Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail & PHP 7 (Ubuntu 16.04)

2016-09-17 Thread David C. Rankin
so for all webapps to transition to php7 the changes are fairly substantial. I don't know what the schedule is for squirrelmail or how far along it is, others will have to chime in. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- -

[SM-USERS] What is needed to make sure the squirrel is ready for PHP 7?

2016-03-23 Thread David C. Rankin
ring complaints about an encoding not being set. Do I need to set encoding to UTF-8 or set something to make mbstring happy? The only mbstring setting I have in php.ini is: mbstring.func_overload = 7 (which is a groupware requirement) Is there something I should try to resolve these messages on m

Re: [SM-USERS] different version of squirrelmail - different behavior when log-in with wrong username/password

2015-09-09 Thread David C. Rankin
e. fail2ban itself should be capable of working with either -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tool

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS

2015-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
tificates. I don't know if it will help with your setup, but it does help keep you from being locked into a specific cert CN. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- - squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelin

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
tes of refreshing required to get on top of the issue again. I can report that after stumbling though the exercise, squirrelmail is happily gathering nuts again. Great package. Keep up the great work! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS

2015-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
ol imap { mail_max_userip_connections = 30 } I've been bitten by this more than once -- I don't have excess hair to pull out anymore... -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- - squirrelmail-users m

Re: [SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-15 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/14/2015 11:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, after you look into this, if this was the sole cause, you may want > to > drop a Install/Upgrade note regarding php 5.6 and the change required in > server > settings. > > (even better, it may be worth adding a chec

[SM-USERS] [SOLVED sort of] was Re: svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-14 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/14/2015 08:00 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 06/14/2015 07:05 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >> Checking outgoing mail service >>SMTP server OK (220 phoinix.rlfpllc.com ESMTP Postfix) >> >> I think you have nailed the issue as a 'ca' prob

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-14 Thread David C. Rankin
managing great software. If that means it can only happen every 48 hours or so, then that's just they way it works. (see my next post) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- - squirrelmail-users mailing list Posti

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-14 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/14/2015 07:05 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Checking outgoing mail service > SMTP server OK (220 phoinix.rlfpllc.com ESMTP Postfix) > > I think you have nailed the issue as a 'ca' problem which makes sense with > the error: 'tlsv1 alert unknown ca

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-14 Thread David C. Rankin
hink you have nailed the issue as a 'ca' problem which makes sense with the error: 'tlsv1 alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48'. Let me know when you have a chance to look into this. I'm happy to do the digging. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. ---

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-13 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/13/2015 12:11 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 06/12/2015 07:02 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >> Paul, >> >> After 1.5.2 update to svn 14501, I can no longer log in to >> squirrelmail. I >> have used the same squirrelmail setup for at least the last

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-12 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/12/2015 07:02 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > After 1.5.2 update to svn 14501, I can no longer log in to squirrelmail. I > have used the same squirrelmail setup for at least the last 6-8 years. The > All operation through Thunderbird (sending/receiving) work

Re: [SM-USERS] What's wrong in Squirrelmail OpenSuse 13.2?

2015-06-12 Thread David C. Rankin
il.org install and it is response to your request here. We'll work it under the other thread. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- - squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/po

[SM-USERS] svn 14501 - TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error: ... alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48

2015-06-12 Thread David C. Rankin
48 So something in squirrelmail isn't handling the TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() quite like it used to. Let me know what else I can do or test to help isolate the problem. I'd like to get me squirrelmail install back up and running or I will have a lot of upset users in the mor

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-06-20 Thread David C. Rankin
at I only reported to the list to help identify the lines of code in sqmail I had to change to suppress the messages with the new php. Thanks again. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclu

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-06-19 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/15/2012 06:20 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > >I apologize if this list gets two copies of this, but I didn't see the > first > come through. Could the squirrelmail code be setting E_ALL and causing this > problem? I don't see this issue with my o

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-06-15 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/15/2012 11:42 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 06/15/2012 11:26 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > >> >> I'll see if there are any bug reports open with php or Arch on the issue. >> If you can think of anything else, please let me know. Thanks for your >

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-06-15 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/15/2012 11:26 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > I'll see if there are any bug reports open with php or Arch on the issue. > If you can think of anything else, please let me know. Thanks for your > continued work on squirrelmail! > Paul, Take a look at: https://bug

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-06-15 Thread David C. Rankin
On 05/11/2012 11:57 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 05/10/2012 10:19 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: >> Thanks, we are aware of this. We do not recommend E_STRICT error reporting. > > Thanks Paul -- that is just the default set by Archlinux with its php install. > I'll look in

[SM-USERS] Unable to forward/reply complete mails from word/outlook 2012 (new MS non-compliance?)

2012-06-14 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul, Tomas, I have an issue that started a month or so ago with users not being able to reply to or forward the complete conversations in 1.5.2 when the message sent is from outlook 2012. I don't know if this is just the latest outlook non-standard compliance showing up as more people use the l

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-05-11 Thread David C. Rankin
On 05/10/2012 10:19 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote: > Thanks, we are aware of this. We do not recommend E_STRICT error reporting. Thanks Paul -- that is just the default set by Archlinux with its php install. I'll look into changing the setting. -- David C. Rankin,

Re: [SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-05-10 Thread David C. Rankin
On 05/10/2012 02:32 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, all, > > Update today from php 5.3.12 -> 5.4.3 caused a new SquirrelMail notice at > the bottom of the message: > > Category: PHP > Message: Non-static method Message::parseStructure() should not be ca

[SM-USERS] php update 5.3 -> 5.4; parseStructure() should not be called statically

2012-05-10 Thread David C. Rankin
ure() parseBodyStructure() or something similar. Let me know if I can send anything else, but the notice looks fairly straightforward. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply/Reply All address incorrect after svn update on 1/6/12 (version 14257:14264M)

2012-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
Thank you Paul! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops.

Re: [SM-USERS] access from intranet

2012-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
then of course you will need both forward and reverse zone entries for the squirrelmail server. Bottom line, your boxes on the LAN can't find your squirrelmail server, but that has nothing to do with squirrelmail... P.S. the domain portion of your e-mail address may be

[SM-USERS] Reply/Reply All address incorrect after svn update on 1/6/12 (version 14257:14264M)

2012-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
What can I send you that would help sort this out? What else can I check? I'm working on getting a copy of one of the emails that is exhibiting this behavior, but I haven't gotten one yet this morning. I welcome all thoughts on this matter. Is anybody else seeing this? -- David C. Ranki

[SM-USERS] mbstring.func_overload = 7 causes multiple warnings from , , /template/Template.class.php & general_util.php

2010-03-09 Thread David C. Rankin
l.php LINE: 39 Category: PHP Message:mb_stristr() [http://www.php.net/function.mb-stristr]: Unknown encoding "(null)" FILE: /srv/http/htdocs/squirrelmail/functions/template/general_util.php LINE: 41 Category: PHP Message:mb_stristr() [http://www.php.net/functio

Re: [SM-USERS] SM won't let users log on, but IMAP does

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 04:34:28 pm David C. Rankin wrote: > Sorry, I completely missed that part. Do you want me to repost my reply in > that thread? > Disregard, I see you took care of it.... -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoch

Re: [SM-USERS] SM won't let users log on, but IMAP does

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 01:21:53 am Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > David C. Rankin wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 02:55:27 pm Paul Lesniewski wrote: > > > > > >> It's been reported that 1.5.2 does this when using PHP 5.3. I have no > >> idea

Re: [SM-USERS] SM won't let users log on, but IMAP does

2009-10-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 02:40:58 pm Paul Lesniewski wrote: > I asked you to respond on the more appropriate thread. Please do that > next time. I will reply there. > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:53 PM, David C. Rankin > > wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 02:

Re: [SM-USERS] SM won't let users log on, but IMAP does

2009-10-20 Thread David C. Rankin
27;ll get that for you too. Also, I'm serious about the account. I worked with a number of opensource projects that way and never had a problem -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Na

Re: [SM-USERS] SM won't let users log on, but IMAP does

2009-10-20 Thread David C. Rankin
setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in /srv/www/htdocs/squirrelmail/src

[SM-USERS] Upgrade to PHP 5.3, sqmail 1.5.2 svn is stuck in a login loop.

2009-08-31 Thread David C. Rankin
have switched back to php 5.2.10 for now and all is fine. Let me know if you have anything you want me to send or try and test (patch, etc.) I have another box with php 5.3 on that I can load squirrelmail on for testing. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - FATAL ERROR: Data dir (/usr/local/share/sqmail/data/) does not exist!

2009-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 22:22:44 Chris Hilts wrote: > David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote: > > Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction > > in effect. File(/usr/local/share/sqmail/data) is not within the allowed > > path(s): (/srv/http/:/srv/www:/h

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - FATAL ERROR: Data dir (/usr/local/share/sqmail/data/) does not exist!

2009-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 18:19:02 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote: > Paul, > > This one is obviously simple, but it has caught me off-guard. This is > with > sqmail 1.5 svn Rev. 13786. The problem is sqmail can't access the data and > attach directories. Web server wr

[SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - FATAL ERROR: Data dir (/usr/local/share/sqmail/data/) does not exist!

2009-06-16 Thread David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
ridiculous here. Can you help a brother out? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com -- C

[SM-USERS] Effect of Dark Theme on Sqmail Skins/Interface

2009-06-07 Thread David C. Rankin
r the next time the color-scheme/layout is being revisited. If I have time to mess with the color definition, I'll post the results to the list for consideration as well. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936)

Re: [SM-USERS] TOOOO many emails

2009-04-27 Thread David C. Rankin
d include useful information for us to help you with, > there's nothing anyone can do for you. > This is the "Admin" account, Jeremy do you have root access? If so, and if as you say you don't need the mail, then just delete the mail spool (usually /var/spool/ma

[SM-USERS] Possible Bug with sqmail recognition of user 'http' instead of 'httpd'

2009-04-26 Thread David C. Rankin
an happy to do it. I can't explain why it runs fine on openSuSE with user/group wwwrun/www , but won't run on arch even with the data dir set to 0777 with user/group of http?? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoc

Re: [SM-USERS] Many notice messages on new install concerning mb_xyz [SOLVED]

2009-04-26 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > I have a new install of squirrelmail 1.5 svn on archlinux and accessing > it I > get a lot of notice messages concerning mb_. I know this is > something I'm screwing up, but I can't figure out where the mb_xyz setting is &

[SM-USERS] Many notice messages on new install concerning mb_xyz

2009-04-26 Thread David C. Rankin
template/general_util.php LINE: 41 Category: PHP Message:mb_stristr() [function.mb-stristr]: Unknown encoding "(null)" FILE: /srv/www/htdocs/squirrelmail/functions/template/general_util.php LINE: 45 -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacog

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - Updated to revision 13565 - signout redirect doesn't work? [SOLVED]

2009-04-19 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > I updated to the latest svn for 1.5 (revision 13565) and for some > reason, my > signout page no longer redirects to my home page and instead gives a 403 > error. > My config is: > > $signout_page = SM_PATH . 'conf

[SM-USERS] 1.5 svn - Updated to revision 13565 - signout redirect doesn't work?

2009-04-19 Thread David C. Rankin
eny,allow # Deny from all But, that made no difference. Any thoughts on what I should check next?? Thanks for your great work. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facs

Re: [SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM, David C. Rankin > wrote: >> David C. Rankin wrote: >>> Paul, >> >>> As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. >>> The >>> upper one

Re: [SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. > The > upper one with all of the other buttons, and then the lower one, standing > alone, under the edit window of the e-mail message. The upper one works

Re: [SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, > > THE PROBLEM > > As of rev. 13395, in the compose window, you have two 'send' buttons. > The > upper one with all of the other buttons, and then the lower one, standing > alone, under the edit window of the e-mail messag

[SM-USERS] The bottom 'send' button -- doesn't

2009-01-19 Thread David C. Rankin
t have the same behavior on-click. POOR MAN'S GUESS It looks like the lower button's function is swapped with the 'signature' function. Just thought I would pass it along. As always, I am more than happy to test a patch for you. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin,

Re: [SM-USERS] trunk svn revision 13367 - Can't download attachments

2008-12-18 Thread David C. Rankin
threv=13370 > Thanks Paul, It works fine now! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com ---

[SM-USERS] trunk svn revision 13367 - Can't download attachments

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Content-Type: application/pdf; name="php_IBM-Ajax-auto-Controls.pdf"\r\n \r\n Let me know what else I can send/post or do to help nail this problem down. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, P

Re: [SM-USERS] Trouble with attachment

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:23 PM, David C. Rankin > wrote: >> Paul Lesniewski wrote: >>> No one else has reported this issue, it works for the rest of us >>> apparently, so there is no reason to think that the code would >>> ma

Re: [SM-USERS] PDFs within squirrelmail

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
ort as 'icehen' and nothing.., I mean nothing, named beagle is ever allowed on my computer ;-) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. | openSoftware und SystemEntwicklung Rankin Law Firm, PLLC | Countdown for openSuSE 11.1 www.rankinlawfirm.com |

Re: [SM-USERS] trunk svn revision 13367 - Can't download attachments

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Paul, list: > > With the latest update of 1.5 svn to revision 13367, I can no longer > download attachments. Specifically, when trying to download or view > attachments, such as the pdf files shown in the screenshot: > > http://www.311

Re: [SM-USERS] Trouble with attachment

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
e my separate post with wireshark packets. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. | openSoftware und SystemEntwicklung Rankin Law Firm, PLLC | Countdown for openSuSE 11.1 www.rankinlawfirm.com |http://counter.opens

[SM-USERS] trunk svn revision 13367 - Can't download attachments

2008-12-17 Thread David C. Rankin
e\r\n Content-Type: application/pdf; name="php_IBM-Ajax-auto-Controls.pdf"\r\n \r\n Let me know what else I can send/post or do to help nail this problem down. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone:

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.5 svn rev. 13318 still current

2008-11-16 Thread David C. Rankin
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 14:05:00 Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:01 AM, David C. Rankin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Listmates, > > > >Just checking, is rev. 13318 still current for svn of 1.5? No > > problems, everyt

[SM-USERS] 1.5 svn rev. 13318 still current

2008-11-12 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, Just checking, is rev. 13318 still current for svn of 1.5? No problems, everything is great with squirrelmail, but it just seems that I haven't seen any recent updates. Maybe squirrelmail is now perfect? Thanks! -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLL

Re: [SM-USERS] SM "notice messages" in Addressbook ( undefined constant SMOPT_SIZE_NORMAL)

2008-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:19 PM, David C. Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul Lesniewski wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:45 PM, David C. Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Listmates, New install of SM 1.5.2 svn (revision 13268) on openSuSE 11.

Re: [SM-USERS] recent stable 1.5.x release?

2008-08-26 Thread David C. Rankin
running the latest without any problems. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com - This SF.Net em

Re: [SM-USERS] SM "notice messages" in Addressbook ( undefined constant SMOPT_SIZE_NORMAL)

2008-08-26 Thread David C. Rankin
xed. Excellent. Thank you. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com - This SF.Net email is sp

Re: [SM-USERS] SM "notice messages" in Addressbook ( undefined constant SMOPT_SIZE_NORMAL)

2008-08-25 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:19 PM, David C. Rankin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Paul Lesniewski wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:45 PM, David C. Rankin >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Listmates, >>&g

Re: [SM-USERS] SM "notice messages" in Addressbook ( undefined constant SMOPT_SIZE_NORMAL)

2008-08-25 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:45 PM, David C. Rankin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Listmates, >> >>New install of SM 1.5.2 svn (revision 13268) on openSuSE 11.0 i386 >> (php5-5.2.6-0.1, apache2-2.2.8-28.1) and I am getting a la

[SM-USERS] SM "notice messages" in Addressbook ( undefined constant SMOPT_SIZE_NORMAL)

2008-08-25 Thread David C. Rankin
f it? Thanks for any help you can give. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com - This SF.Ne

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug: Replies from subfolders not placed in sent mail on 1.5.2 or 1.4.14 with UW imap

2008-04-01 Thread David C. Rankin
* with password *yourpassword* sslfingerprint "AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF:00:11:22:33:44:55:66:77:88:99" -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E

Re: [SM-USERS] configuration of squirrel mail

2008-01-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Quote: You might want to test your configuration by browsing to http://your-squirrelmail-location/src/configtest.php Happy SquirrelMailing! That's it. If you have any questions, consult: http://www.squirrelmail.org/docs/admin/admin.html Then post your questions here. -- David C. Ran

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.4.13 - reply to message issue

2008-01-17 Thread David C. Rankin
t; > Am I missing something ?? > > WAIT! Don't hijack this thread, I have to solve this one.. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsi

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug: Replies from subfolders not placed in sent mail on 1.5.2 or 1.4.14 with UW imap

2008-01-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Jan 16, 2008 10:57 PM, Paul Lesniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Jan 16, 2008 10:49 PM, David C. Rankin >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >>>> Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >>>>&g

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug: Replies from subfolders not placed in sent mail on 1.5.2 or 1.4.14 with UW imap

2008-01-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Jan 16, 2008 10:49 PM, David C. Rankin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >>> Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >>>>>>> Here is a heads up on an issues that affects both 1.5.2-dev and >>>>>&g

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug: Replies from subfolders not placed in sent mail on 1.5.2 or 1.4.14 with UW imap

2008-01-16 Thread David C. Rankin
n checking email https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331683 This OP will follow up with the other requested information -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 71

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug: Replies from subfolders not placed in sent mail on 1.5.2 or 1.4.14 with UW imap

2008-01-16 Thread David C. Rankin
. SquirrelMail opens >> imap connection, selects original folder, changes flags and then tries to >> select different imap folder. >> >> Looks like UW follows rfc3501 to the letter. >> >> Reply should not

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug: Replies from subfolders not placed in sent mail on 1.5.2 or 1.4.14 with UW imap

2008-01-14 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul Lesniewski wrote: > On Jan 14, 2008 12:15 PM, David C. Rankin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Listmates, >> >> Here is a heads up on an issues that affects both 1.5.2-dev and >> 1.4.14 >> svn. The os is openSuSE 10.3 the mail server is UW i

Re: [SM-USERS] Can't create folders containing subfolders

2008-01-14 Thread David C. Rankin
you using? If it is UW imap, you will need to install 1.5.2-dev to correct the folder/subfolder problem. I don't have experience with the other mailers (dovecot, cyrus, courier) so someone else will have to lend their help there. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC

[SM-USERS] Bug: Replies from subfolders not placed in sent mail on 1.5.2 or 1.4.14 with UW imap

2008-01-14 Thread David C. Rankin
sent-mail folder. This same behavior occurs in both 1.5.2-dev and 1.4.14 svn. It is repeatable every time. Logs: There is nothing remarkable in the mail or apache logs. I don't know whether this is a bug, issue or feature, but I thought I would pass it along. -- David C. R

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.4.14SVN - ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server. Query: SELECT "INBOX"

2008-01-10 Thread David C. Rankin
Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > > David C. Rankin wrote: >> >> Ummm. Looks like I get to learn a new imap package. I took a look at >> cyrus, config looks terrible. I have another box with dovecot just >> sitting there, I'll start with dovecot and go from there. >>

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.4.14SVN - ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server. Query: SELECT "INBOX"

2008-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
forward with attachment error of: ERROR: Bad or malformed request. Query: FETCH 12652 BODY[3.HEADER] Server responded: Bogus sequence in FETCH: Sequence out of range is related to the same problem. I'm off to dovecot. Thanks Tomas! The 1.5.2-dev interface is awesome. Keep up the great wo

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.4.14SVN - ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server. Query: SELECT "INBOX"

2008-01-07 Thread David C. Rankin
David C. Rankin wrote: > Listmates, > > A fresh svn install on opensuse 10.3 with wu imap. I am receiving a > very strange error when replying to messages. The error is: > > ERROR: > ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server. > Query: SELECT "INBOX" >

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14.4 not handling folders/subfolders properly on new install

2008-01-07 Thread David C. Rankin
Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > > David C. Rankin wrote: >> Listmates, >> >> I had to replace a drive that held sqmail. On reload, I restored the >> mail files to each users home directory under "Mail" the normal mail >> root. For users with subfolder

[SM-USERS] 1.4.14SVN - ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server. Query: SELECT "INBOX"

2008-01-07 Thread David C. Rankin
. If I can run any more tests to help or provide any more information, just let me know and I will be glad to comply. P.S. - As in my response to the folder issue, I will pull a copy of 1.5.2 and check that out. Thanks for all your good work. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC

Re: [SM-USERS] svn 14.4 not handling folders/subfolders properly on new install

2008-01-07 Thread David C. Rankin
Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > > David C. Rankin wrote: >> Listmates, >> >> I had to replace a drive that held sqmail. On reload, I restored the >> mail files to each users home directory under "Mail" the normal mail >> root. For users with subfolder

[SM-USERS] svn 14.4 not handling folders/subfolders properly on new install

2008-01-04 Thread David C. Rankin
e subfolders grouped under it. Now it will not subscribe to the folder and just lists all the subfolders under the "folders" pane. Here is a screenshot to further help with what I am saying: http://www.3111skyline.com/download/screenshot/sqmailfolders.jpg Thanks for your help!

Re: [SM-USERS] Error when replyring: Connection dropped

2007-12-18 Thread David C. Rankin
p up the great work Paul and Thomas! -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Op

Re: [SM-USERS] HELP! my mail aministrator got fired!!

2007-12-03 Thread David C. Rankin
can you help me?? > -josh > See for example: http://en.opensuse.org/Recover_Root_Password -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. - SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the de