EE5@starship> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=9C=85_Order_Confirmed:_2-3_Days_Delivery_Ma...?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed

Re: [SM-USERS] Inline css renders squiremail headers illegible

2020-06-19 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Fri, June 19, 2020 12:34, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > Note: James sent me a copy offlist of such an offending message. Assuming > version 1.4.23, the problem described does not exist in more recent > versions of SquirrelMail (after my fix in January). If you cannot > upgrade, try grabbing

Re: [SM-USERS] ***Spam***Re: Inline css renders squiremail headers illegible

2020-06-18 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Wed, June 17, 2020 23:12, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Also, please make sure you're running a 1.4.23 snapshot newer than > 2020-01-06 which contains a fix I made for things like this. If it's > still broken, note that v1.5.2 uses an iframe to try and better isolate > css for the message body.

[SM-USERS] Inline css renders squiremail headers illegible

2020-06-17 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I do not know how to deal with this in Squirrelmail. We have correspondents sending html format email with this at the top: Notification Template body { background-color: #ff; font-size: 13px; } img { border:0; } ta

[SM-USERS] fatal error running SM with php74 on FreeBSD-12.1

2020-01-29 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
We are setting up a test SM environment and cannot get past this error when running configtest.php: Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function session_set_cookie_params() in /usr/local/www/squirrelmail/functions/global.php:476 Stack trace: #0 /usr/local/www/squirrelmail/functions/gl

[SM-USERS] squirrelmail.org website off-line?

2020-01-23 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I cannot seem to raise https://squirrelmail.org. Is this just my problem or a universal outage? -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne

[SM-USERS] SM missing aspell?

2019-05-21 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
Our SM users are receiving this message: > SquirrelSpell is misconfigured. > I tried to execute '/usr/local/bin/aspell -a', but it returned: > > sh: /usr/local/bin/aspell: not found > > SquirrelSpell v0.3.8 However on the Squirrelmail host we see this: # which aspell /usr/local/bin/aspell # /

[SM-USERS] Plugins - TNEF Decoder

2019-04-01 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
We recently moved our SM installation and at that time upgraded the TNEF viewer plugin to tnef_decoder-1.0-1.4.0.tar.gz from attachment_tnef-0.7-1.4.0.hll.tar.gz. However, we can no longer see winmail.dat attachments with the new version of this plugin. We have followed the instructions in the new

[SM-USERS] favicon and vlogin plugin

2019-03-28 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
SquirrelMail version 1.4.23 [SVN] vlogin-3.10.2-1.2.7 We just moved our SM installation to a new host. We took this opportunity to update some of the plugins that we use. One of these is vlogin. The new vlogin plugin works fine but we cannot seem to configure it such that the site favicon stays

[SM-USERS] [SOLVED]: Squirrelmail with php-7.3 on FreeBSD-12.0p3

2019-03-26 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Tue, March 26, 2019 12:07, James B. Byrne wrote: > We have a working Squirrelmail (SM) install running with php-5.6 on > FreeBSD-11.9p2. I am trying to install SM for php-7.3 on > FreeBSD-12.0p3. The httpd server is Apache-2.4. After running > conf.pl when I run configtest.php in Firefox t

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail with php-7.3 on FreeBSD-12.0p3

2019-03-26 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
We have a working Squirrelmail (SM) install running with php-5.6 on FreeBSD-11.9p2. I am trying to install SM for php-7.3 on FreeBSD-12.0p3. The httpd server is Apache-2.4. After running conf.pl when I run configtest.php in Firefox then I see this. I believe that this is likely a configuration

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail reports IMAP dropped connection when searching mailboxes

2019-01-11 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I do not believe that this problem is due to squirrelmail (SM) but I need to check out every possibility. On January 8 both SM and cyrus_imapd (CI) were updated on their respective hosts though the 'pkg upgrade' process of FreeBSD-11.2. Since that time we have noted a marked increase in the numbe

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail is too security conscious

2018-11-14 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Wed, November 14, 2018 00:07, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > On 2018年10月31日 10:06, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users > wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, October 31, 2018 11:45, James B. Byrne via >> squirrelmail-users >> wrote: >>> Thi

[SM-USERS] [SOLVED] Squirrelmail is too security conscious

2018-11-01 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Wed, October 31, 2018 15:26, Rich Hall wrote: > Hmm.. possibly a web server configuration with session keys timing > out? > Yes. That appears to be the source of the problem. The default httpd.conf for FreeBSD contains this: #LoadModule session_module libexec/apache24/mod_session.so #Loa

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail is too security conscious

2018-10-31 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
These are the values that the code is using when the error is trigerred $timestamp 1540839336 Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:00:19 PM GMT-04:00 DST $old_token_date 1540839512 Your time zone: Monday, October 29, 2018 2:58:32 PM GMT-04:00 DST $now 1541012312 Your time zone: Wednesday, October 31, 2

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail is too security conscious

2018-10-31 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Wed, October 31, 2018 13:17, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: > These are the two possibilities. It appears that the cookie is > expiring too quickly in the separate popup compose window. The main > SM page in the browser remains connected. > This is where the err

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail is too security conscious

2018-10-31 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
These are the two possibilities. It appears that the cookie is expiring too quickly in the separate popup compose window. The main SM page in the browser remains connected. /usr/local/www/squirrelmail/plugins/compatibility/includes/1.5.2/global.php // reject tokens that are too old // i

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail is too security conscious

2018-10-31 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Wed, October 31, 2018 11:45, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: > This is ridiculous. I cannot compose a message of any reasonable > length in a separate window in SM without getting a security error > when I try and send. > > SquirrelMail version 1.4.23

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail is too security conscious

2018-10-31 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Wed, October 31, 2018 12:10, Zsolt Udvari wrote: > What version of php do you use? Please be aware to install the correct > version of > squirrelmail (please note the -php* postfixes). > > On Wed, October 31, 2018 11:53, James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users wrote: > We

[SM-USERS] (no subject)

2018-10-31 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Wed, October 31, 2018 11:56, Rich Hall wrote: > I believe the issue is with your mailer settings and not SM.. What mailer settings? Where? The Postfix and IMAP services have not been altered at all. The only change that has happened is that we moved our SM install from CentOS-6 to FreeBSD-

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail is too security conscious

2018-10-31 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
We are using FreeBSD-11.2p4 as the SM web service host. That host has php56-5.6.38 installed The client browser is FireFox 63.0esr (64 bit) -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail is too security conscious

2018-10-31 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
This is ridiculous. I cannot compose a message of any reasonable length in a separate window in SM without getting a security error when I try and send. SquirrelMail version 1.4.23 [SVN] By the SquirrelMail Project Team ERROR The current page request appears to have originated from an untrusted s

[SM-USERS] vlogin plugin configuration issue

2018-10-30 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
We recently moved from SM-1.4.22 (CentOS-6.9) to SM-1.4.23 (FreeBSD-11.2p4). One of the plugins that we use is vlogin. We configured the new install vlogin data/config.php file to match the changes that we have configured in the old location. However, I must have missed something. In the vlogi

Re: [SM-USERS] ListServ MLM refuses Squirrelmail plain text messages

2018-05-24 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Thu, May 24, 2018 14:40, James B. Byrne wrote: > > Starting this morning (2018-05-2) my Squirrelmail (SM) composed posts > to a Listserv mailing list service are being bounced back with this: > . . . > Does anyone have a clue as to what is happening and how it is > resolved? > The temporary fi

[SM-USERS] ListServ MLM refuses Squirrelmail plain text messages

2018-05-24 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
Starting this morning (2018-05-2) my Squirrelmail (SM) composed posts to a Listserv mailing list service are being bounced back with this: Reporting-MTA: dns;smtp.utc.edu Received-From-MTA: dns;NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com Arrival-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 09:16:56 -0400 Original-R

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem with folder display options in SM-1.4.23 on FreeBSD-11.1

2018-05-08 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Mon, May 7, 2018 11:52, Seth Randall wrote: > > Did you select Cyrus from option D in configure? It will set > options for your IMAP server type that might affect how the > folders are displayed. I had not bothered with that but in the spirit of adventure I did so after your suggestion. That

[SM-USERS] Problem with folder display options in SM-1.4.23 on FreeBSD-11.1

2018-05-07 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
FreeBSD-11.1 Cyrus-IMAP-3.0.5 Squirrelmail-1.4.23 Can someone tell me how to change the left hand frame in SM to display folders as: INBOX Folder1 sub11 sub12 Folder2 sub21 sub22 sub221 sub23 . . . instead of INBOX Folder1 Folder1/sub11 Folder1/sub12 Folder2 Folder2/sub21 Folder2/

[SM-USERS] Problem with folder display options in SM-1.4.23 on FreeBSD-11.1

2018-05-04 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I sent this to the list before and have had no reply. I am running SM-1.4.23 under Apache-2.4 on FreeBSD-11.1. I am connecting to a Cyrus-IMAP-3.0.5 service also running on FreeBSD-11.1. I cannot get that SM instance to display mail folders in any other formate besides the Delimited format where

[SM-USERS] Cyrus-IMAP-3.0.5 and Squirrelmai-1.4.23 folder display issue

2018-05-02 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
I am now able to connect SM to both the old and the new IMAP services without difficulty. However, on the new IMAP server I cannot seem to get SM to display subscribed folders as an indented list. This is what the SM page source says: Selection List Style: Long: "Folder.Subfolder" Indented: "

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem with STARTTLS

2018-04-30 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Mon, April 30, 2018 13:22, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate >> chain) > > That's likely your problem - SquirrelMail needs the homebrewed CA or > you need to adjust the verify options. > That message is completely misleading. Every C

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem with STARTTLS

2018-04-30 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
On Sat, April 28, 2018 14:45, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > Off the top of my head, I'd suggest trying to write a small POC > script to see if you can make the connection without any other > code in the way. But it does seem clear that the IMAP server does > not in fact have the CA's certificate, de

[SM-USERS] Problem with STARTTLS

2018-04-26 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
We have a currently running Squirremail (1.4.22-5.el6) (SM) running on Apache-2.2.15 all hosted on a CentOS-6.9 x64 box. It connects via TLS (:993) to a Cyrus_IMAP-2.3.16 service running on a different CentOS-6.9 x64 host. Both services employ X509 certificates issued by our own CA. All of the va

[SM-USERS] Tiny, tiny printing from SM-1.4.22 CentOS-6

2017-12-06 Thread James B. Byrne via squirrelmail-users
Recently all of our users began to experience the problem of invisibly tiny printing when printing messages from the printable message window of SM. This occurs when at least one header is excessively long. Is there a way, short of rewriting all the css files myself, of configuring SM to simply w